Suppr超能文献

比较四种不同设计媒介与临床终端用户沟通预期绩效结果的有效性。

Comparing the Effectiveness of Four Different Design Media in Communicating Desired Performance Outcomes With Clinical End Users.

机构信息

1 Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

2 Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

出版信息

HERD. 2019 Apr;12(2):87-99. doi: 10.1177/1937586718796626. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of four different design communication media in helping clinical end users understand spatial and functional information and in supporting their ability to provide design feedback.

BACKGROUND

It is critical to involve clinical end users early in the design process to test design solutions and ensure the design of a new healthcare facility supports their ability to deliver high-quality care. Traditional architectural design communication media such as floor plans and perspectives can be challenging for clinical design team members to understand. Physical and virtual mock-ups are becoming more popular as design communication media. However, nominal evidence exists comparing the effectiveness of different design media in supporting clinical end-user engagement and contribution during the design process.

METHOD

An exploratory, qualitative study was conducted with clinical end users to evaluate the effectiveness of four different media commonly used in design communication.

RESULTS

Traditional architectural representations convey limited useful information to clinical end users, impacting the amount and type of feedback they can provide. More immersive media, such as physical and virtual mock-ups, support an increasingly holistic understanding of proposed design solutions, inciting more design solutions that range from the inclusion and exclusion of design features to location, position, and functionality of those features.

CONCLUSIONS

When used in combination, each media can contribute to eliciting clinical end-user feedback at varying scales. The overall preference and higher effectiveness in eliciting design feedback from clinical end users highlights the importance of physical mock-up in communicating healthcare design solutions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较四种不同设计沟通媒体在帮助临床终端用户理解空间和功能信息以及支持他们提供设计反馈能力方面的有效性。

背景

在设计过程中尽早让临床终端用户参与以测试设计方案并确保新医疗保健设施的设计能够支持他们提供高质量护理的能力至关重要。传统的建筑设计沟通媒体,如平面图和透视图,对于临床设计团队成员来说可能难以理解。物理和虚拟模型作为设计沟通媒体越来越受欢迎。然而,在支持临床终端用户在设计过程中的参与和贡献方面,不同设计媒体的有效性比较方面的证据有限。

方法

采用探索性定性研究方法,评估临床终端用户常用的四种不同媒体的有效性。

结果

传统的建筑表示法向临床终端用户传达的有用信息有限,影响了他们能够提供的反馈数量和类型。更具沉浸感的媒体,如物理和虚拟模型,支持对拟议设计解决方案的更全面理解,激发了更多从包括和排除设计特征到这些特征的位置、位置和功能的设计解决方案。

结论

当组合使用时,每种媒体都可以在不同的尺度上引发临床终端用户的反馈。临床终端用户对设计反馈的整体偏好和更高的有效性突显了物理模型在传达医疗保健设计解决方案方面的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验