a Showa University , Tokyo , Japan.
b Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. , Osaka , Japan.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Dec;34(12):2105-2112. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1519317. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Augmentation therapy is an option for patients with major depressive disorder who do respond sufficiently to adequate dosages of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, but little is known about application of this strategy in everyday practice.
This prospective, multi-center, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole augmentation in Japanese patients with inadequate response to conventional antidepressant therapy in real-world clinical practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in the (Japanese version) Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to study end. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events.
There were 1103 patients in the safety population and 1090 patients in the effectiveness population. Mean change in the MADRS total score at study end was -14.9 ± 12.3 (p < .001 vs baseline). The remission rate increased from 34.5% at Month 6 to 43.3% at Month 12, suggesting additional benefit with continued treatment. The type of primary antidepressant (paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, milnacipran, duloxetine, mirtazapine, or escitalopram) had no influence on the effectiveness of aripiprazole augmentation therapy. A baseline MADRS total score of <33 points and an elapsed time of <176 days from an episode of depression to the start of aripiprazole treatment increased the likelihood of achieving remission; 24.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse event, but no new safety signals were identified.
Aripiprazole augmentation therapy appears to be effective and safe in Japanese patients with depression/depressive symptoms treated in everyday clinical practice, taking into account factors associated with achieving remission.
对于那些对充分剂量的选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂反应不足的重度抑郁症患者,可选择增效治疗。然而,增效治疗在实际临床应用中的应用情况知之甚少。
本项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究旨在探讨阿立哌唑增效治疗在日本接受常规抗抑郁药治疗反应不足的患者中的有效性和安全性。主要终点为从基线到研究结束时(日本版)蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分的平均变化。通过监测不良事件评估安全性。
安全性人群中有 1103 例患者,有效性人群中有 1090 例患者。研究结束时 MADRS 总分的平均变化为-14.9±12.3(p<0.001 与基线相比)。缓解率从第 6 个月的 34.5%增加到第 12 个月的 43.3%,表明继续治疗可带来额外获益。起始抗抑郁药的类型(帕罗西汀、氟伏沙明、舍曲林、米那普仑、度洛西汀、米氮平或艾司西酞普兰)对阿立哌唑增效治疗的有效性无影响。基线 MADRS 总分<33 分和从抑郁症发作到开始阿立哌唑治疗的时间<176 天,可增加达到缓解的可能性;24.8%的患者出现至少一次不良事件,但未发现新的安全性信号。
考虑到与缓解相关的因素,阿立哌唑增效治疗对日本接受日常临床实践治疗的抑郁症/抑郁症状患者似乎是有效且安全的。