Center of Excellence on Personality Disorder, Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Hospital Slagelse, Region Zealand, Denmark.
Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
J Pers Disord. 2020 Apr;34(2):231-249. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_393. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
This study evaluated the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) proposed for ICD-11 and the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF) developed for Section III and their relationships with external correlates. We used a clinical sample ( = 150; 33% women) of 65 psychiatric outpatients and 85 incarcerated addicts, who self-reported the SASPD and the LPFS-BF. We conducted correlation and regression analyses in order to determine the relative associations of these two measures with relevant external criteria. SASPD predominantly captured externalizing and other-related problems (e.g., potential harm to others), whereas LPFS-BF predominantly captured internalizing and self-related problems (e.g., identity and distress). Generally, LPFS-BF explained more variance of the external criteria relative to SASPD. The findings seem to reflect that the ICD-11 oriented SASPD emphasizes interpersonal and aggressive features, whereas the -oriented LPFS-BF emphasizes self-pathology and distress. More conclusive findings warrant interview-rated personality functioning.
本研究评估了为 ICD-11 提出的标准化人格障碍严重程度评估 (SASPD) 和为第 III 节开发的人格功能水平简短量表 2.0 (LPFS-BF) 及其与外部相关性的关系。我们使用了一个临床样本(= 150;33%为女性),包括 65 名精神病门诊患者和 85 名被监禁的吸毒者,他们自我报告了 SASPD 和 LPFS-BF。我们进行了相关性和回归分析,以确定这两个测量指标与相关外部标准的相对关联。SASPD 主要捕捉到外化和其他相关问题(例如,对他人的潜在伤害),而 LPFS-BF 主要捕捉到内化和自我相关问题(例如,身份和痛苦)。总体而言,LPFS-BF 相对于 SASPD 解释了更多的外部标准的差异。这些发现似乎反映了 ICD-11 导向的 SASPD 强调人际和攻击特征,而 - 导向的 LPFS-BF 强调自我病理和痛苦。更具结论性的发现需要面谈评定的人格功能。