• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术对老年直肠癌切除患者的益处是否能得以维持?对446例连续患者的分析。

Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Manceau Gilles, Hain Elisabeth, Maggiori Léon, Mongin Cécile, Prost À la Denise Justine, Panis Yves

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (PMAD), Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Denis Diderot University (Paris VII), 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):632-642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4
PMID:27317029
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies showed that age is significantly associated with impaired outcomes after open colorectal surgery. However, very few data exist on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to assess operative results of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery according to age.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2014, 446 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer resection were identified from a prospective database. Five groups were defined: age <45 (n = 44), 45-54 (n = 80), 55-64 (n = 166), 65-74 (n = 95) and ≥75 years (n = 61).

RESULTS

Elderly patients presented significantly higher ASA score (p = 0.004), higher Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and more frequent cardiovascular, pulmonary (p < 0.0001) and neurological (p = 0.03) comorbidities. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was similar between groups (34-35-37-43-43 %, p = 0.70). Medical morbidity slightly increased with age (14-9-14-19-26 %, p = 0.06), but there was no significant difference regarding clinical anastomotic leakage, surgical morbidity, major morbidity (Dindo ≥3), cardiopulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, age was not an independent factor for postoperative morbidity, unlike ASA score ≥3 (p = 0.039), neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.034) and operative time ≥240 min (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that laparoscopic rectal cancer resection might safely be performed irrespective of age.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,年龄与开放性结直肠手术后预后受损显著相关。然而,关于老年患者腹腔镜直肠癌手术的数据却非常少。本研究的目的是根据年龄评估腹腔镜直肠癌手术的手术结果。

方法

从2005年至2014年,从前瞻性数据库中确定了446例连续接受腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的患者。分为五组:年龄<45岁(n = 44)、45 - 54岁(n = 80)、55 - 64岁(n = 166)、65 - 74岁(n = 95)和≥75岁(n = 61)。

结果

老年患者的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分显著更高(p = 0.004),查尔森合并症指数更高(p < 0.0001),心血管、肺部(p < 0.0001)和神经(p = 0.03)合并症更常见。各组总体术后发病率相似(34% - 35% - 37% - 43% - 43%,p = 0.70)。医疗发病率随年龄略有增加(14% - 9% - 14% - 19% - 26%,p = 0.06),但在临床吻合口漏、手术发病率、严重发病率(Dindo≥3)、心肺并发症和住院时间方面无显著差异。在多变量分析中,与ASA评分≥3(p = 0.039)、新辅助放疗/化疗(p = 0.034)和手术时间≥240分钟(p = 0.013)不同,年龄不是术后发病的独立因素。

结论

本研究表明,无论年龄大小,腹腔镜直肠癌切除术都可以安全进行。

相似文献

1
Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients.腹腔镜手术对老年直肠癌切除患者的益处是否能得以维持?对446例连续患者的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):632-642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
2
Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment.腹腔镜手术对80岁以上超高龄患者的结直肠癌治疗真的有效吗?一项前瞻性多中心病例对照评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4372-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4755-7. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
3
Clinical Relevance of a Grading System for Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection: Analysis From a National Cohort Database.低位前切除术后吻合口漏分级系统的临床相关性:来自全国队列数据库的分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):706-713. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000800.
4
Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients.腹腔镜与开放手术行直肠癌低位前切除术后症状性吻合口漏的比较:对1014例连续患者的倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2848-56. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4566-2. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.腹腔镜直肠癌手术中的转流性回肠造口术:高昂的保护代价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4809-4816. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4811-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
Morbidity after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of morbidity in octogenarians and younger patients.腹腔镜与开放直肠癌手术后的发病率:八旬老人与年轻患者发病率的比较分析
Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;18(5):459-67. doi: 10.1111/codi.13136.
7
Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score.腹腔镜保肛手术治疗直肠癌吻合口漏后肠道功能障碍:一项对46例患者采用低位前切除评分的病例对照研究
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1028-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
8
Does pathologic response of rectal cancer influence postoperative morbidity after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision?直肠癌的病理反应是否会影响新辅助放化疗及全直肠系膜切除术后的发病率?
Surgery. 2014 Mar;155(3):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
9
Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?行机器人辅助直肠癌切除术的患者,手术时间延长是否会影响术后发病率?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3659-3666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6098-z. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除质量与环周切缘深度:前20例机器人手术病例的配对比较
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):603-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12634.

引用本文的文献

1
Total neoadjuvant therapy followed by total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in older patients real world data and proof of concept.老年直肠癌患者新辅助综合治疗后行全直肠系膜切除术:真实世界数据及概念验证
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 19;11:1448073. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1448073. eCollection 2024.
2
Survival benefit of surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.手术对老年局部晚期直肠癌患者的生存获益
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):4956-4968. doi: 10.62347/XSKR3897. eCollection 2024.
3
A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously.

本文引用的文献

1
Perineal or Abdominal Approach First During Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Which Is the Best Strategy?低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术中会阴入路与腹部入路孰先孰后:哪种是最佳策略?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jul;58(7):637-44. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000396.
2
A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):194. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505367.
3
A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。
一种新型培训项目:腹腔镜与机器人辅助直肠癌低位前切除术可同时进行培训。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 27;13:1169932. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1169932. eCollection 2023.
4
The safety and prognosis of radical surgery in colorectal cancer patients over 80 years old.80 岁以上结直肠癌患者根治性手术的安全性和预后。
BMC Surg. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01938-3.
5
Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.老年直肠癌患者的多学科管理:来自 SICG(意大利老年外科学会)、SIFIPAC(意大利外科病理生理学学会)、SICE(意大利内镜外科学会和新技术学会)和 WSES(世界急诊外科学会)国际共识项目的建议。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9.
6
Real-world impact of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.腹腔镜直肠癌手术的真实世界影响:基于人群的分析。
Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):e251-e258. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5829. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Impact of laparoscopic approach on the short-term outcomes of elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a nationwide Italian experience.腹腔镜手术对老年结直肠癌患者短期结局的影响:一项全国性的意大利经验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4305-4314. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07197-9. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
8
Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with right colon cancers: A case-control study.老年右半结肠癌患者开放手术、腹腔镜手术及手辅助腹腔镜手术的疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11907. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011907.
9
Management of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly: a critical review and algorithm.老年局部晚期直肠癌的管理:批判性综述与算法
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Apr;9(2):363-376. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.10.10.
10
Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?行机器人辅助直肠癌切除术的患者,手术时间延长是否会影响术后发病率?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3659-3666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6098-z. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
4
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a multicenter matched case-control study.老年患者结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:一项多中心配对病例对照研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):2040-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4172-x. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
6
Toward the end of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer? An 8-year experience in 189 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer.直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的尾声?189 例低位直肠癌患者 8 年的经验。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):801-5; discussion 805-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000979.
7
Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer in elderly patients.老年患者直肠癌腹腔镜与开放手术切除的疗效
J Surg Res. 2015 Feb;193(2):613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
8
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗后中低位直肠肿瘤的开腹与腹腔镜手术比较(COREAN 试验):一项开放标签、非劣效、随机对照临床试验的生存结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):767-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0. Epub 2014 May 15.
9
Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study.吻合口漏会影响直肠癌腹腔镜保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术后的功能结局和生活质量吗?一项病例匹配研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;29(4):459-67. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1833-y. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
10
EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum.EURECCA 结直肠:多学科管理:欧洲共识会议结肠和直肠。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):1.e1-1.e34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.048. Epub 2013 Oct 31.