• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018年大学医学伦理辩论:持续健康监测——技术在医疗保健领域的进展

Varsity medical ethics debate 2018: constant health monitoring - the advance of technology into healthcare.

作者信息

Gilmartin Chris, Arbe-Barnes Edward H, Diamond Michael, Fretwell Sasha, McGivern Euan, Vlazaki Myrto, Zhu Limeng

机构信息

Gonville and Caius College, University of Cambridge, Trinity Street, Cambridge, CB2 1TA, UK.

Magdalen College, University of Oxford, High Street, Oxford, OX1 4AU, UK.

出版信息

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Sep 3;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0065-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13010-018-0065-0
PMID:30176930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6122183/
Abstract

The 2018 Varsity Medical Ethics debate convened upon the motion: "This house believes that the constant monitoring of our health does more harm than good". This annual debate between students from the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge is now in its tenth year. This year's debate was hosted at the Oxford Union on 8th of February 2018, with Oxford winning for the Opposition, and was the catalyst for the collation and expansion of ideas in this paper.New technological devices have the potential to enhance patient autonomy, improve patient safety, simplify the management of chronic diseases, increase connectivity between patients and healthcare professionals and assist individuals to make lifestyle changes to improve their health. However, these are pitted against an encroachment of technology medicalising the individual and home, an exacerbation of health inequalities, a risk to the security of patient data, an alteration of the doctor-patient relationship dynamic and an infringement on individual self-identity. This paper will draw upon and develop these concepts, while contending arguments for and against constant health monitoring. This is not a review of medical devices and health monitoring, but a reflective development and more detailed elaboration of the main points highlighted in the 2018 Varsity Medical Ethics debate.

摘要

2018年大学医学伦理辩论赛围绕“本院认为持续监测我们的健康弊大于利”这一辩题展开。这场牛津大学和剑桥大学学生之间的年度辩论如今已进入第十个年头。今年的辩论于2018年2月8日在牛津大学辩论社举行,牛津大学代表反方获胜,此次辩论成为本文观点整理与拓展的催化剂。新技术设备有潜力增强患者自主权、提高患者安全性、简化慢性病管理、增进患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的联系,并帮助个人改变生活方式以改善健康状况。然而,这些却与技术对个人和家庭的医学化侵蚀、健康不平等加剧、患者数据安全风险、医患关系动态变化以及对个人自我认同的侵犯形成了对立。本文将借鉴并拓展这些概念,同时对支持和反对持续健康监测的论点进行论证。这并非对医疗设备和健康监测的综述,而是对2018年大学医学伦理辩论赛中所强调要点的反思性拓展及更详细阐述。

相似文献

1
Varsity medical ethics debate 2018: constant health monitoring - the advance of technology into healthcare.2018年大学医学伦理辩论:持续健康监测——技术在医疗保健领域的进展
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Sep 3;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0065-0.
2
The 2014 Varsity Medical Ethics Debate: should we allow genetic information to be patented?2014年大学医学伦理辩论:我们应该允许基因信息被专利化吗?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2015 May 20;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13010-015-0028-7.
3
Varsity Medical Ethics Debate 2015: should nootropic drugs be available under prescription on the NHS?2015年大学医学伦理辩论会:益智药是否应通过英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)处方获取?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13010-016-0041-5.
4
Varsity Medical Ethics Debate 2019: is authoritarian government the route to good health outcomes?2019年大学医学伦理辩论会:威权政府是实现良好健康结果的途径吗?
J Med Ethics. 2023 Nov;49(11):791-796. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107861. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
Should the NHS be privatized? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 22 January 2010.国民保健制度应该私有化吗?年度大学医学辩论会——2010年1月22日于伦敦
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2010 May 11;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-7.
6
Should trainee doctors use the developing world to gain clinical experience? The annual Varsity Medical Debate - London, Friday 20th January, 2012.实习医生应该利用发展中世界来积累临床经验吗?2012年1月20日星期五于伦敦举行的年度大学医学辩论会。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013 Feb 21;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-8-1.
7
Leaving patients to their own devices? Smart technology, safety and therapeutic relationships.任由患者自行其是?智能技术、安全与治疗关系。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 6;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0255-8.
8
Advanced Materials for Health Monitoring with Skin-Based Wearable Devices.用于基于皮肤的可穿戴设备的健康监测的先进材料。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Jun;6(11). doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700024. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
'Do-It-Yourself' Healthcare? Quality of Health and Healthcare Through Wearable Sensors.“自助”医疗保健?可穿戴传感器的健康与医疗保健质量。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Jun;24(3):887-904. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9771-4. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
10
A Standards-Based Architecture Proposal for Integrating Patient mHealth Apps to Electronic Health Record Systems.一种将患者移动健康应用程序集成到电子健康记录系统的基于标准的架构提案。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Aug 5;6(3):488-505. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-12-RA-0115. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethical dimension of personal health monitoring in the armed forces: a scoping review.武装部队个人健康监测的伦理维度:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 10;25(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01086-0.
2
Advancing public health: enabling culture-fair and education-independent automated cognitive assessment in low- and middle-income countries.推进公共卫生:在低收入和中等收入国家实现公平文化且独立于教育的自动化认知评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;12:1377482. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377482. eCollection 2024.
3
Personal health monitoring in the armed forces - scouting the ethical dimension : A case study in the Netherlands Armed Forces during the Covid-19 pandemic.武装部队中的个人健康监测——探索伦理维度:在新冠疫情期间荷兰武装部队的案例研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 9;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00899-9.
4
Medical Device Development Process, and Associated Risks and Legislative Aspects-Systematic Review.医疗器械开发过程及相关风险与立法方面——系统评价
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;8:308. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00308. eCollection 2020.
5
The Limits of Empowerment: How to Reframe the Role of mHealth Tools in the Healthcare Ecosystem.赋权的局限性:如何重新构建移动医疗工具在医疗生态系统中的角色。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1159-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00115-1. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.一款避孕移动应用程序的完美使用和典型使用的珍珠指数。
Contraception. 2017 Dec;96(6):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
Patient access to health records: striving for the Swedish ideal.患者获取健康记录:追求瑞典式理想状态。
BMJ. 2017 May 2;357:j2069. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2069.
3
The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Further Findings From the DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.连续血糖监测对 1 型糖尿病成人生活质量指标的影响:DIAMOND 随机临床试验的进一步发现。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jun;40(6):736-741. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0133. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
4
Wearable Technology and Long-term Weight Loss.可穿戴技术与长期体重减轻
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):317-318. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19268.
5
Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): a randomised controlled trial.带或不带激励措施的活动追踪器对增加身体活动的有效性(TRIPPA):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Dec;4(12):983-995. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30284-4. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.可穿戴技术联合生活方式干预对长期体重减轻的影响:IDEA随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1161-1171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12858.
7
Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study.癌症患者对在线获取电子病历的态度和体验:一项定性研究。
Health Informatics J. 2018 Jun;24(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1460458216658778. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
8
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: we can do better.心房颤动的中风预防:我们可以做得更好。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Feb;66(643):62-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683557.
9
Mobile Phones in Research and Treatment: Ethical Guidelines and Future Directions.移动电话在研究和治疗中的应用:伦理准则和未来方向。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Oct 16;3(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4538.
10
The Effects of Web-Based Patient Access to Laboratory Results in British Columbia: A Patient Survey on Comprehension and Anxiety.基于网络的患者获取不列颠哥伦比亚省实验室检查结果的影响:一项关于理解与焦虑的患者调查
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 4;17(8):e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4350.