Cadden Margaret H, Guty Erin T, Arnett Peter A
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jun 1;34(4):495-502. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy067.
The current study explored the moderating role of cognitive reserve on the relationship between disability and depression in a sample of individuals in which brain pathology is thought to contribute to depression (multiple sclerosis; MS).
Fifty-four individuals with MS were examined. Depression was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS). In addition to collecting demographic (education) and disease burden (Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS) related variables, participants completed a neuropsychological test battery and psychosocial questionnaires. Cognitive reserve (CR) was conceptualized in two ways: Fixed CR and Malleable CR. Fixed CR was measured using years of education and crystallized intelligence (Shipley Vocabulary). Malleable CR was operationalized as a composite of measures from the Cognitive Heath Questionnaire (CHQ). Two regressions on depression (BDI-FS) examining either type of cognitive reserve, EDSS, and their interactions were explored. Results: The interaction between EDSS and both conceptualizations of cognitive reserve were significant, t(50) = -2.60, p = .013, PRE = .12 (Fixed CR); t(47) = -2.02, p = .049, PRE = .08 (Malleable CR). Simple effects testing revealed the same pattern regardless of the type of cognitive reserve examined; EDSS predicted depression only in those with low cognitive reserve.
Cognitive reserve moderates the relationship between disability and depression in MS; disability does not appear to influence depression in those with high cognitive reserve.
本研究在一个被认为脑病理学与抑郁症相关的个体样本(多发性硬化症;MS)中,探讨认知储备在残疾与抑郁关系中的调节作用。
对54名患有MS的个体进行了检查。使用贝克抑郁量表快速筛查版(BDI-FS)测量抑郁情况。除了收集与人口统计学(教育程度)和疾病负担(扩展残疾状态量表;EDSS)相关的变量外,参与者还完成了一套神经心理测试和社会心理问卷。认知储备(CR)从两种方式进行概念化:固定认知储备和可塑认知储备。固定认知储备通过受教育年限和晶体智力(希普利词汇表)来测量。可塑认知储备被操作为认知健康问卷(CHQ)各项测量指标的综合得分。对抑郁(BDI-FS)进行了两次回归分析,分别考察了两种认知储备类型、EDSS及其相互作用。结果:EDSS与两种认知储备概念化之间的交互作用均显著,t(50) = -2.60,p = .013,PRE = .12(固定认知储备);t(47) = -2.02,p = .049,PRE = .08(可塑认知储备)。无论考察哪种认知储备类型,简单效应检验都显示出相同的模式;EDSS仅在认知储备较低的个体中预测抑郁。
认知储备调节了MS中残疾与抑郁之间的关系;残疾似乎不会影响认知储备高的个体的抑郁情况。