• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种可注射磷酸钙骨移植替代物可提高骨质疏松骨模型中各种缝合锚设计的拔出强度。

An Injectable Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Substitute Improves the Pullout Strength of Various Suture Anchor Designs in an Osteoporotic Bone Model.

作者信息

Diaz Miguel A, Munassi Steven, Teytelbaum David E, Pipitone Anthony, Baker Christopher E

机构信息

Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.

Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 15;5(2):e423-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.010. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.010
PMID:37101877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10123442/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare various suture anchor designs with and without calcium phosphate (CaP) augmentation in an osteoporotic foam block model and decorticated proximal humerus cadaveric model.

METHODS

This was a controlled biomechanical study, consisting of 2 parts: (1) an osteoporotic foam block model (0.12 g/cc; n = 42) and (2) a matched pair cadaveric humeral model (n = 24). Suture anchors selected were an all-suture anchor, PEEK (polyether ether ketone)-threaded anchor, and a biocomposite-threaded anchor. For each study arm, one half the samples were first filled with injectable CaP and the other half were not augmented with CaP. For the cadaveric portion, the PEEK- and biocomposite-threaded anchors were assessed. Biomechanical testing consisted of a stepwise, increasing load protocol for a total of 40 cycles, followed by ramp to failure.

RESULTS

For the foam block model, the average load to failure for anchors with CaP was significantly greater when compared with anchor fixation augmented without CaP; the all-suture anchor was 135.2 ± 20.2 N versus 83.3 ± 10.3 N ( = .0006); PEEK was 131 ± 34.3 N versus 58.5 ± 16.8 N ( = .001); and biocomposite was 182.2 ± 64.2 N versus 80.8 ± 17.4 N ( = .004). For the cadaveric model, the average load to failure for anchors augmented with CaP was again greater than anchor fixation without CaP; PEEK anchors went from 41.1 ± 21.1 N to 193.6 ± 63.9 N ( = .0034) and biocomposite anchors went from 70.9 ± 26.6 N to 143.2 ± 28.9 N ( = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmenting various suture anchors with CaP has shown to significantly increase pull-out strength and stiffness in an osteoporotic foam block and time zero cadaveric bone model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Rotator cuff tears are common in the elderly patients, in whom poor bone quality jeopardizes treatment success. Exploring methods that increase the strength of fixation in osteoporotic bone to improve outcomes in this patient population is important.

摘要

目的

在骨质疏松泡沫块模型和去皮质肱骨近端尸体模型中,比较有和没有磷酸钙(CaP)增强的各种缝线锚钉设计。

方法

这是一项对照生物力学研究,包括2部分:(1)骨质疏松泡沫块模型(0.12 g/cc;n = 42)和(2)匹配对尸体肱骨模型(n = 24)。选择的缝线锚钉为全缝线锚钉、聚醚醚酮(PEEK)螺纹锚钉和生物复合材料螺纹锚钉。对于每个研究组,一半的样本首先填充可注射CaP,另一半不进行CaP增强。对于尸体部分,评估PEEK和生物复合材料螺纹锚钉。生物力学测试包括逐步增加负荷方案,共40个循环,然后斜坡加载至破坏。

结果

对于泡沫块模型,与未进行CaP增强的锚钉固定相比,进行CaP增强的锚钉的平均破坏负荷显著更高;全缝线锚钉为135.2±20.2 N,而未增强的为83.3±10.3 N(P = .0006);PEEK为131±34.3 N,而未增强的为58.5±16.8 N(P = .001);生物复合材料为182.2±64.2 N,而未增强的为80.8±17.4 N(P = .004)。对于尸体模型,进行CaP增强的锚钉的平均破坏负荷再次高于未进行CaP增强的锚钉固定;PEEK锚钉从41.1±21.1 N增加到193.6±63.9 N(P = .0034),生物复合材料锚钉从70.9±26.6 N增加到143.2±28.9 N(P = .004)。

结论

在骨质疏松泡沫块和新鲜尸体骨模型中,用CaP增强各种缝线锚钉已显示出可显著提高拔出强度和刚度。

临床意义

肩袖撕裂在老年患者中很常见,这些患者骨质较差会危及治疗成功。探索提高骨质疏松骨固定强度的方法以改善该患者群体的治疗效果很重要。

相似文献

1
An Injectable Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Substitute Improves the Pullout Strength of Various Suture Anchor Designs in an Osteoporotic Bone Model.一种可注射磷酸钙骨移植替代物可提高骨质疏松骨模型中各种缝合锚设计的拔出强度。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 15;5(2):e423-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.010. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Calcium Phosphate Bone Void Filler Increases Threaded Suture Anchor Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Study.钙磷酸盐骨空隙填充剂增加带螺纹缝线锚钉拔出强度:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36(4):1000-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Pullout strength of standard vs. cement-augmented rotator cuff repair anchors in cadaveric bone.标准型与骨水泥增强型肩袖修复锚钉在尸体骨中的拔出强度
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 May;54:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Cement augmentation of suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair improves pullout strength: a systematic review.在肩袖修复过程中,使用骨水泥增强缝合锚钉可提高肱骨近端的拔出强度:一项系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2021 Nov;6(6):349-355. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000603. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
5
Increasing pullout strength of suture anchors in osteoporotic bone using augmentation--a cadaver study.使用增强技术提高骨质疏松性骨中缝合锚钉的拔出强度——一项尸体研究
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Mar;30(3):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update.肩袖和盂唇锚定物的拔出强度的循环加载生物力学分析:2013 更新版。
Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):832-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
7
Cyclic biomechanical testing of biocomposite lateral row knotless anchors in a human cadaveric model.在人体尸体模型中对生物复合材料侧排无结锚进行循环生物力学测试。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1012-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
8
When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.
9
Bioabsorbable tricalcium phosphate bone cement strengthens fixation of suture anchors.可吸收性磷酸三钙骨水泥增强缝线锚钉固定强度。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3406-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1412-7. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
10
Augmentation of suture anchors with magnesium phosphate cement - Simple technique with striking effect.镁磷灰石水泥增强缝合锚钉 - 简单技术,显著效果。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Apr;128:105096. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105096. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum 15-year follow-up for clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜肩袖修复的临床结果至少随访 15 年。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Aug;31(8):1696-1703. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.116. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
Large Footprint Bone Cyst: Arthroscopic Autologous Cylinder Press-Fit with Buddy Anchor Interference-Fit for Rotator Cuff Repairt.大足迹骨囊肿:关节镜下自体圆柱压配合伴锚钉干涉配合用于肩袖修复
J Orthop Case Rep. 2021 Aug;11(8):71-74. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i08.2372.
3
Cement augmentation of suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair improves pullout strength: a systematic review.在肩袖修复过程中,使用骨水泥增强缝合锚钉可提高肱骨近端的拔出强度:一项系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2021 Nov;6(6):349-355. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000603. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Better Short-Term Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair in Studies With Poorer Mean Shoulder Scores and Predominantly Small to Medium-Sized Tears at Baseline: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基线时肩功能平均评分较差且主要为小至中等大小撕裂的研究中,肩袖修复的短期转归更好:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Mar;38(3):967-979.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
"Current concepts and expert practice report: Augmentation of rotator cuff repairs".当前概念与专家实践报告:肩袖修补术的增强
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 21;19:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.016. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Cyclic and Load-to-Failure Properties of All-Suture Anchors in Human Cadaveric Shoulder Greater Tuberosities.全缝线锚钉在人体肩大结节的循环和失效负载特性。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Nov;36(11):2805-2811. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Calcium Phosphate Bone Void Filler Increases Threaded Suture Anchor Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Study.钙磷酸盐骨空隙填充剂增加带螺纹缝线锚钉拔出强度:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36(4):1000-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.传统肩袖与全缝线锚钉的比较-在无限循环模型中关注置入角度的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225648. eCollection 2019.
9
Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense? A Systematic Review.老年人肩袖撕裂的修复:是否合理?系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):744-753. doi: 10.1177/0363546519834574. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Surgical Considerations in Managing Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Vitamin D Deficiency During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术中骨质疏松、骨质减少和维生素D缺乏的外科治疗考量
Orthop Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;50(2):233-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2018.10.006.