• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives?代孕与“生育旅游”。从伦理和法律角度看未来会怎样?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 8;57(1):47. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010047.
2
The legally charged issue of cross-border surrogacy: Current regulatory challenges and future prospects.跨境代孕的法律争议问题:当前的监管挑战与未来展望。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Sep;300:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
3
Parents' 'fault' must not weigh on their children. Surrogacy as a universal crime in Italy: Is it compatible with bioethical principles?父母的“过错”不应压在孩子身上。意大利的代孕是一种普遍的犯罪:这符合生物伦理原则吗?
Clin Ter. 2024 Jul-Aug;175(4):246-251. doi: 10.7417/CT.2024.5071.
4
A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in south American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework.南美洲代孕监管综述:指向国际法律框架的需求
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2182-1.
5
The March 2021 Italian constitutional court ruling on surrogacy: a prelude to common European legislation for the sake of reproductive health?2021 年 3 月意大利宪法法院关于代孕的裁决:为生殖健康制定共同的欧洲立法的前奏?
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022 Feb;27(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1987411. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
6
Assisted reproductive technologies: the problems of legal enforcement.辅助生殖技术:法律执行问题
Wiad Lek. 2018;71(5):1066-1070.
7
An international view of surgically assisted conception and surrogacy tourism.外科辅助受孕与代孕旅游的国际视角。
Med Leg J. 2011;79(Pt 4):135-45. doi: 10.1258/mlj.2011.011029.
8
Barriers for domestic surrogacy and challenges of transnational surrogacy in the context of Australians undertaking surrogacy in India.在澳大利亚人于印度进行代孕的背景下,国内代孕的障碍及跨国代孕的挑战。
J Law Med. 2014 Sep;22(1):136-54.
9
(Mis)regulation--the case of commercial surrogacy.(失)调控——商业代孕的情况
Indian J Med Ethics. 2015 Jan-Mar;12(1):38-41. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.008.
10
International cooperation in criminal proceedings involving assisted reproductive technologies.涉及辅助生殖技术的刑事诉讼中的国际合作。
Wiad Lek. 2019;72(12 cz 2):2531-2535.

引用本文的文献

1
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Health in Assisted Reproductive Care in Spain.西班牙辅助生殖护理中基于人权的健康方法。
J Family Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;19(2):85-96. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v19i2.19296.
2
Mother surrogacy in Albania: a one-way ticket.阿尔巴尼亚的代孕母亲:一张单程票。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Jun 5;6:1570513. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1570513. eCollection 2025.
3
Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Oocyte Donation.辅助生殖技术与卵母细胞捐赠
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Mar;54(3):607-614. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i3.18254.
4
Ethical, medico-legal and financial aspects of the legalization of surrogate maternity in Bulgaria.保加利亚代孕合法化的伦理、医疗法律及财务方面
Afr Health Sci. 2024 Dec;24(4):143-148. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i4.19.
5
20 Years Since the Enactment of Italian Law No. 40/2004 on Medically Assisted Procreation: How It Has Changed and How It Could Change.自意大利第40/2004号关于医学辅助生殖的法律颁布20年以来:其如何改变以及可能如何改变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;22(2):296. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020296.
6
Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.巴西辅助生殖技术应用伦理标准的比较分析:1992年至2023年的决议
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):6-12. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240069.
7
Navigating the gestational surrogacy seas: the legalities and complexities of gestational carrier services.探索代孕的海洋:代孕服务的法律问题与复杂性
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Nov;41(11):3013-3037. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03289-1. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
8
Reflections on appropriately liberalizing ART for groups requiring special attention in China.关于在中国需要特别关注的群体适当放宽抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的思考。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1755-1761. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03184-9. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
9
Surrogacy and Adoption: An Empirical Investigation of Public Moral Attitudes.代孕与收养:公众道德态度的实证研究
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):671-681. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10343-1. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
10
International gestational surrogacy in the United States, 2014-2020.2014-2020 年美国的国际代孕情况。
Fertil Steril. 2024 Apr;121(4):622-630. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-commercial Surrogacy in Thailand: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications in Local and Global Contexts.泰国的非商业代孕:地方与全球背景下的伦理、法律及社会影响
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 May 29;12(2):135-147. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00126-2. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Ethical Implications of Donor Type for Uterus Transplantation: Why We Should Remain Wary of Using Living Donors.供体类型对子宫移植的伦理影响:为什么我们应该对使用活体供体持谨慎态度。
Yale J Biol Med. 2020 Sep 30;93(4):587-592. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Gestational Surrogacy: Current View.妊娠代孕:当前观点
Linacre Q. 2019 Feb;86(1):56-67. doi: 10.1177/0024363919830840. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
4
Legal and ethical issues in cross-border gestational surrogacy.跨境代孕的法律和伦理问题。
Fertil Steril. 2020 May;113(5):916-919. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
Surrogacy relationships: a critical interpretative review.代孕关系:一项批判性解释性综述。
Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):183-191. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
The United Kingdom Revisits Its Surrogacy Law.英国修订代孕法律
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Jan;50(1):6-7. doi: 10.1002/hast.1076.
7
Surrogacy Laws in the United States: What Obstetrician-Gynecologists Need to Know.美国代孕法律:妇产科医生需要了解的内容。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):717-722. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003698.
8
Social freezing of oocytes: a means to take control of your fertility.卵母细胞的社交冷冻:掌控生育力的一种手段。
Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):95-98. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1707332. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
No more only one mom? European Court of Human Rights and Italian jurisprudences' ongoing evolution.不再只有一位母亲?欧洲人权法院与意大利法学的不断演变。
Clin Ter. 2020 Jan-Feb;170(1):e36-e43. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2186.
10
A survey of public attitudes toward uterus transplantation, surrogacy, and adoption in Japan.日本公众对子宫移植、代孕和收养的态度调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 30;14(10):e0223571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223571. eCollection 2019.

代孕与“生育旅游”。从伦理和法律角度看未来会怎样?

Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives?

机构信息

Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic, and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University, 00198 Rome, Italy.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 8;57(1):47. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010047.

DOI:10.3390/medicina57010047
PMID:33429930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7827900/
Abstract

: To explore the ethical and legal complexities arising from the controversial issue of surrogacy, particularly in terms of how they affect fundamental rights of children and parents. Surrogacy is a form of medically-assisted procreation (MAP) in which a woman "lends" her uterus to carry out a pregnancy on behalf of a third party. There are pathological conditions, such as uterine agenesis or hysterectomy outcomes, that may prevent prospective mothers from becoming pregnant or carry a pregnancy to term; such patients may consider finding a surrogate mother. Many issues relating to surrogacy remain unresolved, with significant disagreements and controversy within the scientific community and public opinion. There are several factors called into play and multiple parties and stakeholders whose objectives and interests need to somehow be reconciled. First and foremost, the authors contend, it is essential to prioritize and uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy and heterologous MAP. : To draw a parallel between Italy and the rest of the world, the legislation in force in twelve European countries was analyzed, eleven of which are part of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Portugal) and three non-members of the same (United Kingdom, Ukraine and Russia), as well as that of twelve non-European countries considered exemplary (United States, Canada, Australia, India, China, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and South Africa); in particular, legislative sources and legal databases were drawn upon, in order to draw a comparison with the Italian legislation currently in force and map out the evolution of the Italian case law on the basis of the judgments issued by Italian courts, including the Constitutional and Supreme Courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); search engines such as PubMed and Google Scholar were also used, by entering the keywords "surrogacy" and "surrogate motherhood", to find scientific articles concerning assisted reproduction techniques with a close focus on surrogacy. : SM is a prohibited and sanctioned practice in Italy; on the other hand, it is allowed in other countries of the world, which leads Italian couples, or couples from other countries where it is banned, to often contact foreign centers in order to undertake a MAP pathway which includes surrogacy; in addition, challenges may arise from the legal status of children born through surrogacy abroad: to date, in most countries, there is no specific legislation aimed at regulating their legal registration and parental status. : With reference to the Italian context, despite the scientific and legal evolution on the subject, a legislative intervention aimed at filling the regulatory gaps in terms of heterologous MAP and surrogacy has not yet come to fruition. Considering the possibility of "fertility tourism", i.e., traveling to countries where the practice is legal, as indeed already happens in a relatively significant number of cases, the current legislation, although integrated by the legal interpretation, does not appear to be effective in avoiding the phenomenon of procreative tourism. Moreover, to overcome some contradictions currently present between law 40 and law 194, it would be appropriate to outline an organic and exhaustive framework of rules, which should take into account the multiplicity of interests at stake, in keeping with a fair and sustainable balance when regulating such practices.

摘要

探讨代孕这一备受争议的问题所引发的伦理和法律复杂性,特别是其如何影响儿童和父母的基本权利。代孕是一种医学辅助生殖(MAP)形式,其中女性“借出”她的子宫代表第三方进行妊娠。存在病理性情况,如子宫发育不全或子宫切除术的结果,可能会阻止预期的母亲怀孕或足月妊娠;此类患者可能会考虑寻找代孕母亲。代孕仍存在许多悬而未决的问题,科学界和公众意见存在重大分歧和争议。有几个因素需要考虑,并且需要协调多个利益相关者的目标和利益。首先,作者认为,优先和维护通过代孕和异源 MAP 出生的儿童的权利至关重要。

为了在意大利和世界其他地区之间进行比较,分析了在 12 个欧洲国家(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、希腊、荷兰、比利时、丹麦、立陶宛、捷克共和国和葡萄牙)以及 3 个非欧盟成员国(英国、乌克兰和俄罗斯)现行的立法,以及 12 个被认为是典范的非欧洲国家(美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、印度、中国、泰国、以色列、尼日利亚和南非)的立法;特别参考了立法来源和法律数据库,以便与意大利现行立法进行比较,并根据意大利法院发布的判决(包括宪法法院和最高法院以及欧洲人权法院),对意大利关于代孕的判例法的演变进行了梳理;还使用了 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 等搜索引擎,输入“代孕”和“代孕母亲”等关键词,以找到有关辅助生殖技术的科学文章,重点关注代孕。

在意大利,SM 是一种被禁止和制裁的做法;另一方面,在世界上的其他国家,它是被允许的,这导致意大利夫妇,或其他禁止代孕的国家的夫妇,经常联系外国中心,以便进行包括代孕在内的 MAP 途径;此外,在国外代孕出生的儿童的法律地位也可能带来挑战:迄今为止,在大多数国家,没有专门的立法来规范他们的合法登记和父母身份。

在意大利背景下,尽管在这个问题上有了科学和法律的发展,但针对异源 MAP 和代孕方面的监管空白,立法干预尚未实现。考虑到“生育旅游”的可能性,即前往允许这种做法的国家旅行,事实上已经有相当多的案例发生,目前的立法虽然通过法律解释得到了补充,但似乎并不能有效避免生殖旅游的现象。此外,为了克服目前第 40 号法和第 194 号法之间存在的一些矛盾,有必要制定一个有机和详尽的规则框架,该框架应考虑到所涉利益的多样性,在规范此类做法时保持公平和可持续的平衡。