Altoona Center for Clinical Research, 175 Meadowbrook Lane, PO Box 1018, Duncansville, PA 16635, USA.
Metroplex Clinical Research Center, 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 810, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Dec;48(3):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
This post-hoc, pooled analysis of Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib examined the safety of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) when used as monotherapy versus combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Pooled data from six double-blind, randomized controlled Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID in patients with RA were analyzed for safety and stratified by administration as monotherapy (ORAL Solo: NCT00814307 and ORAL Start: NCT01039688) or in combination with csDMARDs (ORAL Sync: NCT00856544, ORAL Standard: NCT00853385, ORAL Scan: NCT00847613, and ORAL Step: NCT00960440), and by glucocorticoid use at baseline. Safety assessments included incidence rates (IRs) for serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events, and herpes zoster (HZ), and were evaluated throughout the duration of the Phase 3 studies.
In total, 3881 patients were included in the safety analysis (monotherapy studies: n = 1380; combination therapy studies: n = 2501). IRs for selected AEs of interest were generally numerically lower in patients who received tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID as monotherapy than as combination therapy (SAEs: IR [range] 6.21-6.72 versus IR 10.17-13.46; discontinuations due to AEs: IR 5.53-6.18 versus IR 10.80-11.01; serious infections: IR 1.57-1.66 versus IR 3.39-3.56; HZ: IR 1.95-2.93 versus IR 4.37-4.99, respectively), irrespective of tofacitinib dose or glucocorticoid use. There were too few patients and events within the placebo group to fully evaluate effect between combination therapy and monotherapy.
Safety profiles were generally similar between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy; however, selected safety events of interest, including HZ and serious infections, showed lower IRs with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals for tofacitinib all monotherapy versus combination therapy. Tofacitinib monotherapy may, therefore, have fewer safety events compared with combination therapy, and have a favorable risk-benefit profile in patients with active RA who are intolerant to csDMARDs.
这项托法替尼 3 期研究的事后分析,评估了托法替尼 5mg 和 10mg 每日两次(bid)作为单药治疗与传统合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)联合治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的安全性。
对托法替尼 5mg 和 10mg bid 治疗 RA 的 6 项双盲、随机 3 期研究的汇总数据进行安全性分析,并根据单药治疗(ORAL Solo:NCT00814307 和 ORAL Start:NCT01039688)或联合 csDMARDs 治疗(ORAL Sync:NCT00856544、ORAL Standard:NCT00853385、ORAL Scan:NCT00847613 和 ORAL Step:NCT00960440)以及基线时使用糖皮质激素进行分层。安全性评估包括严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率(IRs)、因 AE 而停药、严重感染事件和带状疱疹(HZ),并在 3 期研究的整个过程中进行评估。
共有 3881 例患者纳入安全性分析(单药治疗研究:n=1380;联合治疗研究:n=2501)。与联合治疗相比,接受托法替尼 5mg 和 10mg bid 单药治疗的患者中,某些感兴趣的 AE 的 IRs 通常数值较低(SAEs:IR[范围]6.21-6.72 与 IR 10.17-13.46;因 AE 停药:IR 5.53-6.18 与 IR 10.80-11.01;严重感染:IR 1.57-1.66 与 IR 3.39-3.56;HZ:IR 1.95-2.93 与 IR 4.37-4.99),而不论托法替尼剂量或糖皮质激素使用情况如何。安慰剂组的患者和事件太少,无法充分评估联合治疗与单药治疗之间的疗效差异。
接受单药治疗和联合治疗的患者安全性概况一般相似;然而,包括 HZ 和严重感染在内的某些感兴趣的安全性事件,在托法替尼所有单药治疗与联合治疗的非重叠 95%置信区间内,IRs 较低。因此,与联合治疗相比,托法替尼单药治疗可能具有更少的安全性事件,并且在不能耐受 csDMARDs 的活动性 RA 患者中具有良好的风险效益比。