• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构设计对肩袖修复缝合锚钉拔出强度的影响。

Effect of structural design on the pullout strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.

作者信息

Chae Soo-Won, Kang Ju-Yong, Lee Juneyoung, Han Seung-Ho, Kim Soung-Yon

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2018 Dec;36(12):3318-3327. doi: 10.1002/jor.24135. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1002/jor.24135
PMID:30175855
Abstract

Various types of suture anchor designs are currently available for rotator cuff repair. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pullout strength of such anchors based on their structural design and the predominant geometric design factors affecting the pullout strength using finite element analysis. Finite element models were constructed using five cadaveric humeri and ten suture anchors with different designs. The pullout strength and distribution of bone stress around the anchor at three different directions of the applied force (0°, 45°, and 75°) were analyzed. The following geometric factors of suture anchor design were computed and their correlations with pullout strength assessed: Overall length, minor, and major diameters; number of threads; height of thread; distance between threads; helix angle; contact surface area between the anchor threads and surrounding bone; contact surface area between the cylindrical portion of the anchor; and surrounding bone and total contact surface area between the anchor and surrounding bone. The pullout strength and distribution of bone stress around the anchor varied according to the suture anchor designs and the direction of the applied force, respectively. The pullout strength had a strong positive correlation with the contact surface area between the anchor threads and surrounding bone, overall length, and the number and height of threads. This study demonstrated that suture anchor designs with increased contact surface area between the anchor threads and surrounding bone, overall length, and the number and height of threads can enhance the pullout strength during rotator cuff repair. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3318-3327, 2018.

摘要

目前有多种类型的缝合锚设计可用于肩袖修复。我们研究的目的是基于其结构设计以及使用有限元分析来研究影响拔出强度的主要几何设计因素,从而探究此类锚的拔出强度。使用五具尸体肱骨和十种不同设计的缝合锚构建有限元模型。分析了在三个不同施力方向(0°、45°和75°)下锚周围的拔出强度和骨应力分布。计算了缝合锚设计的以下几何因素,并评估了它们与拔出强度的相关性:总长、小径和大径;螺纹数量;螺纹高度;螺纹间距;螺旋角;锚螺纹与周围骨之间的接触表面积;锚圆柱部分与周围骨之间的接触表面积;以及锚与周围骨之间的总接触表面积。锚周围的拔出强度和骨应力分布分别根据缝合锚设计和施力方向而变化。拔出强度与锚螺纹与周围骨之间的接触表面积、总长以及螺纹数量和高度呈强正相关。本研究表明,在肩袖修复过程中,增加锚螺纹与周围骨之间的接触表面积、总长以及螺纹数量和高度的缝合锚设计可以提高拔出强度。©2018骨科研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科学研究》2018年第36卷:3318 - 3327页。

相似文献

1
Effect of structural design on the pullout strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.结构设计对肩袖修复缝合锚钉拔出强度的影响。
J Orthop Res. 2018 Dec;36(12):3318-3327. doi: 10.1002/jor.24135. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Pullout strength of standard vs. cement-augmented rotator cuff repair anchors in cadaveric bone.标准型与骨水泥增强型肩袖修复锚钉在尸体骨中的拔出强度
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 May;54:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Comparison of fixation properties between coil-type and screw-type anchors for rotator cuff repair: A virtual pullout testing using 3-dimensional finite element method.用于肩袖修复的线圈型和螺钉型锚钉固定特性的比较:使用三维有限元法的虚拟拔出试验。
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Jul;21(4):452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
4
Pullout strength of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair.用于肩袖修复的缝合锚钉的拔出强度。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Nov;85(11):2190-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200311000-00021.
5
Suture anchor fixation strength in osteopenic versus non-osteopenic bone for rotator cuff repair.用于肩袖修复的骨质疏松性骨与非骨质疏松性骨中缝线锚钉固定强度的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Mar;129(3):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0689-4. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
6
All-suture anchor pullout results in decreased bone damage and depends on cortical thickness.全缝线锚钉固定的拔出力可减少骨损伤,且与皮质骨厚度相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2212-2219. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06004-6. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
7
Predicting failures of suture anchors used for rotator cuff repair: a CT-based 3-dimensional finite element analysis.预测用于肩袖修复的缝合锚钉失效:基于CT的三维有限元分析。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;25(4):371-80. doi: 10.3233/BME-151535.
8
The incidence of early metallic suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期金属缝线锚钉拔出的发生率。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar;26(3):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.015. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
9
Cement augmentation of suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair improves pullout strength: a systematic review.在肩袖修复过程中,使用骨水泥增强缝合锚钉可提高肱骨近端的拔出强度:一项系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2021 Nov;6(6):349-355. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000603. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
10
Pullout strength of suture anchors in comparison with transosseous sutures for rotator cuff repair.肩袖修复中缝线锚钉与经骨缝线的拔出强度比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 May;16(5):504-10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0460-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Analysis of Suture Anchor Pull-Out Strength with Cortical Bone Thickness and Cancellous Bone Density on a Finite Element Model.有限元模型上缝合锚钉拔出强度与皮质骨厚度和松质骨密度的相关性分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;12(8):863. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080863.
2
Assessing the application of barbed sutures in comparison to conventional sutures for surgical applications: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies.评估医用缝合线在外科手术应用中的对比效果:全球系统评价和临床前动物研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3060-3071. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001230.
3
Arthroscopic transosseous anchorless rotator cuff repair reduces bone defects related to peri-implant cyst formation: a comparison with conventional suture anchors using propensity score matching.
关节镜下经骨无锚钉肩袖修复术可减少与种植体周围囊肿形成相关的骨缺损:与使用倾向评分匹配的传统缝线锚钉的比较
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Sep;26(3):276-286. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00052. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
An Injectable Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Substitute Improves the Pullout Strength of Various Suture Anchor Designs in an Osteoporotic Bone Model.一种可注射磷酸钙骨移植替代物可提高骨质疏松骨模型中各种缝合锚设计的拔出强度。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 15;5(2):e423-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.010. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Local Intraoperative Marrow-Derived Augmentation for Primary Rotator Cuff Repair: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies From 2010 to 2022.原发性肩袖修复术中局部术中骨髓衍生增强术:2010年至2022年研究的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Mar 28;11(3):23259671221147896. doi: 10.1177/23259671221147896. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Evidence for Utilization of Injectable Biologic Augmentation in Primary Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Data From 2010 to 2022.原发性肩袖修复中使用可注射生物增强剂的证据:对2010年至2022年数据的系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 3;11(2):23259671221150037. doi: 10.1177/23259671221150037. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术中缝线锚钉拔出的危险因素及相应处理
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 21;11(22):6870. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226870.
8
Development of a Novel Hybrid Suture Anchor for Osteoporosis by Integrating Titanium 3D Printing and Traditional Machining.通过整合钛3D打印和传统加工技术开发用于骨质疏松症的新型混合缝合锚钉。
Int J Bioprint. 2022 Aug 26;8(4):608. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i4.608. eCollection 2022.
9
Biomechanical properties of a suture anchor system from human allogenic mineralized cortical bone matrix for rotator cuff repair.用于肩袖修复的异体矿化皮质骨基质缝线锚钉系统的生物力学性能。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 5;23(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05371-0.
10
Biocompatibility and Biological Performance Evaluation of Additive-Manufactured Bioabsorbable Iron-Based Porous Suture Anchor in a Rabbit Model.增材制造可吸收铁基多孔缝合锚钉的生物相容性和生物学性能评价:兔模型研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 8;22(14):7368. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147368.