• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心单医疗组微创 McKeown 食管癌切除术的临床分析。

Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.

出版信息

J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018;19(9):718-725. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1800329.

DOI:10.1631/jzus.B1800329
PMID:30178638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6137420/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

McKeown esophagectomy followed by cervical and abdominal procedures has been commonly used for invasive esophageal carcinoma. This minimally-invasive operative procedure in the lateral prone position has been considered to be the most appropriate method. We describe our experiences in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIME) for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Between March 2016 and February 2018, a total of 82 patients underwent MIME by a single group in our department (a single center). All procedure, operation, oncology, and complication data were reviewed.

RESULTS

All MIME procedures were completed successfully, with no conversions to open surgery. The median operative time was 260 min, and median blood loss was 100 ml. The average number of total harvested lymph nodes was 20.1 in the chest and 13.5 in the abdomen. There were no deaths within 30 postoperative days. Twenty cases (24.4%) developed postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak in 4 (4.9%), single lateral recurrent nerve palsy in 4 (4.9%), bilateral recurrent nerve palsy in 1 (1.2%), pulmonary problems in 3 (3.7%), chyle leak in 1 (1.2%), and other complications in 7 (including pleural effusions in 4, incomplete ileus in 2, and neck incision infection in 1; 8.54%). Average postoperative hospitalization time was 12 d. Blood loss, operation time, morbidity rate, and the number of harvested lymph nodes were analyzed by evaluating learning curves in different periods. Significant differences were found in operative time (P=0.006), postoperative hospitalization days (P=0.015), total harvested lymph nodes (P=0.003), harvested thoracic lymph nodes (P=0.006), and harvested abdominal lymph nodes (P=0.022) among different periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical outcomes following MIME for esophageal cancer are safe and acceptable. The MIME procedure for stages I and II could be performed proficiently and reached an experience plateau after approximately 25 cases.

摘要

目的

麦氏食管癌切除术加颈、腹部手术已广泛应用于侵袭性食管癌。这种侧卧位的微创手术被认为是最合适的方法。我们介绍了我们在食管癌微创麦氏手术(MIME)方面的经验。

方法

2016 年 3 月至 2018 年 2 月,我科(单中心)共对 82 例患者进行了 MIME。回顾所有手术、操作、肿瘤学和并发症数据。

结果

所有 MIME 手术均顺利完成,无中转开放手术。中位手术时间为 260 分钟,中位出血量为 100 毫升。胸部总采集淋巴结数平均为 20.1 个,腹部为 13.5 个。术后 30 天内无死亡。20 例(24.4%)发生术后并发症,包括吻合口漏 4 例(4.9%)、单侧喉返神经麻痹 4 例(4.9%)、双侧喉返神经麻痹 1 例(1.2%)、肺部问题 3 例(3.7%)、乳糜漏 1 例(1.2%)和其他并发症 7 例(包括胸腔积液 4 例、不完全性肠梗阻 2 例、颈部切口感染 1 例;8.54%)。平均术后住院时间为 12 天。通过评估不同时期的学习曲线,分析失血量、手术时间、发病率和采集的淋巴结数量。手术时间(P=0.006)、术后住院天数(P=0.015)、总采集淋巴结数(P=0.003)、采集的胸内淋巴结数(P=0.006)和采集的腹部淋巴结数(P=0.022)在不同时期差异有统计学意义。

结论

MIME 治疗食管癌的手术效果安全、可接受。对于Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期的 MIME 手术,大约完成 25 例后可熟练进行,达到经验平台期。

相似文献

1
Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.单中心单医疗组微创 McKeown 食管癌切除术的临床分析。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018;19(9):718-725. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1800329.
2
Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.微创McKeown食管癌切除术的最新经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12873-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12873.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes and three yearsurvival between total minimally invasive McKeown and dual-incision esophagectomy.全微创 McKeown 与双切口食管切除术的短期结果和 3 年生存率比较。
Thorac Cancer. 2017 Mar;8(2):80-87. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12404. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
4
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管癌切除术中Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown术式的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91.
5
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
6
[Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].人工气胸在半卧位应用于食管癌电视胸腔镜手术
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;34(10):785-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.10.014.
7
[Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[微创McKeown食管癌切除术与Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 May 28;42(5):546-552. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2017.05.011.
8
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.微创食管切除术围手术期并发症的标准化比较:Ivor Lewis 与 McKeown 术式。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
[Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):995-998.
10
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and bacterial spectrum postoperative infections after esophageal tumor surgery in patients aged ≥60 years.60岁及以上食管癌患者术后感染的危险因素及细菌谱
Front Oncol. 2025 May 28;15:1538529. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1538529. eCollection 2025.
2
Unveiling Therapeutic Targets for Esophageal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.揭示食管癌的治疗靶点:全面综述。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Oct 30;30(11):9542-9568. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30110691.
3
Analysis of the learning curve for artificial pneumothorax during an endoscopic McKeown-type resection of oesophageal carcinoma.食管癌内镜McKeown式切除术中人工气胸学习曲线的分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(10):5949-5955. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2813.
4
Learning Curve for Lymph Node Dissection Around the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.麦基翁微创食管切除术中喉返神经周围淋巴结清扫的学习曲线
Front Oncol. 2021 May 20;11:654674. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654674. eCollection 2021.
5
Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影术在预防McKeown微创食管切除术后吻合口漏中的疗效
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 8;10:619822. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.619822. eCollection 2020.
6
Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction.食管切除术和胃管重建后预防吻合口漏的策略。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1069-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01926-8. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
7
Learning curve and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的学习曲线及术后结果
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S777-S785. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.54.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center.侧卧位微创食管切除术:单中心 124 例经验。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jan;9(1):37-43. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12524. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.第八版 AJCC 癌症分期手册:继续从基于人群的方法向更“个体化”的癌症分期方法构建桥梁。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.微创食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的Meta分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Oct 31;9:6751-6762. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S112105. eCollection 2016.
4
Distribution patterns of metastases in recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell esophageal cancer.食管鳞状细胞癌患者喉返神经淋巴结转移灶的分布模式
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12527.
5
Short-term outcomes and one surgeon's learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position.患者俯卧位下行胸腔镜食管切除术的短期疗效及一位外科医生的学习曲线
Surg Today. 2017 Mar;47(3):313-319. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1378-5. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
A novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left laryngeal recurrent nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.一种在食管癌胸腔镜食管切除术中沿左喉返神经进行淋巴结清扫的新方法。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jan;8(1):24-30. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.11.
7
A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown微创食管切除术短期疗效的比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2352-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.12.15.
8
Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.影响微创食管切除术胸段手术难度的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4743-3. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术的比较:结局的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3873-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
Investigation of one-lung ventilation postoperative cognitive dysfunction and regional cerebral oxygen saturation relations.单肺通气术后认知功能障碍与局部脑氧饱和度关系的研究。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Dec;16(12):1042-8. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1500030.