Suppr超能文献

口服万古霉素与甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌感染:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Oral vancomycin versus metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Igarashi Yuki, Tashiro Sho, Enoki Yuki, Taguchi Kazuaki, Matsumoto Kazuaki, Ohge Hiroki, Suzuki Hiromichi, Nakamura Atsushi, Mori Nobuaki, Morinaga Yoshitomo, Yamagishi Yuka, Yoshizawa Sadako, Yanagihara Katsunori, Mikamo Hiroshige, Kunishima Hiroyuki

机构信息

Division of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):907-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Abstract

At present, vancomycin (VCM) and metronidazole (MNZ) are used for the first-line standard treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, their differential use has not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, a meta-analysis on differences in the efficacy for CDI between VCM and MNZ was performed. Reports of randomized controlled studies using VCM or MNZ to treat CDI were surveyed. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects model, and the risk ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Excluding overlapping reports, 1043 reports were extracted and 5 randomized controlled studies were extracted. There was no difference in therapeutic effects for CDI between VCM and MNZ (RR = 1.08, 95% CI (0.99-1.17), p = 0.09, I = 37%). On subgroup analysis by the severity, there was no difference in the clinical effects for CDI between VCM and MNZ in non-severe cases (risk ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.19, p = 0.06), but the clinical effects of VCM were significantly higher than those of MNZ in severe cases (risk ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.39, p = 0.03). No significant difference was noted in the recurrence rate, incidence of adverse event, time to exhibit therapeutic effects, or judgment of the bacteriological effects. As the therapeutic effects of VCM were superior in severe CDI cases, VCM should be considered first in severe cases.

摘要

目前,万古霉素(VCM)和甲硝唑(MNZ)用于艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的一线标准治疗。然而,它们的差异使用尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,对VCM和MNZ治疗CDI的疗效差异进行了荟萃分析。调查了使用VCM或MNZ治疗CDI的随机对照研究报告。采用Mantel-Haenszel方法和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并计算风险比和95%置信区间。排除重复报告后,提取了1043份报告,纳入了5项随机对照研究。VCM和MNZ治疗CDI的疗效无差异(RR = 1.08,95% CI(0.99 - 1.17),p = 0.09,I² = 37%)。按严重程度进行亚组分析,VCM和MNZ在非严重病例中治疗CDI的临床效果无差异(风险比:1.09,95%置信区间:1.00 - 1.19,p = 0.06);但在严重病例中VCM的临床效果显著高于MNZ(风险比:1.19,95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.39,p = 0.03)。复发率、不良事件发生率、出现治疗效果的时间或细菌学效果判断方面均未发现显著差异。由于VCM在严重CDI病例中的治疗效果更佳,因此在严重病例中应首先考虑使用VCM。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验