Agostini Aubert, Godard Chloé, Laurendeau Caroline, Benmahmoud Amel, Lafuma Antoine, Doz Marianne, Lévy-Bachelot Laurie, Gourmelen Julie, Linet Teddy
Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de la Conception, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Laboratoire MSD France, 34 Avenue Léonard de Vinci, 92418 Courbevoie, France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
To assess the effectiveness and costs associated with contraceptive methods based on real-world data in France.
A cross-sectional cohort study based on data from a representative sample of the French National Healthcare Insurance Database (Echantillon Généralistes des Bénéficiaires (EGB)) was performed between January 1st 2006 and December 31st 2012. Women aged 15 years or older and users of at least one reimbursed contraceptive method between January 1st 2012 and December 31st 2012 were selected. The outcome of interest was unintended pregnancy, defined as pregnancies occurring after at least one month since the dispensation of a contraceptive method. The mean annual costs of contraceptive methods (in 2012 Euros) were collected in the database from a health system perspective. Costs were expressed for the first year of use, considering the next years of use and taking into account or not the cost of unplanned pregnancies.
A population of 48,090 women representative of the 4,664,730 French women with a reimbursed contraceptive method was identified in the EGB in 2012: 68.6% used at least one reimbursed oral contraception (OC), 30.2% used at least one intrauterine devices (IUD) (LGN-IUS 52 mg, 17.6%; copper, 13.1%) and 5.1% used at least one etonogestrel implant. Unplanned pregnancies rates ranged from 0.6% with LNG-IUS 52 mg and 0.8% with the etonogestrel implant to 4.8% with 1st and 2nd generation combined OCs. The mean annual costs of contraception for the first year of use ranged from €145 for 1st-2nd generation combined oral contraceptions (COCs) to €308 for LNG-IUS 52 mg taking into account the next years of use, the etonogestrel implant was associated with the lowest mean annual cost (€88). When costs of unplanned pregnancies were taken into account, the mean annual cost of contraception for the first year of use was lower for progestin-only OC (€251) and copper IUD (€257) compared to etonogestrel implant (€300) and LNG-IUS 52 mg(€323).
This real-world study suggests that Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) (i.e. implant and IUDs) should be considered for a broader use to prevent unplanned pregnancies and related abortions in France both from a public health and economic perspective.
基于法国的真实世界数据评估避孕方法的有效性和成本。
基于法国国家医疗保险数据库(参保人全科样本(EGB))的代表性样本数据进行了一项横断面队列研究,研究时间为2006年1月1日至2012年12月31日。选取年龄在15岁及以上且在2012年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间使用至少一种报销避孕方法的女性。感兴趣的结局是意外怀孕,定义为在使用避孕方法至少一个月后发生的怀孕。从卫生系统角度在数据库中收集了避孕方法的年均成本(以2012年欧元计)。成本按使用的第一年表示,考虑到后续使用年份,并考虑或不考虑意外怀孕的成本。
2012年在EGB中确定了48,090名女性,她们代表了4,664,730名使用报销避孕方法的法国女性:68.6%使用至少一种报销的口服避孕药(OC),30.2%使用至少一种宫内节育器(IUD)(左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统52mg,17.6%;铜质,13.1%),5.1%使用至少一种依托孕烯植入剂。意外怀孕率从左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统52mg的0.6%和依托孕烯植入剂的0.8%到第一代和第二代复方口服避孕药的4.8%不等。考虑到后续使用年份,使用第一年的避孕年均成本从第一代至第二代复方口服避孕药(COC)的145欧元到左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统52mg的308欧元不等,依托孕烯植入剂的年均成本最低(88欧元)。当考虑意外怀孕成本时,与依托孕烯植入剂(300欧元)和左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统52mg(323欧元)相比,仅含孕激素的口服避孕药(251欧元)和铜质宫内节育器(257欧元)使用第一年的避孕年均成本更低。
这项真实世界研究表明,从公共卫生和经济角度来看,长效可逆避孕方法(LARC,即植入剂和宫内节育器)在法国应被更广泛地用于预防意外怀孕及相关流产。