Use of Iterative Cycles in Quality Improvement Projects in Imaging: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE

Studies suggest that quality improvement (QI) projects in health care lack scientific rigor, but the actual frequency of use of proven scientific QI methodology is unknown. The purposes of this study are to (1) conduct a systematic review of QI projects in radiology journals on the frequency of use of iterative cycles, a marker of proven QI methodology, and (2) assess association of the use of iterative cycles with characteristics of these projects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched English-language radiology journals on MEDLINE between 2008 and 2015 for published QI studies. Three reviewers appraised studies and extracted data. Use of iterative cycles was identified, and results were summarized qualitatively. χ Analysis evaluated associations of iterative cycles with other data elements.

RESULTS

Of 3,134 potentially eligible citations, 44 studies met inclusion criteria. Only 46% of these used iterative cycles to refine intervention. Use of iterative cycles were associated with projects designed to improve process, QI expert support, reporting of unintended effect of intervention, and explicitly stated use of iterative cycles. General lack of scientific rigor was represented by failure to report baseline data (9%), describe unintended effects (66%), and discuss limitations (36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review found fewer than half of the QI projects in radiology journals used iterative cycles to refine intervention, a scientific strategy central to many proven improvement methodologies. Use of iterative approach was associated with projects designed to improve processes, QI expert support, report of unintended effect, and explicitly stated use of iterative cycles.