Ye Wenjing, Guo Xuejun, Yang Tianyun, Han Fengfeng
Department of Respiration, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200092, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(7):4565-4573. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.151.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common and preventable. The long-term safety of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in COPD is still unclear and requires further investigation. This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of withdrawal of ICS use in COPD by examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparing their findings with those of "real-life" studies. Two independent reviewers searched for RCTs in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and in CINAHL. Searches were conducted by using controlled vocabulary and free-text aliases for corticosteroids, COPD, and RCTs in each database. Data extraction was also conducted by the two reviewers. The main outcomes were exacerbations, lung function, health-related quality of life, symptoms, and exercise capacity. To assess the effect of ICS withdrawal more comprehensively, we also searched for "real-life" studies, and explored the reasons for different results among different trials. We located five RCTs, which met the inclusion criteria, and two "real-life" studies. Due to definitional and other discrepancies among trials, we could not perform a meta-analysis. In the RCTs, exacerbation was reported as an outcome in four out of five RCTs. Only one study showed that the risk of exacerbation did not increase after ICS withdrawal. Decrease in lung function from baseline was found in the withdrawal group in four trials, but only three trials found a statistically significant difference. All five trials compared differences in health-related quality of life. Two trials did not find significant changes, while a small but statistically significant difference in favor of the ICS group was observed in the other trials. In contrast, in the two real-life studies, no differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) values and exacerbation rate were observed between patients who were and were not withdrawn from ICS treatment. We concluded that the effect of ICS withdrawal on patients with COPD may be dependent on disease severity, use of background long-acting bronchodilator medication, and whether COPD is combined with airway hyper-responsiveness, among other factors.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)很常见且可预防。吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)用于COPD的长期安全性仍不明确,需要进一步研究。本系统评价旨在通过审查随机对照试验(RCT)并将其结果与“真实生活”研究的结果进行比较,来确定停用ICS对COPD的影响。两名独立评价者在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane数据库和CINAHL中检索RCT。在每个数据库中,通过使用皮质类固醇、COPD和RCT的控制词汇和自由文本别名进行检索。数据提取也由这两名评价者进行。主要结局包括急性加重、肺功能、健康相关生活质量、症状和运动能力。为了更全面地评估停用ICS的效果,我们还检索了“真实生活”研究,并探讨了不同试验结果不同的原因。我们找到了五项符合纳入标准的RCT和两项“真实生活”研究。由于试验之间存在定义和其他差异,我们无法进行荟萃分析。在RCT中,五项RCT中有四项将急性加重作为结局报告。只有一项研究表明,停用ICS后急性加重风险没有增加。四项试验中,撤药组的肺功能较基线下降,但只有三项试验发现有统计学意义的差异。所有五项试验都比较了健康相关生活质量的差异。两项试验未发现显著变化,而其他试验中观察到有利于ICS组的微小但有统计学意义的差异。相比之下,在两项“真实生活”研究中,接受和未接受ICS治疗的患者之间,第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)值和急性加重率没有差异。我们得出结论,停用ICS对COPD患者的影响可能取决于疾病严重程度、背景长效支气管扩张剂药物的使用以及COPD是否合并气道高反应性等因素。