Jeffs Lianne, Limoges Jacqueline, DasGupta Tracey, Di Prospero Lisa, Harris Alexandra, Merkley Jane, Rosen Benjamin, Akande Adebisi, Bruno Frances, Black Agnes, McGillis Hall Linda
Science of Care Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0327464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327464. eCollection 2025.
Globally, healthcare systems continue to recover and manage system demands, including our sustained HHR pressures exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Health system leaders need to understand how healthcare was adapted during the pandemic, what contributed to these changes, and the impact of these changes to inform future efforts. The overarching research questions included: What changes to models of care were made during COVID-19 and post-recovery? What factors contributed to changes in models of care? What was the impact of these changes? An exploratory interpretative descriptive qualitative study was undertaken to describe what HHR strategies and changes to models of care delivery were employed during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic recovery. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted where an investigation team of research staff identified, coded, and categorized prominent themes that emerged in the interview data. A total of 118 participants from a variety of healthcare professionals and leadership positions across five healthcare organizations in the greater Toronto area in Ontario and 1 setting from British Columbia were interviewed. The following three themes were identified during the inductive analysis: 1) prioritizing care based on system capacity, patient volume and complexity; 2) adapting care by innovating, clustering, and taking shortcuts; and 3) being impacted by prioritized and adapted care. Adapting and prioritizing care resulted in missed or delayed care and moral distress in healthcare professionals. Study findings call for leaders to develop and deploy anticipatory adaptive strategies at the organizational level to mitigate pressures related to system capacity and patient volume and complexity. In turn, anticipatory adaptive strategies can guide efforts by healthcare professionals to manage and adapt their clinical tasks, workload, and demands, ensuring patient safety and workforce resilience at the clinical microsystem level.
在全球范围内,医疗保健系统仍在继续恢复并应对系统需求,包括因新冠疫情加剧的持续人力资源压力。卫生系统领导者需要了解在疫情期间医疗保健是如何调整的,促成这些变化的因素是什么,以及这些变化的影响,以便为未来的工作提供参考。总体研究问题包括:在新冠疫情期间及恢复后,护理模式发生了哪些变化?促成护理模式变化的因素有哪些?这些变化产生了什么影响?我们开展了一项探索性解释性描述性定性研究,以描述在新冠疫情期间及疫情后恢复阶段采用了哪些人力资源战略以及护理提供模式的变化。我们进行了归纳主题分析,研究人员组成的调查团队对访谈数据中出现的突出主题进行了识别、编码和分类。来自安大略省大多伦多地区五个医疗保健组织以及不列颠哥伦比亚省一个机构的118名来自不同医疗专业和领导职位的参与者接受了访谈。在归纳分析过程中确定了以下三个主题:1)根据系统能力、患者数量和复杂性对护理进行优先排序;2)通过创新、整合和走捷径来调整护理;3)受到优先排序和调整后护理的影响。调整和优先排序护理导致医疗保健专业人员出现护理缺失或延迟以及道德困扰。研究结果呼吁领导者在组织层面制定和部署前瞻性适应性战略,以减轻与系统能力、患者数量和复杂性相关的压力。反过来,前瞻性适应性战略可以指导医疗保健专业人员管理和调整他们的临床任务、工作量和需求,确保临床微观系统层面的患者安全和劳动力韧性。