Jones Chloe, Atkinson Patricia, Helen Cross J, Reilly Colin
Research Department, Young Epilepsy, Lingfield, Surrey RH7 6PW, UK; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Child Development Centre, Crawley Hospital, Crawley, West Sussex RH11 7DH, UK.
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Oct;87:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.044. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
The objective of this study was to systematically review research that has focused on knowledge of and attitudes towards epilepsy among teachers. Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases from 2000 to 2017 were searched. Cross-sectional and interventional studies were included and analyzed for quality. Thematic analysis was used to identify common themes in the results. Fifty-four eligible studies (17,256 total participants in 27 different countries) were identified in the search period including seven studies that focused on assessing attitudes and knowledge before and after an educational intervention. It was not possible to systematically analyze levels of knowledge and nature of attitudes because of the wide variety of mostly bespoke study specific instruments used. Few studies employed valid and reliable instruments. Thematic analysis revealed three main themes in the results: 1.) deficits in knowledge and negative attitudes were pervasive across all studies; 2.) teachers often had a negative attitude towards participation of children with epilepsy in physical activities/sport; and 3.) teachers often expressed limited knowledge of seizure management/emergency procedures. There was a lower level of knowledge and more negative attitudes among teachers towards epilepsy compared with other conditions. All studies focusing on interventions showed that at least some aspects of knowledge and attitudes improved as a result of teacher participation in an educational intervention, but study quality was universally rated as low. A higher level of education and experience of teaching a child with epilepsy was significantly associated with greater knowledge in a number of studies. Additionally, having experience of teaching a child with epilepsy and greater assessed knowledge of epilepsy were associated with more positive attitudes. The wide range of methods used makes it difficult to generalize regarding level of attitudes and knowledge among teachers towards epilepsy. Nevertheless, all studies indicate that there are some deficits in knowledge of and negative attitudes towards epilepsy among teachers. It would appear that knowledge and attitudes can be improved by educational interventions. Future research should focus on developing psychometrically sound assessment instruments that can be used globally and on identifying the most effective ways of delivering efficacious educational initiatives employing robust study designs.
本研究的目的是系统回顾聚焦于教师对癫痫的认知及态度的研究。检索了2000年至2017年的Embase、PubMed、PsycINFO、谷歌学术和考科蓝图书馆数据库。纳入横断面研究和干预性研究并分析其质量。采用主题分析法确定结果中的共同主题。在检索期间共识别出54项符合条件的研究(来自27个不同国家的17256名参与者),其中包括7项聚焦于评估教育干预前后态度和知识的研究。由于大多使用的是针对特定研究定制的各种工具,因此无法系统分析知识水平和态度性质。很少有研究采用有效且可靠的工具。主题分析在结果中揭示了三个主要主题:1.)知识缺陷和消极态度在所有研究中普遍存在;2.)教师通常对癫痫儿童参与体育活动/运动持消极态度;3.)教师对癫痫发作管理/应急程序的知识往往有限。与其他病症相比,教师对癫痫的知识水平较低且态度更消极。所有聚焦于干预措施的研究表明,由于教师参与教育干预,知识和态度的至少某些方面有所改善,但研究质量普遍被评为较低。在多项研究中,较高的教育水平和有教癫痫儿童的经验与更多的知识显著相关。此外,有教癫痫儿童的经验以及对癫痫有更高的评估知识与更积极的态度相关。所使用的方法种类繁多,难以概括教师对癫痫的态度和知识水平。然而,所有研究均表明教师对癫痫的知识存在一些缺陷且态度消极。看来教育干预可以改善知识和态度。未来的研究应侧重于开发可在全球使用的心理测量学上合理的评估工具,并确定采用稳健研究设计实施有效教育举措的最有效方法。