Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic, and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University, 00198 Rome, Italy.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 8;57(1):47. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010047.
: To explore the ethical and legal complexities arising from the controversial issue of surrogacy, particularly in terms of how they affect fundamental rights of children and parents. Surrogacy is a form of medically-assisted procreation (MAP) in which a woman "lends" her uterus to carry out a pregnancy on behalf of a third party. There are pathological conditions, such as uterine agenesis or hysterectomy outcomes, that may prevent prospective mothers from becoming pregnant or carry a pregnancy to term; such patients may consider finding a surrogate mother. Many issues relating to surrogacy remain unresolved, with significant disagreements and controversy within the scientific community and public opinion. There are several factors called into play and multiple parties and stakeholders whose objectives and interests need to somehow be reconciled. First and foremost, the authors contend, it is essential to prioritize and uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy and heterologous MAP. : To draw a parallel between Italy and the rest of the world, the legislation in force in twelve European countries was analyzed, eleven of which are part of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Portugal) and three non-members of the same (United Kingdom, Ukraine and Russia), as well as that of twelve non-European countries considered exemplary (United States, Canada, Australia, India, China, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and South Africa); in particular, legislative sources and legal databases were drawn upon, in order to draw a comparison with the Italian legislation currently in force and map out the evolution of the Italian case law on the basis of the judgments issued by Italian courts, including the Constitutional and Supreme Courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); search engines such as PubMed and Google Scholar were also used, by entering the keywords "surrogacy" and "surrogate motherhood", to find scientific articles concerning assisted reproduction techniques with a close focus on surrogacy. : SM is a prohibited and sanctioned practice in Italy; on the other hand, it is allowed in other countries of the world, which leads Italian couples, or couples from other countries where it is banned, to often contact foreign centers in order to undertake a MAP pathway which includes surrogacy; in addition, challenges may arise from the legal status of children born through surrogacy abroad: to date, in most countries, there is no specific legislation aimed at regulating their legal registration and parental status. : With reference to the Italian context, despite the scientific and legal evolution on the subject, a legislative intervention aimed at filling the regulatory gaps in terms of heterologous MAP and surrogacy has not yet come to fruition. Considering the possibility of "fertility tourism", i.e., traveling to countries where the practice is legal, as indeed already happens in a relatively significant number of cases, the current legislation, although integrated by the legal interpretation, does not appear to be effective in avoiding the phenomenon of procreative tourism. Moreover, to overcome some contradictions currently present between law 40 and law 194, it would be appropriate to outline an organic and exhaustive framework of rules, which should take into account the multiplicity of interests at stake, in keeping with a fair and sustainable balance when regulating such practices.
探讨代孕这一备受争议的问题所引发的伦理和法律复杂性,特别是其如何影响儿童和父母的基本权利。代孕是一种医学辅助生殖(MAP)形式,其中女性“借出”她的子宫代表第三方进行妊娠。存在病理性情况,如子宫发育不全或子宫切除术的结果,可能会阻止预期的母亲怀孕或足月妊娠;此类患者可能会考虑寻找代孕母亲。代孕仍存在许多悬而未决的问题,科学界和公众意见存在重大分歧和争议。有几个因素需要考虑,并且需要协调多个利益相关者的目标和利益。首先,作者认为,优先和维护通过代孕和异源 MAP 出生的儿童的权利至关重要。
为了在意大利和世界其他地区之间进行比较,分析了在 12 个欧洲国家(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、希腊、荷兰、比利时、丹麦、立陶宛、捷克共和国和葡萄牙)以及 3 个非欧盟成员国(英国、乌克兰和俄罗斯)现行的立法,以及 12 个被认为是典范的非欧洲国家(美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、印度、中国、泰国、以色列、尼日利亚和南非)的立法;特别参考了立法来源和法律数据库,以便与意大利现行立法进行比较,并根据意大利法院发布的判决(包括宪法法院和最高法院以及欧洲人权法院),对意大利关于代孕的判例法的演变进行了梳理;还使用了 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 等搜索引擎,输入“代孕”和“代孕母亲”等关键词,以找到有关辅助生殖技术的科学文章,重点关注代孕。
在意大利,SM 是一种被禁止和制裁的做法;另一方面,在世界上的其他国家,它是被允许的,这导致意大利夫妇,或其他禁止代孕的国家的夫妇,经常联系外国中心,以便进行包括代孕在内的 MAP 途径;此外,在国外代孕出生的儿童的法律地位也可能带来挑战:迄今为止,在大多数国家,没有专门的立法来规范他们的合法登记和父母身份。
在意大利背景下,尽管在这个问题上有了科学和法律的发展,但针对异源 MAP 和代孕方面的监管空白,立法干预尚未实现。考虑到“生育旅游”的可能性,即前往允许这种做法的国家旅行,事实上已经有相当多的案例发生,目前的立法虽然通过法律解释得到了补充,但似乎并不能有效避免生殖旅游的现象。此外,为了克服目前第 40 号法和第 194 号法之间存在的一些矛盾,有必要制定一个有机和详尽的规则框架,该框架应考虑到所涉利益的多样性,在规范此类做法时保持公平和可持续的平衡。