Pashkov Vitalii, Lyfar Anna
Poltava Law Institute Of Yaroslav Mudriy National Law University, Poltava, Ukraine.
Wiad Lek. 2018;71(5):1066-1070.
Introduction: Today, the use of assisted reproductive technologies (including surrogacy) is an effective method of guaranteeing realization of person's right on maternity or paternity. Through therapeutic efficiency reproductive means have become incredibly popular among population. However, the lack of certain legal relations in the sphere of surrogacy (both at the international level and the national one) leads to the confusion in the theory and practice. The aim: In this article, the author has set himself the following aims: a) to determine the state of legal regulation of surrogate maternity at national and international levels; b) to focus on problematic moments in legal regulation of surrogacy, which cause such phenomena as medical tourism and human trafficking; c) to investigate the regimes of legal regulation of surrogacy in the countries of the world.
Materials and methods: The methodological framework of the research consists of general scientific and special methods. The dialectical method is used to identify the term surrogacy and its meaning; the method of summarization is applied to the case laws (judgements of European Court of Human Rights and other high legislative bodies of foreign countries). The statistical method is applied to statistical data; the formal method is used for analysing the experience of such foreign countries as the USA (state Illinois, Nevada, California), Sweden, the Netherlands, India, Great Britain. Lastly, the method of comparison is applied to determine the similarities or differences between domestic and foreign legislation.
Review: There are three regimes of surrogacy in the world which contradict one another (altruistic, permitting and prohibiting). The difference between legal regulations of surrogacy contributes expansion of such a phenomenon as medical tourism.
Conclusions: Owing to absence of unified principles and standards on international level in the sphere of surrogacy, subjects of such legal relations are absolutely unprotected. Such phenomena as medical tourism, human trafficking and commercial exploitation of surrogate mothers are extending.
引言:如今,辅助生殖技术(包括代孕)的使用是保障人们生育权得以实现的一种有效方法。通过治疗手段,生殖方式在人群中变得极其流行。然而,代孕领域(无论是国际层面还是国家层面)某些法律关系的缺失导致了理论和实践中的混乱。目标:在本文中,作者设定了以下目标:a)确定国家和国际层面代孕母亲法律监管的状况;b)关注代孕法律监管中导致医疗旅游和人口贩卖等现象的问题点;c)研究世界各国代孕的法律监管制度。
材料与方法:该研究的方法框架由一般科学方法和特殊方法组成。运用辩证方法来确定代孕这一术语及其含义;运用归纳方法来研究判例法(欧洲人权法院及其他外国高级立法机构的判决)。运用统计方法处理统计数据;运用形式方法分析美国(伊利诺伊州、内华达州、加利福尼亚州)、瑞典、荷兰、印度、英国等外国的经验。最后,运用比较方法来确定国内外立法之间的异同。
综述:世界上存在三种相互矛盾的代孕制度(利他性、允许性和禁止性)。代孕法律规定的差异助长了医疗旅游这种现象的扩张。
结论:由于代孕领域在国际层面缺乏统一的原则和标准,此类法律关系的主体完全得不到保护。医疗旅游、人口贩卖和代孕母亲的商业剥削等现象正在蔓延。