Trontelj J V, Mihelin M, Fernandez J M, Stålberg E
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Jun;49(6):677-85. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.6.677.
This single fibre EMG study compares the standard method of neuromuscular jitter measurement in voluntarily activated muscle to that by intramuscular electrical stimulation of motor axons in a group of normal subjects. The latter method avoids the interdischarge interval-dependent jitter, as well as a possible failure to recognise split muscle fibres. The mean MCD on axonal stimulation was only 5.2 microseconds less than in the voluntary activation study and was thus 8% more than theoretically expected for single motor end plates. The difference could be due to an axonal jitter and some other factors. Axonal stimulation has proved to be a relatively easy and reliable method for routine estimation of neuromuscular jitter, provided that the resolution of time measurement is better than 2 microseconds, so that low jitter due to occasional direct muscle fibre stimulation is not mistaken for a normal reading. The upper normal limits for the extensor digitorum communis muscle suggested by the present study are 40 microseconds (individual muscle fibres) and 25 microseconds (mean of 30 muscle fibres).
这项单纤维肌电图研究将一组正常受试者中,在自主激活肌肉时测量神经肌肉颤抖的标准方法,与通过肌内电刺激运动轴突的方法进行了比较。后一种方法避免了放电间期依赖性颤抖,以及可能无法识别分裂肌纤维的情况。轴突刺激时的平均MCD仅比自主激活研究中少5.2微秒,因此比单个运动终板的理论预期多8%。这种差异可能是由于轴突颤抖和其他一些因素。事实证明,轴突刺激是一种相对简单可靠的常规估计神经肌肉颤抖的方法,前提是时间测量分辨率优于2微秒,这样因偶尔直接刺激肌纤维导致的低颤抖就不会被误认为是正常读数。本研究提出的示指伸肌的正常上限为40微秒(单个肌纤维)和25微秒(30个肌纤维的平均值)。