Suppr超能文献

在社交媒体上分享会议演示的演讲者幻灯片是否侵犯了知识产权或代表的权利?这取决于你问谁。

Is sharing speaker's slides from conference presentations on social media a breach of intellectual property or a delegate's right? Depends who you ask.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Newcastle Centre for Bowel Disease research group & Department of Colorectal Surgery, RVI, Newcastle Upon Tyne University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, England, UK.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Oct;58:22-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The contemporary practice of the sharing of speaker's slides from medical conference presentations is common but raises a number of complex ethical and legal questions. We investigated the views of a large group of international hernia surgeons to evaluate the comtemporary view on this topic.

METHODS

A questionnaire was widely promoted on Twitter and distributed by email to target the membership of the British and European Hernia Societies. Demographics and responses were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 185 respondents; 68 BHS email (37%), 76  EHS email (41%) and 41 respondents via Twitter (22%). 49 (34%) society members used social media for professional communication. 23 (56%) of Twitter respondents had posted speakers slides versus 5 (12%) from society members email respondents. A majority of respondents held the view that either the specific congress (37%) or individual speakers (24%) should set the rules on the distribution of speakers slides explicitly. 10 (24%) of Twitter respondents felt that sharing content violated intellectual property compared to 88 (61%) of email respondents.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary opinion regarding this subject differs depending on the modality of questionnaire and population interrogated. Respondents who use social media in their professional practice are more comfortable with the practice of sharing speaker's slides. Whilst, the sharing of speaker's slides is legal in Europe, but it may be good practice to seek consent and acknowledge the author in any communication.

摘要

背景

在医学会议演示中分享演讲者幻灯片的做法在当今很常见,但引发了许多复杂的伦理和法律问题。我们调查了一大群国际疝外科医生的观点,以评估他们对这个话题的看法。

方法

我们在 Twitter 上广泛推广了一份问卷,并通过电子邮件分发给英国和欧洲疝学会的会员。记录了人口统计数据和回复。

结果

共有 185 名受访者;英国疝学会电子邮件 68 份(37%),欧洲疝学会电子邮件 76 份(41%),Twitter 回复 41 份(22%)。49 名(34%)学会会员使用社交媒体进行专业交流。23 名(56%)Twitter 回复者发布过演讲者幻灯片,而电子邮件回复者中只有 5 名(12%)。大多数受访者认为,要么是特定的大会(37%),要么是个别演讲者(24%)应该明确制定关于演讲者幻灯片分发的规则。10 名(24%)Twitter 回复者认为分享内容侵犯了知识产权,而电子邮件回复者中有 88 名(61%)持这种观点。

结论

关于这个问题的当代观点因问卷的模式和调查的人群而异。在他们的专业实践中使用社交媒体的受访者对分享演讲者幻灯片的做法更能接受。虽然在欧洲,分享演讲者幻灯片是合法的,但在任何交流中寻求同意并承认作者都是一种良好的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验