• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于四种严重程度分类的艰难梭菌感染治疗药物的临床疗效。

Clinical Efficacy of Therapeutic Agents for Clostridioides difficile Infection Based on Four Severity Classifications.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Japan.

Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 19;77(5):281-284. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2023.483. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

DOI:10.7883/yoken.JJID.2023.483
PMID:38556300
Abstract

Japanese guidelines recommend metronidazole (MNZ) and vancomycin (VCM) for non-severe and severe cases of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), respectively. In the present study, we investigated the use of CDI antimicrobials and evaluated their clinical efficacy and validity using four severity classifications. A retrospective chart review was conducted using the data of 137 inpatients with initially positive C. difficile toxin test results and the initiation of CDI antimicrobials between April 2015 and March 2019. Patients treated with VCM or oral MNZ were included for clinical efficacy analysis of CDI antimicrobials and validation of severity classifications. The endpoints were CDI recurrence, 30-day mortality, and diarrhea cure rates. No significant differences were found between the VCM and oral MNZ groups in the CDI recurrence rate (10.4% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.707), 30-day mortality rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.162), and diarrhea cure rate (61.9% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.238), regardless of severity. Treatment with oral MNZ for non-severe cases was promising, confirming its usefulness according to Japanese guidelines. Further investigation of the clinical efficacy of oral MNZ in patients with first-episode CDI and evaluation of the preferred severity classification are warranted.

摘要

日本指南分别推荐甲硝唑(MNZ)和万古霉素(VCM)用于非重症和重症艰难梭菌感染(CDI)病例。在本研究中,我们研究了 CDI 抗菌药物的使用,并使用四种严重程度分类评估了它们的临床疗效和有效性。对 2015 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月期间最初阳性艰难梭菌毒素检测结果和开始使用 CDI 抗菌药物的 137 名住院患者的病历进行了回顾性图表审查。纳入接受 VCM 或口服 MNZ 治疗的患者进行 CDI 抗菌药物的临床疗效分析和严重程度分类验证。终点是 CDI 复发、30 天死亡率和腹泻治愈率。VCM 组和口服 MNZ 组在 CDI 复发率(10.4%比 12.7%,P = 0.707)、30 天死亡率(12.5%比 5.6%,P = 0.162)和腹泻治愈率(61.9%比 72.7%,P = 0.238)方面无显著差异,无论严重程度如何。根据日本指南,对于非重症病例使用口服 MNZ 治疗是有希望的,证实了其有用性。有必要进一步研究口服 MNZ 对首次发作 CDI 患者的临床疗效,并评估首选严重程度分类。

相似文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Therapeutic Agents for Clostridioides difficile Infection Based on Four Severity Classifications.基于四种严重程度分类的艰难梭菌感染治疗药物的临床疗效。
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 19;77(5):281-284. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2023.483. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Oral vancomycin versus metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服万古霉素与甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌感染:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):907-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in Japanese hospitals 2008-2017: A real-world nationwide analysis of treatment pattern, incidence and testing density.2008-2017 年日本医院艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)感染:基于实际情况的全国范围内治疗模式、发病率和检测密度分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 May;26(5):438-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.11.005. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of metronidazole and vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile infection.回顾性研究甲硝唑和万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的疗效和安全性。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Oct;27(10):1407-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 20.
5
Optimal therapeutic recommendation for Clostridioides difficile infection in pediatric and adolescent populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年人群中艰难梭菌感染的最佳治疗推荐:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jun;182(6):2673-2681. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04944-y. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
6
The Trend for Antibiotic Use for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection in Japan.日本艰难梭菌感染抗生素使用趋势。
Biol Pharm Bull. 2020;43(4):693-696. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b19-01000.
7
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Clinical Significance of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Growth in Stool Cultures during the Era of Nonculture Methods for the Diagnosis of C. difficile Infection.非培养方法诊断艰难梭菌感染时代粪便培养中产毒艰难梭菌生长的临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0079921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00799-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
9
Outcomes associated with recent guideline recommendations removing metronidazole for treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study.与最近的指南建议去除甲硝唑治疗非严重艰难梭菌感染相关的结果:一项回顾性、观察性、全国性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Mar;57(3):106282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106282. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
10
A meta-analysis of metronidazole and vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, stratified by disease severity.一项针对甲硝唑和万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的荟萃分析,按疾病严重程度分层。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):339-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 19.