• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症或轻度认知障碍老年人的药物优化与减药干预结果:一项系统评价

Medicine Optimisation and Deprescribing Intervention Outcomes for Older People with Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Andrews Nicola, Brooks Cindy, Board Michele, Fraser Simon, Latter Sue, Aplin Kirsty, McCausland Beth, Radcliffe Eloise, Amin Jay, Lim Rosemary, van Leeuwen Ellen, Ibrahim Kinda

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2025 Apr;42(4):275-294. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01189-2. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s40266-025-01189-2
PMID:40067601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12003602/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is common amongst older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), increasing the risk of medication-related harm. Medicine optimisation and deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy is considered feasible, safe and can lead to improved health. However, for those living with dementia or MCI, this can be challenging. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence on the outcomes of medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions for older people with dementia or MCI.

METHODS

Literature was searched using CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception to January 2024. Papers reporting data specific to people with dementia or MCI from medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventional research studies of any design and in any setting were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted owing to heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

A total of 32 papers reporting on 28 studies were included, with samples ranging from 29 to 17,933 patients and a mean patient age ranging from 74 to 88 years. Of the studies, 60% were undertaken in long-term care settings. Involvement of patients and/or carers in interventions was limited. Papers were grouped as either incorporating a medication review component (n = 13), education component (n = 5) or both (n = 14). Studies primarily focussed on medication-related outcomes, generally showing a positive effect on decreasing the number and improving appropriateness of medications. Fewer papers reported clinical outcomes (behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, falls, quality of life and cognition) with mixed findings. A reduction or no change in mortality or hospital attendance demonstrated safety of the interventions in the few papers reporting these outcomes. The quality of the evidence was mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions generally reduced the number and increased the appropriateness of medications, and although less frequently reported, these interventions seemed to be safe and showed an absence of worsening of clinical outcomes. This review highlights a need for further research, particularly in people with dementia or MCI living at home, with more focus on clinical outcomes and a greater involvement of patients and informal carers.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The protocol was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [Ref: CRD42023398139].

摘要

背景

多重用药在患有痴呆症或轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人中很常见,增加了药物相关伤害的风险。优化用药和减药以减少多重用药被认为是可行、安全的,并且可以改善健康状况。然而,对于患有痴呆症或MCI的人来说,这可能具有挑战性。本系统评价旨在总结关于痴呆症或MCI老年人优化用药和减药干预结果的证据。

方法

从数据库建立至2024年1月,使用CINAHL、Embase、Medline、PsychINFO、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索。纳入报告任何设计和任何环境下优化用药和减药干预研究中痴呆症或MCI患者特定数据的论文。由于研究设计和结果的异质性,进行了叙述性综合分析。使用混合方法评估工具评估质量。

结果

共纳入报告28项研究的32篇论文,样本量从29例到17933例患者不等,患者平均年龄从

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fad/12003602/71cbeaf7e4e2/40266_2025_1189_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fad/12003602/71cbeaf7e4e2/40266_2025_1189_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fad/12003602/71cbeaf7e4e2/40266_2025_1189_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Medicine Optimisation and Deprescribing Intervention Outcomes for Older People with Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.痴呆症或轻度认知障碍老年人的药物优化与减药干预结果:一项系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2025 Apr;42(4):275-294. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01189-2. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
A systematic review of the evidence for deprescribing interventions among older people living with frailty.衰弱老年人药物重整干预措施的证据的系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02208-8.
3
Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.针对多病共存和多种药物治疗的老年人减药:TAILOR 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(32):1-148. doi: 10.3310/AAFO2475.
4
The OPTIMIZE patient- and family-centered, primary care-based deprescribing intervention for older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.OPTIMIZE 患者和家属为中心、基于初级保健的老年痴呆或轻度认知障碍和多种慢性病患者药物减量干预方案:一项实用型群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 18;21(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04482-0.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Interventions for improving medication-taking ability and adherence in older adults prescribed multiple medications.针对开具多种药物处方的老年人提高用药能力和依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 8;5(5):CD012419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012419.pub2.
7
Deprescribing interventions and their impact on medication adherence in community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy: a systematic review.减少用药干预及其对社区居住的多药治疗老年患者药物依从性的影响:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1031-4.
8
A systematic review of randomised-controlled trials on deprescribing outcomes in older adults with polypharmacy.一项关于减少老年多病患者用药的随机对照试验结果的系统评价。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun 30;31(4):349-368. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad025.
9
The evidence and impact of deprescribing on sarcopenia parameters: a systematic review.减药对肌肉减少症参数的证据及影响:一项系统综述
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05819-7.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of chronic exercise with markers of cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性运动与心脏代谢健康标志物的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2025 Feb;104:102645. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102645. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Clinical Validation of TIME Criteria to Detect Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults: Methodological Report from the TIME International Study Group.用于检测老年人潜在不适当用药的TIME标准的跨文化适应与临床验证:TIME国际研究小组的方法学报告
Drugs Aging. 2025 Jan;42(1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01164-3. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
3
The Impact of Deprescribing Interventions on the Drug Burden Index and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
《药物重整干预对药物负担指数和其他结局的影响:系统评价》。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Jul;25(7):105021. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105021. Epub 2024 May 17.
4
Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review.测量减药试验中的生活质量:范围综述。
Drugs Aging. 2024 May;41(5):379-397. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Efficacy of deprescribing on health outcomes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物减量对健康结局的疗效:系统评价的伞状评价,对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Mar;95:102237. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102237. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
6
Supporting shared decision-making in medicines use with people living with dementia and their carers.支持痴呆症患者及其护理人员在药物使用方面共同做出决策。
Nurs Older People. 2024 Jan 24. doi: 10.7748/nop.2024.e1458.
7
Evaluating the Safety of an Educational Deprescribing Intervention: Lessons from the Optimize Trial.评估教育性药物减量干预的安全性:来自 Optimize 试验的经验教训。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Jan;41(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01080-y. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
Evaluation of the Effect of a Safe Medication Strategy on Potentially Inappropriate Medications, Polypharmacy and Anticholinergic Burden for People with Dementia: An Intervention Study.评估安全用药策略对痴呆症患者潜在不适当用药、多重用药和抗胆碱能负担的影响:一项干预性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 19;11(20):2771. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202771.
9
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.多学科药物审查和减少老年人用药干预措施在初级保健中为何能良好运行?一项实际审查和综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8.
10
The OptimaMed intervention to reduce medication burden in nursing home residents with severe dementia: results from a pragmatic, controlled study.《OptimaMed 干预以降低重症痴呆养老院居民的药物负担:一项实用对照研究的结果》。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04222-4.