Mogasale Vijayalaxmi V, Ramani Enusa, Mogasale Vittal, Park Ju Yeon, Wierzba Thomas F
Epidemiology Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Policy and Economic Research Department, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Jul 4;2018:9589208. doi: 10.1155/2018/9589208. eCollection 2018.
Unsafe water is a well-known risk for typhoid fever, but a pooled estimate of the population-level risk of typhoid fever resulting from exposure to unsafe water has not been quantified. An accurate estimation of the risk from unsafe water will be useful in demarcating high-risk populations, modeling typhoid disease burden, and targeting prevention and control activities.
We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies that measured the risk of typhoid fever associated with drinking unimproved water as per WHO-UNICEF's definition or drinking microbiologically unsafe water. The mean value for the pooled odds ratio from case-control studies was calculated using a random effects model. In addition to unimproved water and unsafe water, we also listed categories of other risk factors from the selected studies.
The search of published studies from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2013 in PubMed, Embase, and World Health Organization databases provided 779 publications, of which 12 case-control studies presented the odds of having typhoid fever for those exposed to unimproved or unsafe versus improved drinking water sources. The odds of typhoid fever among those exposed to unimproved or unsafe water ranged from 1.06 to 9.26 with case weighted mean of 2.44 (95% CI: 1.65-3.59). Besides water-related risk, the studies also identified other risk factors related to socioeconomic aspects, type of food consumption, knowledge and awareness about typhoid fever, and hygiene practices.
In this meta-analysis, we have quantified the pooled risk of typhoid fever among people exposed to unimproved or unsafe water which is almost two and a half times more than people who were not exposed to unimproved or unsafe water. However, caution should be exercised in applying the findings from this study in modeling typhoid fever disease burden at country, regional, and global levels as improved water does not always equate to safe water.
不安全饮用水是伤寒热的一个众所周知的风险因素,但接触不安全饮用水导致伤寒热的人群层面风险的汇总估计尚未得到量化。准确估计不安全饮用水带来的风险将有助于划定高风险人群、模拟伤寒疾病负担以及确定预防和控制活动的目标。
我们对观察性研究进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,这些研究测量了根据世界卫生组织-联合国儿童基金会的定义饮用未改善水或饮用微生物学上不安全的水与伤寒热相关的风险。使用随机效应模型计算病例对照研究中汇总比值比的平均值。除了未改善水和不安全水之外,我们还列出了所选研究中的其他风险因素类别。
在PubMed、Embase和世界卫生组织数据库中检索1990年1月1日至2013年12月31日发表的研究,共获得779篇出版物,其中12项病例对照研究呈现了接触未改善或不安全饮用水源与改善饮用水源的人群患伤寒热的几率。接触未改善或不安全水的人群患伤寒热的几率在1.06至9.26之间,病例加权平均值为2.44(95%置信区间:1.65 - 3.59)。除了与水相关的风险外,这些研究还确定了与社会经济方面、食物消费类型、对伤寒热的知识和认识以及卫生习惯相关的其他风险因素。
在这项荟萃分析中,我们已经量化了接触未改善或不安全水的人群中伤寒热的汇总风险,这几乎是未接触未改善或不安全水的人群的两倍半。然而,在将本研究结果应用于国家、区域和全球层面的伤寒热疾病负担模拟时应谨慎,因为改善后的水并不总是等同于安全的水。