Suppr超能文献

超薄支架、可生物降解聚合物、西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄支架、耐用聚合物、依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉血运重建:BIOSCIENCE 随机试验 5 年结果。

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet. 2018 Sep 1;392(10149):737-746. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31715-X. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents combining an ultrathin cobalt-chromium stent platform with a biodegradable polymer eluting sirolimus have been shown to be non-inferior or superior to thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents in terms of 1 year safety and efficacy outcomes.

METHODS

In the randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority BIOSCIENCE trial, we compared biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes. Here, we assess the final 5-year clinical outcomes of BIOSCIENCE with regards to the primary clinical outcome of target lesion failure, which was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation. The primary analysis was done by intention to treat. The BIOSCIENCE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01443104.

FINDINGS

2008 (95%) of 2119 patients recruited between March 1, 2012, and May 31, 2013, completed 5 years of follow-up. Target lesion failure occurred in 198 patients (cumulative incidence 20·2%) treated with biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and in 189 patients (18·8%) treated with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (rate ratio [RR] 1·07, 95% CI 0·88-1·31; p=0·487). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients treated with biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents than in those treated with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (14·1% vs 10·3%; RR 1·36, 95% CI 1·06-1·75; p=0·017), driven by a difference in non-cardiovascular deaths. We observed no difference between groups in cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis at 5 years (1·6% in both groups; 1·02, 0·51-2·05; p=0·950).

INTERPRETATION

5-year risk of target lesion failure among all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is similar after implantation of ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents or thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents. Higher incidences of all-cause and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients treated with biodegradable-polymer stents eluting sirolimus than in those treated with durable-polymer stents eluting everolimus warrant careful observation in ongoing clinical trials.

FUNDING

Clinical Trials Unit of the University of Bern and Biotronik.

摘要

背景

与薄型、持久聚合物、依维莫司洗脱支架相比,结合超薄壁钴铬支架平台和可生物降解聚合物洗脱西罗莫司的药物洗脱支架在 1 年的安全性和疗效方面显示出非劣效或优效。

方法

在随机、单盲、多中心、非劣效性 BIOSCIENCE 试验中,我们比较了慢性稳定型冠状动脉疾病或急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架和持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的情况。在这里,我们根据主要临床终点(包括心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和临床指示的靶病变血运重建的复合终点)评估了 BIOSCIENCE 的最终 5 年临床结果。主要分析按意向治疗进行。BIOSCIENCE 试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01443104。

结果

2012 年 3 月 1 日至 2013 年 5 月 31 日期间招募的 2119 名患者中的 2008 名(95%)完成了 5 年随访。在接受可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗的 198 名患者(累积发生率 20.2%)和接受持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的 189 名患者(18.8%)中发生了靶病变失败(率比[RR]1.07,95%CI0.88-1.31;p=0.487)。接受可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者全因死亡率明显高于接受持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者(14.1% vs 10.3%;RR1.36,95%CI1.06-1.75;p=0.017),这主要是由于非心血管死亡率的差异所致。我们观察到两组在 5 年时确定的支架血栓形成的累积发生率无差异(两组均为 1.6%;1.02,0.51-2.05;p=0.950)。

解释

接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者植入超薄支架、可生物降解聚合物、西罗莫司洗脱支架或薄支架、持久聚合物、依维莫司洗脱支架后,5 年内靶病变失败的风险相似。与接受持久聚合物洗脱支架治疗的患者相比,接受可生物降解聚合物洗脱支架治疗的患者西罗莫司的全因和非心血管死亡率更高,这需要在正在进行的临床试验中仔细观察。

经费

伯尔尼大学临床研究单位和百多力公司。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验