Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic variances of body weight in crossbreed populations of the Japanese quail.

A major part of the growth performance in birds is the result of the combined effects of genes, including the general and specific combining ability that requires the design of an optimal mating system. The aim of this study was to fit the best model for each body weight trait from hatch to 45 days and the estimation of the variance components and the genetic parameters for the body weight traits of a crossbred population. This crossbred population was created by 4 strains of Japanese quail, including the Italian Speckled (A), Tuxedo (B), Pharaoh (C), Texas A&M (D), and the body weights of the different combinations were analyzed by 24 models including the direct genetic effect, the non-additive genetic effects including dominance and epistatic effects, the maternal permanent environmental and maternal genetic effects. The selection of the best fit model of each trait was performed based on the deviance information criteria. The variance components were estimated using a single-trait animal model analyzed with Gibbs sampling. At the early stage of bird growth, maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects had a considerable contribution to the best model, but the contribution of these effects reduced with an increase in the bird's age and the additive variance contribution increased. Adding non-additive genetic effects (dominance and epistasis) to the models significantly reduced the variance of the error and the additive genetic variance estimated with high accuracy. The estimated heritability of body weight traits for the body weights of hatch, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 d were 0.316, 0.170, 0.251, 0.153, 0.132, 0.164, 0.290, 0.425, 0.476, and 0.362, respectively. The ratio of maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental was considerable especially on early age body weight but the ratio of dominance and epistatic variances on each of the body weight traits was less than 4.5% of the total variance, but led to a more accurate estimates of the direct additive genetic.