• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 PI-RADS v2 类别≥3 用于诊断临床显著前列腺癌。

Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Colorado SOM, 12401 East 17th Avenue, Mail Stop L954, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):705-712. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1751-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-018-1751-5
PMID:30171296
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) against histopathology of Transperineal Mapping Biopsy (TPMB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IRB-approved retrospective cohort study included 47 men who had 3.0 T multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) and TPMB of prostate. Two radiologists independently evaluated T2, DWI, ADC map, and DCE images using PI-RADS v2 categories. A third radiologist served as tie-breaker. PI-RADS v2 score (PS) ≥ 3 lesions were correlated with 3D model of TPMB (3DTPMB) results based on prostate sectors. Two groups of csPCa status were separately analyzed for accuracy measures at lesion and person levels: Group 1 with GS (Gleason Score) ≥ 7 and group 2 with tumor volume ≥ 0.5 cc. Inter-rater reliability for PS and MR lexicon was calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with 3DTPMB had at least one lesion with PS ≥ 3 on mpMRI. PS of 5 had high PPV and high specificity of 100% at the lesion and person levels. Sensitivity of a PS ≥ 3 was 68.27% for group 1 and was 48.39% for group 2. Specificity was 93.56% for group 1 and was 95.53% for group 2. At the person level, sensitivity of PS ≥ 3 was 81.25% for group 1 and was 82.35% for group 2. Specificity was 32.26% for group 1 and was 53.85% for group 2.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS v2 category of 5 had high PPV and specificity; however, combined PS ≥ 3 had mixed performance in detection of csPCa.

摘要

目的

评估 PI-RADS v2 类别≥3 对经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺活检(TPMB)组织病理学的诊断效能,以检测临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)。

材料与方法

本研究为经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性队列研究,共纳入 47 名接受 3.0T 多参数 MRI(mpMRI)和经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺活检的男性患者。两名放射科医师分别使用 PI-RADS v2 类别独立评估 T2、DWI、ADC 图和 DCE 图像。第三名放射科医师负责裁决。PI-RADS v2 评分(PS)≥3 的病变与基于前列腺区域的 3DTPMB(3DTPMB)结果的 3D 模型相关。分别对 GS(Gleason 评分)≥7 和肿瘤体积≥0.5 cc 的两组 csPCa 患者进行病变和个体水平的准确性评估。计算 PS 和 MR 词汇的组内和组间可靠性。

结果

47 名患者的 3DTPMB 均至少有一个 PS≥3 的病变。PS 为 5 时,病变和个体水平的阳性预测值高(分别为 100%和 81.25%),特异性高(均为 100%)。PS≥3 的敏感度为组 1 的 68.27%,组 2 的 48.39%。组 1 的特异性为 93.56%,组 2 的特异性为 95.53%。在个体水平上,PS≥3 的敏感度为组 1 的 81.25%,组 2 的 82.35%。组 1 的特异性为 32.26%,组 2 的特异性为 53.85%。

结论

PI-RADS v2 类别 5 具有高阳性预测值和特异性;然而,PS≥3 联合检测在检测 csPCa 时表现不一。

相似文献

1
Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.评估 PI-RADS v2 类别≥3 用于诊断临床显著前列腺癌。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):705-712. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1751-5.
2
Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.探讨 DCE-MRI 相对于 T2 和 DWI 在经根治性前列腺切除术定义的有临床意义的外周带前列腺病变的 PI-RADS v2 评估中的准确作用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1520-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1807-6.
3
Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.哪些临床和影像学特征可预测 PI-RADS 3 病变中的临床显著前列腺癌?高容量学术中心的回顾性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 May;114:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2 与 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 对移行区前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108704. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
5
Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.前瞻性 PI-RADS v2.1 伴显著弥散受限的不典型前列腺增生结节:多参数 MRI 检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):395-403. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24370. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2版在前列腺癌检测中的评估
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr;85(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.PI-RADS 版本 2 和版本 2.1 对检测移行区前列腺癌的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 May;216(5):1247-1256. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23883. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.PI-RADS 版本 2 决策规则的拟议调整:对前列腺癌检测的影响。
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):119-129. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161124. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
9
Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.PI-RADS v. 2 用于评估前列腺癌的多参数 MRI 的读者间一致性:一项使用全组织切片作为参考标准的研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):546-555. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26220. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.基于PI-RADS v2.1的双参数和多参数MRI在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;53(1):283-291. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27283. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Combination of Multiparametric MRI PI-RADS Score v2.1 and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density for Prostate Cancer Detection.多参数磁共振成像PI-RADS v2.1评分与前列腺特异性抗原密度联合检测前列腺癌的诊断准确性
Cureus. 2025 Mar 7;17(3):e80238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80238. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
A novel clinically significant prostate cancer prediction system with multiparametric MRI and PSA: P.Z.A. score.一种基于多参数 MRI 和 PSA 的新型具有临床意义的前列腺癌预测系统:P.Z.A.评分。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11306-2.
3
Performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging through PIRADS scoring system in biopsy naïve patients with suspicious prostate cancer.
多参数磁共振成像通过PIRADS评分系统在未经活检的疑似前列腺癌患者中的表现。
Arab J Urol. 2022 Apr 24;20(3):121-125. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2067615. eCollection 2022.
4
Prospective evaluation of PI-RADS v2 and quantitative MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in Indian men - East meets West.PI-RADS v2与定量MRI在印度男性临床显著性前列腺癌检测中的前瞻性评估——东方与西方的交汇
Arab J Urol. 2022 May 15;20(3):126-136. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2072141. eCollection 2022.
5
New Diagnostic Model for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naïve Men With PIRADS 3.针对活检初诊的PI-RADS 3级男性临床显著前列腺癌的新诊断模型
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 4;12:908956. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.908956. eCollection 2022.
6
More than Meets the Eye: Using Textural Analysis and Artificial Intelligence as Decision Support Tools in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis-A Systematic Review.表象之下:纹理分析和人工智能作为前列腺癌诊断决策支持工具的系统评价
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 16;12(6):983. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060983.
7
The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer depends on the affected region.多参数磁共振成像用于前列腺癌检测和定位的诊断准确性取决于受影响的区域。
BJUI Compass. 2020 Nov 28;2(3):178-187. doi: 10.1002/bco2.62. eCollection 2021 May.
8
Transperineal prostate biopsy identifies locations of clinically significant prostate cancer in men considering focal therapy with PI-RADS 3-5 regions of interest.经会阴前列腺活检可确定考虑对PI-RADS 3-5感兴趣区域进行聚焦治疗的男性患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌的位置。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Oct 5;2(6):395-401. doi: 10.1002/bco2.111. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study.多参数磁共振成像、镓前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描以及各自的定量参数在中高危组患者临床显著性前列腺癌检测与定位中的应用:一项印度人群研究
Indian J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;36(4):362-370. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
Multiparametric MRI and Radiomics in Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Literature.多参数磁共振成像与放射组学在前列腺癌中的应用:当前文献综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 3;11(10):1829. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101829.