Suppr超能文献

颈动脉斑块易损性评估的超声弹性成像及回声分析。

Carotid Plaque Vulnerability Assessment Using Ultrasound Elastography and Echogenicity Analysis.

机构信息

1 Laboratory of Biorheology and Medical Ultrasonics, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Saint-Denis, Rm R11-464, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.

2 Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):847-855. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19211. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate ultrasound elastography and echogenicity analysis to discriminate between carotid plaques in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis versus patients with asymptomatic stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic ICA stenosis of more than 50% were recruited for the study. After both carotid arteries were scanned, plaque translation and elastography and echogenicity features were assessed. Parameters of index stenosis (i.e., symptomatic or more severe stenosis) were compared between populations. For further validation, parameters of index stenosis were also compared with those of the contralateral artery for segments with plaque. Segments without plaque on the index side were also evaluated between populations. ROC curve analyses were performed using a cross-validation method with bootstrapping to calculate sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with symptomatic (n = 26) or asymptomatic (n = 40) carotid stenoses were included. The maximum axial strain (p < 0.001), maximum axial shear strain magnitude (p = 0.03), and percentage of low-intensity of gray level (p = 0.01) of the index ICA were lower for patients with symptoms than for those without symptoms. In both groups, the contralateral ICA had translation and elastography and echogenicity parameters similar to those of the index ICA in patients with asymptomatic stenosis. The ROC curve for the detection of vulnerable plaques in patients with symptomatic stenosis was higher when ultrasound elastography and ultrasound echogenicity were used in combination than when each method was used alone (p < 0.001); a sensitivity of 71.6% and a specificity of 79.3% were obtained.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study establishes the usefulness of combining elastography with echogenicity analysis to discriminate plaques in patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis versus asymptomatic stenosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估超声弹性成像和回声分析在区分症状性颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄患者与无症状狭窄患者颈动脉斑块方面的作用。

受试者和方法

研究招募了有症状和无症状 ICA 狭窄超过 50%的患者。在对双侧颈动脉进行扫描后,评估斑块的移动度和弹性成像及回声特征。比较两组人群中指数狭窄(即症状性或更严重狭窄)的参数。为了进一步验证,还比较了指数狭窄的参数与对侧动脉斑块节段的参数。还比较了指数侧无斑块的节段在两组人群中的差异。使用交叉验证方法和引导重抽样进行 ROC 曲线分析,以计算敏感性和特异性。

结果

纳入了 66 例有症状(n = 26)或无症状(n = 40)颈动脉狭窄患者。与无症状患者相比,症状性 ICA 的最大轴向应变(p < 0.001)、最大轴向剪切应变幅度(p = 0.03)和灰度级低强度百分比(p = 0.01)更低。在两组中,无症状狭窄患者的对侧 ICA 的移动度和弹性成像及回声参数与指数侧相似。与单独使用每种方法相比,当将超声弹性成像和超声回声分析结合使用时,用于检测症状性狭窄患者易损斑块的 ROC 曲线的准确性更高(p < 0.001);获得了 71.6%的敏感性和 79.3%的特异性。

结论

这项初步研究证实了联合使用弹性成像和回声分析来区分症状性 ICA 狭窄患者与无症状狭窄患者的斑块的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验