Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford Center for Respiratory Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England; Oxford National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Center, Oxford, England.
Chest. 2019 Mar;155(3):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1034. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
The outcome of indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) use in hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is unclear. This study aimed to review the safety and feasibility of the IPC in patients with refractory HH.
A retrospective multicenter study of patients with HH from January 2010 to December 2016 was performed. Inclusion criteria were refractory HH treated with an IPC and an underlying diagnosis of cirrhosis. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, operative reports, and laboratory values. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate catheter time to removal. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate for independent predictors of pleurodesis and death.
Seventy-nine patients were identified from eight institutions. Indication for IPC placement was palliation in 58 patients (73%) and bridge to transplant in 21 patients (27%). The median in situ dwell time of all catheters was 156 days (range, 16-1,978 days). Eight patients (10%) were found to have pleural space infection, five of whom also had catheter-site cellulitis. Two patients (2.5%) died secondary to catheter-related sepsis. Catheter removal secondary to spontaneous pleurodesis was achieved in 22 patients (28%). Median time from catheter insertion to pleurodesis was 55 days (range, 10-370 days). Older age was an independent predictor of mortality on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.05; P = .01).
We present, to our knowledge, the first multicenter study examining outcomes related to IPC use in HH. Ten percent infection risk and 2.5% mortality were identified. IPC placement may be a reasonable clinical option for patients with refractory HH, but it is associated with significant adverse events in this morbid population.
留置胸腔导管(IPC)在肝性胸水(HH)中的应用效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在回顾分析 IPC 治疗难治性 HH 的安全性和可行性。
回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间,8 家中心收治的 79 例难治性 HH 患者,纳入标准为:经 IPC 治疗且存在肝硬化的 HH 患者。回顾性分析患者的人口统计学、手术报告和实验室检查结果。Kaplan-Meier 法估计导管拔除时间,Cox 比例风险模型评估预测胸腔粘连和死亡的独立因素。
8 家中心共纳入 79 例患者,58 例(73%)因姑息治疗而放置 IPC,21 例(27%)为移植桥接。所有导管的中位留置时间为 156 天(范围 16-1978 天)。8 例(10%)患者发生胸腔感染,其中 5 例伴有导管部位蜂窝织炎。2 例(2.5%)患者因导管相关性败血症死亡。22 例(28%)因自发性胸腔粘连而拔除导管。从导管插入到胸腔粘连的中位时间为 55 天(范围 10-370 天)。多因素分析显示,年龄较大是死亡的独立预测因素(风险比 1.05,P=0.01)。
我们首次报道了多中心研究结果,评估了 IPC 在 HH 中的应用效果。本研究发现,10%的患者发生感染,2.5%的患者死亡。对于难治性 HH 患者,IPC 可能是一种合理的临床选择,但在该高危人群中,IPC 与严重不良事件相关。