Vingender Szonja, Restár László, Csomó Krisztián Benedek, Schmidt Péter, Hermann Péter, Vaszilkó Mihály
Arc-, Állcsont-, Szájsebészeti és Fogászati Klinika, Semmelweis Egyetem, Fogorvostudományi Kar Budapest.
Fogpótlástani Klinika, Semmelweis Egyetem, Fogorvostudományi Kar Budapest.
Orv Hetil. 2018 Sep;159(36):1475-1482. doi: 10.1556/650.2018.31138.
Derangement of the temporomandibular joint complicates everyday life, due to the masticatory malfunction and the continuous pain sensation of the head and facial region. The therapy is multidisciplinary and varying. In case of the inefficiency of conservative therapy, minimally invasive intervention is needed with intraarticular injection.
The aim of our study was to examine whether hyaluronic acid injection is more beneficial compared to corticosteroid in 37 joints. We also examined whether the efficacy of the therapy is influenced by hyaluronic acid molecular weight and the used protocol.
Wilkes stage, maximal mouth opening and the Visual Analogue Scale were determined pre-operatively and 6 months later. Corticosteroid application was performed once, hyaluronic acid was injected on a weekly bases 3 times in a row, by use of low (6-10 × 10 dalton) or high molecular weight (24-36 × 10 dalton) preparations.
The medical state of the patients treated with corticosteroid temporarily improved, but the symptoms returned. Due to hyaluronic acid treatment, significant improvement was revealed in all parameters (p<0.0001; p = 0.0002; p<0.0001). There was no significant relapse (T = 2.05). The third administration of hyaluronic acid resulted in a significant improvement of the Visual Analogue Scale compared to the first and second injection (T = 20.37; T = 9.57).
Comparing the two agents we can state that hyaluronic acid was significantly more effective and its application for three times seems to be the most effective treatment decreasing the symptoms. The high molecular weight solution was more effective in increasing mouth opening. In contrast to hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid had no prolonged effect in higher Wilkes stages. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(36): 1475-1482.
颞下颌关节紊乱会使日常生活变得复杂,因为咀嚼功能出现故障,且头面部区域持续疼痛。治疗是多学科且多样的。在保守治疗无效的情况下,需要进行关节内注射的微创干预。
我们研究的目的是检验在37个关节中,透明质酸注射是否比皮质类固醇更有益。我们还研究了治疗效果是否受透明质酸分子量和所用方案的影响。
术前及6个月后测定威尔克斯分期、最大开口度和视觉模拟评分。皮质类固醇应用一次,透明质酸每周连续注射3次,使用低分子量(6 - 10×10道尔顿)或高分子量(24 - 36×10道尔顿)制剂。
接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者的病情暂时改善,但症状复发。由于透明质酸治疗,所有参数均有显著改善(p<0.0001;p = 0.0002;p<0.0001)。没有明显复发(T = 2.05)。与第一次和第二次注射相比,第三次注射透明质酸后视觉模拟评分有显著改善(T = 20.37;T = 9.57)。
比较这两种药物,我们可以得出结论,透明质酸明显更有效,连续注射3次似乎是减轻症状最有效的治疗方法。高分子量溶液在增加开口度方面更有效。与透明质酸不同,皮质类固醇在威尔克斯分期较高时没有长期效果。《匈牙利医学周报》。2018年;159(36): 1475 - 1482。