McGinnis Debra
Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309 USA.
J Adult Dev. 2018;25(3):198-221. doi: 10.1007/s10804-018-9288-y. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Developmental midlife processes involve resilience, changing challenges, and perceptions of getting older. In Study I and II, the Managing Life Survey resulted in growth, managing uncertainty, objectivity, adversity, and strategy use subscales. In Study II, resilience subgroups were identified. High and non-religious resilience groups had significantly higher averages for MLS subscales, time orientations, grit, life satisfaction; and significantly lower averages for adversity and negative event scores, compared to other groups. Noteworthy findings herein consist of (1) differences across resilience groups, with spiritual strategies emerging as an important discriminator; (2) the role of future perspectives on well-being characterizing early midlife; (3) the influence of growth and purpose on well-being characterizing late midlife; and (4) the cumulative effect of education on life satisfaction in late midlife. The results herein are consistent with the psychological benefits of moderate levels of challenge; with developmental differences across early and late midlife, and with Socioemotional Selectivity Theory.
中年发展过程涉及适应力、不断变化的挑战以及对变老的认知。在研究I和II中,“管理生活调查”得出了成长、应对不确定性、客观性、逆境和策略运用等分量表。在研究II中,确定了适应力亚组。与其他组相比,高适应力组和非宗教适应力组在“管理生活调查”分量表、时间取向、毅力、生活满意度方面的平均分显著更高;而在逆境和负面事件得分方面的平均分显著更低。此处值得注意的发现包括:(1)各适应力组之间的差异,其中精神策略成为一个重要的区分因素;(2)未来视角对表征中年早期幸福感的作用;(3)成长和目标对表征中年晚期幸福感的影响;以及(4)教育对中年晚期生活满意度的累积效应。此处的结果与适度挑战水平带来的心理益处、中年早期和晚期的发展差异以及社会情感选择理论相一致。