Suppr超能文献

《OptimaMed 干预措施减少重症痴呆养老院居民的不适当药物使用:一项准实验可行性试点研究结果》。

The OptimaMed intervention to reduce inappropriate medications in nursing home residents with severe dementia: results from a quasi-experimental feasibility pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Division of Geriatric Medicine, McGill University, 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Z1, Canada.

Donald Berman Maimonides Centre for Research in Aging, 5795 Caldwell Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H4W 1W3, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0895-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication regimens in nursing home (NH) residents with severe dementia should be frequently reviewed to avoid inappropriate medication, overtreatment and adverse drug events, within a comfort care approach. This study aimed at testing the feasibility of an interdisciplinary knowledge exchange (KE) intervention using a medication review guidance tool categorizing medications as either "generally", "sometimes" or "exceptionally" appropriate for NH residents with severe dementia.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental feasibility pilot study with 44 participating residents aged 65 years or over with severe dementia was carried out in three NH in Quebec City, Canada. The intervention comprised an information leaflet for residents' families, a 90-min KE session for NH general practitioners (GP), pharmacists and nurses focusing on the medication review guidance tool, a medication review by the pharmacists for participating residents with ensuing team discussion on medication changes, and a post-intervention KE session to obtain feedback from team staff. Medication regimens and levels of pain and of agitation of the participants were evaluated at baseline and at 4 months post-intervention. A questionnaire for team staff explored perceived barriers and facilitators. Statistical differences in measures comparing pre and post-intervention were assessed using paired t-tests and Cochran's-Q tests.

RESULTS

The KE sessions reached 34 NH team staff (5 GP, 4 pharmacists, 6 heads of care unit and 19 staff nurses). Forty-four residents participated in the study and were followed for a mean of 104 days. The total number of regular medications was 372 pre and 327 post-intervention. The mean number of regular medications per resident was 7.86 pre and 6.81 post-intervention. The odds ratios estimating the risks of using any regular medication or a "sometimes appropriate" medication post-intervention were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.92) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A simple KE intervention using a medication review guidance tool categorizing medications as being either "generally", "sometimes" or "exceptionally" appropriate in severe dementia was well received and accompanied by an overall reduction in medication use by NH residents with severe dementia. Levels of agitation were unaffected and there was no clinically significant changes in levels of pain. Staff feedback provided opportunities to improve the intervention.

摘要

背景

在以舒适护理为基础的前提下,应当定期审查护理院(NH)中患有严重痴呆症的患者的药物治疗方案,以避免用药不当、过度治疗和药物不良反应。本研究旨在测试一种使用药物审查指导工具的跨学科知识交流(KE)干预措施的可行性,该工具将药物分为“通常”、“有时”或“特别”适用于患有严重痴呆症的 NH 居民。

方法

在加拿大魁北克市的三家 NH 中进行了一项具有 44 名参与者的准实验可行性试点研究,参与者均为 65 岁或以上患有严重痴呆症的老年人。该干预措施包括为居民家属提供的信息传单、针对 NH 全科医生(GP)、药剂师和护士的 90 分钟 KE 会议,重点介绍药物审查指导工具,药剂师对参与居民进行药物审查,随后团队讨论药物变更,以及干预后获取团队人员反馈的 KE 会议。在干预前和干预后 4 个月评估参与者的药物治疗方案以及疼痛和激越水平。团队人员调查问卷用于探索感知到的障碍和促进因素。使用配对 t 检验和 Cochran's-Q 检验评估比较干预前后措施的统计差异。

结果

KE 会议共吸引了 34 名 NH 团队人员(5 名 GP、4 名药剂师、6 名护理主任和 19 名护士)参加。44 名居民参加了该研究,平均随访 104 天。治疗方案中的常规药物总数为干预前 372 种,干预后 327 种。每位居民的平均常规药物数量为干预前 7.86 种,干预后 6.81 种。估计使用任何常规药物或“有时适当”药物的风险的比值比(OR)分别为 0.81(95%CI:0.71-0.92)和 0.83(95%CI:0.74-0.94)。

结论

一种简单的 KE 干预措施,使用药物审查指导工具将药物分为“通常”、“有时”或“特别”适用于严重痴呆症,该措施受到了欢迎,并伴有 NH 中患有严重痴呆症的居民用药总体减少。激越水平没有受到影响,疼痛水平也没有临床意义上的变化。员工反馈提供了改进干预措施的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fc/6123948/d83cf672b4a8/12877_2018_895_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验