• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于血培养排除新生儿败血症的抗生素最短治疗时间。

Minimum Duration of Antibiotic Treatment Based on Blood Culture in Rule Out Neonatal Sepsis.

机构信息

From the Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Division, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster Children Hospital, Hamilton, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, Al-Baha University, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 May;38(5):528-532. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002182.

DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000002182
PMID:30169482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neonatologists usually wait 48 hours for blood culture results before deciding to discontinue antibiotics. The objective of the study was to analyze time to positive blood culture in rule out sepsis and estimate the minimum duration of antibiotics.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of blood culture at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, McMaster Children's Hospital (January 2004 to December 2013) using BacT/Alert® 3D microbial system was conducted. We calculated average time taken for blood culture samples to emit a positive signal and compared it between Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Kaplan-Meier curves for time to detect positive culture were generated. A Cox proportional hazard regression model with the outcome variable "time to detect positive blood culture" and predictor variables "early-onset sepsis (EOS) versus late-onset sepsis (LOS)", "Gram-positive versus Gram-negative" and "definite versus possible pathogen versus contaminant" was generated.

RESULTS

Of 7,480 blood cultures performed in 9,254 neonates, 885 samples grew microorganisms. 845 culture reports from 627 neonates were analyzed. Definite or opportunistic pathogens caused 815 (96%) infections (54 EOS and 791 LOS) and the rest were contaminants. Gram-negative organisms grew significantly faster than Gram-positive (P < 0.001). Cultures from EOS were positive significantly earlier than LOS (P = 0.032). Gram-negative status was an independent predictor of early detection of a positive culture (hazard ratio 3.5 [95% CI, 2.7-4.5] P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The probability of positive blood culture beyond 24 hours for a Gram-negative organism is small. Empiric antimicrobial treatment can be reduced after 24 hours to target only Gram-positive organisms in LOS and can be stopped in EOS unless clinical or laboratory parameters strongly suggest sepsis.

摘要

背景

新生儿科医生通常会等待 48 小时,等待血培养结果,然后再决定是否停止使用抗生素。本研究旨在分析血培养排除败血症的阳性时间,并估计抗生素的最短持续时间。

方法

对麦克马斯特儿童医院新生儿重症监护病房(2004 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月)的血培养进行回顾性分析,使用 BacT/Alert® 3D 微生物系统。我们计算了血液培养样本发出阳性信号所需的平均时间,并比较了革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌之间的差异。绘制了时间至阳性培养的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线。使用以“阳性血培养时间”为因变量、“早发型败血症(EOS)与晚发型败血症(LOS)”、“革兰氏阳性菌与革兰氏阴性菌”、“明确病原体与可能病原体与污染菌”为预测变量的 Cox 比例风险回归模型。

结果

在 9254 例新生儿中进行了 7480 次血培养,其中 885 次培养出微生物。对 627 例新生儿的 845 份培养报告进行了分析。明确或机会性病原体引起 815 例(96%)感染(54 例 EOS 和 791 例 LOS),其余为污染菌。革兰氏阴性菌的生长速度明显快于革兰氏阳性菌(P<0.001)。EOS 的培养阳性时间明显早于 LOS(P=0.032)。革兰氏阴性状态是早期检测阳性培养的独立预测因子(风险比 3.5[95%CI,2.7-4.5],P<0.001)。

结论

革兰氏阴性菌在 24 小时后血培养阳性的概率较小。对于 LOS 中的革兰氏阳性菌,经验性抗菌治疗可以在 24 小时后减少,而对于 EOS,除非临床或实验室参数强烈提示败血症,否则可以停止治疗。

相似文献

1
Minimum Duration of Antibiotic Treatment Based on Blood Culture in Rule Out Neonatal Sepsis.基于血培养排除新生儿败血症的抗生素最短治疗时间。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 May;38(5):528-532. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002182.
2
Clinical and Microbiologic Characteristics of Early-onset Sepsis Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Opportunities for Antibiotic Stewardship.极低出生体重儿早发型败血症的临床和微生物学特征:抗生素管理的机遇
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 May;36(5):477-481. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001473.
3
Neonatal septicaemia in Ilorin: bacterial pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern.伊洛林地区的新生儿败血症:细菌病原体及抗生素敏感性模式
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002 Jun;31(2):127-30.
4
Neonatal sepsis in hospital-born babies: bacterial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.医院出生婴儿的新生儿败血症:细菌分离株及抗生素敏感性模式
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 Nov;13(11):629-32.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of the ROCHE Septifast PCR system for the rapid detection of blood pathogens in neonatal sepsis-A prospective clinical trial.罗氏Septifast PCR系统对新生儿败血症血液病原体快速检测的诊断准确性——一项前瞻性临床试验
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187688. eCollection 2017.
6
Neonatal bloodstream infections in a Ghanaian Tertiary Hospital: Are the current antibiotic recommendations adequate?加纳一家三级医院的新生儿血流感染:当前的抗生素推荐是否足够?
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 24;16(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1913-4.
7
Characteristics of neonatal Sepsis at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理医院新生儿脓毒症的特征。
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):666-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
8
Clinical characteristics and epidemiology of sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit in the era of multi-drug resistant organisms: A retrospective review.多重耐药菌时代新生儿重症监护病房脓毒症的临床特征与流行病学:一项回顾性研究
Pediatr Neonatol. 2018 Feb;59(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Risk factors and etiology of neonatal sepsis in Tikur Anbessa University Hospital, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚迪库尔安贝萨大学医院新生儿败血症的危险因素及病因
Ethiop Med J. 2010 Jan;48(1):11-21.
10
An optimised dosing regimen versus a standard dosing regimen of vancomycin for the treatment of late onset sepsis due to Gram-positive microorganisms in neonates and infants aged less than 90 days (NeoVanc): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.优化剂量方案与万古霉素标准剂量方案治疗 90 天以下新生儿和婴儿革兰阳性微生物引起的晚发性败血症(NeoVanc):一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 15;21(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4184-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Evaluation of Empiric Vancomycin Therapy for Infectious Workups in Relation to Methicillin-Resistant (MRSA) Risk Factors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.新生儿重症监护病房中经验性万古霉素治疗与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)危险因素相关的感染检查的回顾性评估。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;30(2):198-205. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-30.2.198. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Time to positive blood cultures in neonatal sepsis evaluations.新生儿败血症评估中血培养转为阳性的时间。
J Perinatol. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02323-z.
3
Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates.
将抗感染药物加入外周静脉留置导管并不能降低新生儿的感染率。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 5;11:1255492. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1255492. eCollection 2023.
4
Short course antibiotic therapy: When is no difference the same?短疗程抗生素治疗:何时无差异等同于相同?
J Perinatol. 2023 Jun;43(6):683-684. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01671-y. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
5
Time to positivity of blood cultures in neonatal late-onset bacteraemia.血培养阳性时间与新生儿晚发型菌血症。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Nov;107(6):583-588. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323416. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Neonatal ICU antibiotic use trends within an integrated delivery network.新生儿重症监护病房抗生素使用趋势在一个综合交付网络内。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jan 31;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01057-3.
7
Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Early Goal-Directed Therapy Combined with Meticulous Nursing Intervention in Patients with Posttraumatic Sepsis.创伤后脓毒症患者早期目标导向治疗联合精细化护理干预的临床疗效回顾性分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 13;2021:6706464. doi: 10.1155/2021/6706464. eCollection 2021.
8
Antibiotic Discontinuation 24 h After Neonatal Late-Onset Sepsis Work-Up-A Validated Decision Tree Model.新生儿晚发性败血症检查后24小时停用抗生素——一种经过验证的决策树模型
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 19;9:693882. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.693882. eCollection 2021.
9
Stratified Management for Bacterial Infections in Late Preterm and Term Neonates: Current Strategies and Future Opportunities Toward Precision Medicine.晚期早产儿和足月儿细菌感染的分层管理:精准医学的当前策略与未来机遇
Front Pediatr. 2021 Apr 1;9:590969. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.590969. eCollection 2021.
10
Can We Optimize Antibiotic Use in Norwegian Neonates? A Prospective Comparison Between a University Hospital and a District Hospital.我们能否优化挪威新生儿的抗生素使用?大学医院与地区医院的前瞻性比较。
Front Pediatr. 2019 Oct 24;7:440. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00440. eCollection 2019.