University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science, Turku University Hospital, and City of Turku, Welfare Division, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:25-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Nurses are often responsible for the care of many patients at the same time and have to prioritise their daily nursing care activities. Prioritising the different assessed care needs and managing consequential conflicting expectations, challenges nurses' professional and moral values.
To explore and illustrate the key aspects of the ethical elements of the prioritisation of nursing care and its consequences for nurses.
DESIGN, DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: A scoping review was used to analyse existing empirical research on the topics of priority setting, prioritisation and rationing in nursing care, including the related ethical issues. The selection of material was conducted in three stages: research identification using two data bases, CINAHL and MEDLINE. Out of 2024 citations 25 empirical research articles were analysed using inductive content analysis.
Nurses prioritised patient care or participated in the decision-making at the bedside and at unit, organisational and at societal levels. Bedside priority setting, the main concern of nurses, focused on patients' daily care needs, prioritising work by essential tasks and participating in priority setting for patients' access to care. Unit level priority setting focused on processes and decisions about bed allocation and fairness. Nurses participated in organisational and societal level priority setting through discussion about the priorities. Studies revealed priorities set by nurses include prioritisation between patient groups, patients having specific diseases, the severity of the patient's situation, age, and the perceived good that treatment and care brings to patients. The negative consequences of priority setting activity were nurses' moral distress, missed care, which impacts on both patient outcomes and nursing professional practice and quality of care compromise.
Analysis of the ethical elements, the causes, concerns and consequences of priority setting, need to be studied further to reveal the underlying causes of priority setting for nursing staff. Prioritising has been reported to be difficult for nurses. Therefore there is a need to study the elements and processes involved in order to determine what type of education and support nurses require to assist them in priority setting.
护士经常同时负责照顾许多患者,必须优先安排他们的日常护理活动。优先考虑不同评估的护理需求和管理随之而来的冲突期望,挑战着护士的专业和道德价值观。
探讨和说明护理优先排序的伦理要素的关键方面及其对护士的影响。
设计、数据来源和方法:使用范围综述来分析护理优先排序、优先排序和配给方面的现有实证研究,包括相关的伦理问题。材料的选择分三个阶段进行:使用两个数据库 CINAHL 和 MEDLINE 进行研究识别。在 2024 条引文中,有 25 篇实证研究文章使用归纳内容分析进行了分析。
护士在患者床边和单位、组织和社会层面优先考虑患者护理或参与决策。床边优先排序是护士的主要关注点,侧重于患者的日常护理需求,通过基本任务优先排序和参与患者获得护理的优先级排序来优先考虑工作。单位层面的优先排序侧重于床位分配和公平性的流程和决策。护士通过讨论优先级参与组织和社会层面的优先排序。研究表明,护士设定的优先级包括按患者群体、特定疾病的患者、患者病情的严重程度、年龄以及治疗和护理给患者带来的好处进行优先级排序。优先排序活动的负面后果包括护士的道德困境、护理缺失,这对患者结果和护理专业实践以及护理质量都有影响。
需要进一步研究优先排序的伦理要素、原因、关注点和后果,以揭示护理人员优先排序的根本原因。据报道,护士优先排序很困难。因此,需要研究所涉及的要素和过程,以确定护士需要何种类型的教育和支持来协助他们进行优先排序。