• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童的理性高阶信念修正。

Rational Higher-Order Belief Revision in Young Children.

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):91-97. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13143. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.13143
PMID:30176052
Abstract

Belief revision can occur at multiple levels of abstraction, including lower-level and higher-order beliefs. It remains unclear, however, how conflicting evidence interacts with prior beliefs to encourage higher-order belief revision. This study explores how 4- and 5-year-olds (N = 96) respond to evidence that directly conflicts with their causal higher-order beliefs. When shown a single event that directly violated a strongly supported prior belief, preschoolers largely maintained their initial higher-order belief. However, when the prior belief was more weakly supported and the counterevidence was stronger, children changed their minds. These findings indicate that young children can revise their higher-order beliefs and, furthermore, do so depending on the strength of both the evidence and their prior beliefs.

摘要

信念修正可以在多个抽象层次上发生,包括较低层次和较高层次的信念。然而,目前尚不清楚冲突的证据如何与先前的信念相互作用,以鼓励更高层次的信念修正。本研究探讨了 4 至 5 岁儿童(N=96)如何应对与他们的因果关系高阶信念直接冲突的证据。当呈现一个单一的事件,直接违反了一个强烈支持的先验信念,学龄前儿童在很大程度上保持了他们最初的高阶信念。然而,当先验信念的支持较弱,而反证据较强时,儿童就会改变主意。这些发现表明,年幼的孩子可以修正他们的高阶信念,而且,他们会根据证据和他们先验信念的强度来进行修正。

相似文献

1
Rational Higher-Order Belief Revision in Young Children.儿童的理性高阶信念修正。
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):91-97. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13143. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
2
Children Prefer Diverse Samples for Inductive Reasoning in the Social Domain.儿童在社会领域的归纳推理中更喜欢多样化的样本。
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1090-8. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12522. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
3
Explaining Constrains Causal Learning in Childhood.解释儿童期的约束因果学习
Child Dev. 2017 Jan;88(1):229-246. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12590. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Young Children From Three Diverse Cultures Spontaneously and Consistently Prepare for Alternative Future Possibilities.三个不同文化背景的幼儿自发且一致地为未来的各种可能性做准备。
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):51-61. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13084. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
Children's understanding of second-order mental states.儿童对二阶心理状态的理解。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;135(5):749-73. doi: 10.1037/a0016854.
6
Spatial activity participation in childhood and adolescence: consistency and relations to spatial thinking in adolescence.儿童和青少年的空间活动参与:一致性与青少年空间思维的关系。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Sep 16;5(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00239-0.
7
The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.工具使用的发展:为最终状态的舒适而规划。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Nov;52(11):1878-1892. doi: 10.1037/dev0000207.
8
Children's behavior and spontaneous talk in a future thinking task.儿童在未来思考任务中的行为与自发言语。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jun;83(4):761-773. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1089-1. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Individual differences and age-related changes in divergent thinking in toddlers and preschoolers.幼儿和学龄前儿童发散思维的个体差异和年龄变化。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jun;50(6):1629-39. doi: 10.1037/a0036131. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
How children revise their beliefs in light of reasons.儿童如何根据理由修正自己的信念。
Child Dev. 2022 Jul;93(4):1072-1089. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13758. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Preschoolers use probabilistic evidence to flexibly change or maintain expectations on an active search task.学龄前儿童在一项主动搜索任务中利用概率证据来灵活地改变或维持预期。
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):881-890. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14190. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Great apes and human children rationally monitor their decisions.大型猿类和人类儿童会理性地监控自己的决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 30;289(1971):20212686. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2686. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Developmental Trajectories in Diagnostic Reasoning: Understanding Data Are Confounded Develops Independently of Choosing Informative Interventions to Resolve Confounded Data.
诊断推理中的发展轨迹:理解数据混淆的发展独立于选择信息性干预措施来解决混淆数据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 15;13:800226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800226. eCollection 2022.
4
Retrospective inferences in selective trust.选择性信任中的回顾性推断。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Feb 26;7(2):191451. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191451. eCollection 2020 Feb.