• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年右半结肠癌患者开放手术、腹腔镜手术及手辅助腹腔镜手术的疗效:一项病例对照研究。

Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with right colon cancers: A case-control study.

作者信息

Wei Mingtian, Zhang Xubing, Ma Pingfan, He Wanbin, Bi Liang, Wang Ziqiang

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center, Chengdu The People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11907. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011907.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000011907
PMID:30170384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6392753/
Abstract

An increasing proportion of patients aged more than 70 years old are suffering from colorectal cancers. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-terms outcomes between open surgery (OS) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in treatment of these elderly patients with right colon cancers.We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent right colon resections for cancers in our institution between June, 2009 and December, 2014. Short- and long-terms outcomes including surgical endpoints, postsurgical recovery data, postoperative morbidity and mortality, overall survival and disease-free survival were compared among OS, LS, and HALS groups. All data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0.Finally, 69 consecutive patients (OS = 26, LS = 24, HALS = 19) with right colon cancers were included in the analysis. Compared with OS, HALS was associated with less time to first anus exhaust (P = .013), first liquid diet (P = .045), and first soft diet (P = .036). Meanwhile, there were significant less operative time (P = .0027), blood loss (P < .001), and less time to first liquid diet (P = .009) in HALS, compared with LS. In regards to long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences in overall survival and disease-free survival among the 3 groups.Compared with OS or LS, HALS may be more favorable in the treatment of elderly right colon cancers with decreased surgical time and postoperative recovery, and comparable cancer-specific survivals.

摘要

70岁以上的患者患结直肠癌的比例越来越高。本研究旨在比较开放手术(OS)或传统腹腔镜手术(LS)与手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)治疗这些老年右半结肠癌患者的短期和长期疗效。我们回顾性分析了2009年6月至2014年12月在我院接受右半结肠癌切除术的患者。比较了OS、LS和HALS组的短期和长期疗效,包括手术终点、术后恢复数据、术后发病率和死亡率、总生存率和无病生存率。所有数据均采用SPSS 22.0进行分析。最后,69例连续的右半结肠癌患者(OS = 26例,LS = 24例,HALS = 19例)纳入分析。与OS相比,HALS组首次排气时间(P = 0.013)、首次流食时间(P = 0.045)和首次软食时间(P = 0.036)更短。同时,与LS相比,HALS组手术时间显著缩短(P = 0.0027)、失血量减少(P < 0.001)、首次流食时间更短(P = 0.009)。在长期疗效方面,三组的总生存率和无病生存率无显著差异。与OS或LS相比,HALS在治疗老年右半结肠癌方面可能更具优势,手术时间和术后恢复时间缩短,癌症特异性生存率相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9f/6392753/2e85f134e3ac/medi-97-e11907-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9f/6392753/fc854710b0e1/medi-97-e11907-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9f/6392753/2e85f134e3ac/medi-97-e11907-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9f/6392753/fc854710b0e1/medi-97-e11907-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9f/6392753/2e85f134e3ac/medi-97-e11907-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with right colon cancers: A case-control study.老年右半结肠癌患者开放手术、腹腔镜手术及手辅助腹腔镜手术的疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11907. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011907.
2
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
3
A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.比较手助腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 May 7;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01869-w.
4
The Feasibility of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection Compared With Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer.手辅助腹腔镜和腹腔镜多脏器切除术与开放手术治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的可行性比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):e57-e65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000428.
5
Laparoscopic surgery as a treatment option for elderly patients with colon cancer.腹腔镜手术作为老年结肠癌患者的一种治疗选择。
J BUON. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):424-430.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis.手助腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec 4;15(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1277-2.
7
Does nasogastric tube decompression get used less often with laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared with open colectomy?与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜和手助腹腔镜结直肠切除术后使用鼻胃管减压的情况是否较少?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4564-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3124-z. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
8
Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中完整系膜切除与传统系膜切除的肿瘤学结局
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):E698-E702. doi: 10.1111/ans.14493. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
9
Morbidity of hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic splenectomy: a 6-year review.手助腹腔镜脾切除术与传统腹腔镜脾切除术的发病率比较:6 年回顾。
Can J Surg. 2012 Aug;55(4):227-32. doi: 10.1503/cjs.028910.
10
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for obese patients: decreased conversions with the hand-assisted technique.肥胖患者的腹腔镜结直肠手术:手助技术可降低中转开腹率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):548-54. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2089-x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.EAES/SAGES 关于优化老年人围手术期护理的循证建议和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4104-4126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for an esophageal hiatal hernia with incarcerated transverse colon presenting after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case report.腹腔镜胃切除术后出现绞窄性横结肠的食管裂孔疝的手辅助腹腔镜手术:病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2023 Mar 20;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40792-023-01621-y.
3
Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopy for colorectal surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: a novel technique for right colon cancer.手辅助腹腔镜右半结肠切除术联合完整结肠系膜切除及中央血管结扎:一种治疗右结肠癌的新技术
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3383-3390. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5354-3. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
2
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗结直肠癌:一项荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5601-5614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients.
手助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜结直肠手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;37(11):2309-2319. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04272-x. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.根治性右半结肠切除术的淋巴结清扫术和完整结肠系膜切除术的定义和报告:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):846-861. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.比较手助腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 May 7;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01869-w.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for Bochdalek hernia in an adult patient with a history of laparotomy: A case report.手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗有剖腹手术史成年患者的波奇达勒克疝:病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;60:164-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
腹腔镜手术对老年直肠癌切除患者的益处是否能得以维持?对446例连续患者的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):632-642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;14:61. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0816-6.
5
Laparoscopic or open hemicolectomy for elderly patients with right colon cancer? A retrospective analysis.老年右半结肠癌患者行腹腔镜或开腹半结肠切除术?一项回顾性分析。
G Chir. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):205-8. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.5.205.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with open resection for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched study with long-term follow-up.手辅助腹腔镜手术与开放切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较:一项长期随访的病例匹配研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;13:199. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0616-4.
7
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a multicenter matched case-control study.老年患者结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:一项多中心配对病例对照研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):2040-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4172-x. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
8
Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer in elderly patients.老年患者直肠癌腹腔镜与开放手术切除的疗效
J Surg Res. 2015 Feb;193(2):613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
9
The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in a right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.手辅助腹腔镜手术在右侧结肠癌右半结肠切除术中的作用。
Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Feb;30(1):11-7. doi: 10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.11. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
10
Current status of rectal cancer treatment in China.中国直肠癌治疗的现状。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;15(11):1345-50. doi: 10.1111/codi.12269.