Zhang Zhennan, Yu Tong, Xie Limin, Li Yubin, Ke Xun, Liu Yang, Huang Songmin, Deng Hao, Bai Yang
Department of Orthopedics, Guanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Sep;16(3):2682-2688. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6488. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
Type classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is important for collapse prediction in ONFH, which depends on a complexity of factors. At present, most typing is based on single factors, including the location or size of the necrosis, or the bone repair capacity after ONFH, and is therefore limited. The present study proposes an 'ABC' method for ONFH typing based on biomechanics and the stress distribution characteristics of the femoral head's bone trabeculae. In total, 132 ONFH patients (223 hips) were enrolled at Guanganmen Hospital (Beijing, China). Each of the hip joints included was subjected to computerized tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The images with the maximum necrotic area in the coronal femoral head were selected, and the femoral head's maximum transverse diameter was divided into three pillars (A, B and C, from the outside to the inside) according to a 3:4:3 diameter ratio. ONFH was typed according to the number of pillars involved in the necrosis. Differences in the collapse rate of different ONFH types, and the correlation between the theoretical collapse risk and the observed collapse rate was analysed. The ONFH types significantly differed in their collapse rate (χ=76.93, P<0.001) in the following order: A-C (88.6%)>AB (74.1%)>BC (52.4%)>A (50%)>B (9.5%)>C (0%). The collapse risk was significantly correlated with the collapse rate (correlation coefficient R=1). The types A-C and AB had high collapse rates/risks, whereas types B and C had a satisfactory prognosis. The ABC typing proposed in the present study is thus suitable for collapse risk prediction in ONFH. Type classification using this method may provide a valuable reference for selecting regimens for ONFH treatment.
股骨头坏死(ONFH)的类型分类对于ONFH的塌陷预测很重要,而塌陷预测取决于多种复杂因素。目前,大多数分型基于单一因素,包括坏死的位置或大小,或ONFH后的骨修复能力,因此存在局限性。本研究基于生物力学和股骨头骨小梁的应力分布特征,提出了一种ONFH分型的“ABC”方法。总共132例ONFH患者(223髋)在北京广安门医院入组。纳入的每个髋关节均接受了计算机断层扫描和/或磁共振成像。选择股骨头冠状面上坏死面积最大的图像,并根据3:4:3的直径比例将股骨头的最大横径分为三个柱体(A、B和C,从外到内)。根据坏死累及的柱体数量对ONFH进行分型。分析了不同ONFH类型的塌陷率差异,以及理论塌陷风险与观察到的塌陷率之间的相关性。不同ONFH类型的塌陷率差异显著(χ=76.93,P<0.001),顺序如下:A-C(88.6%)>AB(74.1%)>BC(52.4%)>A(50%)>B(9.5%)>C(0%)。塌陷风险与塌陷率显著相关(相关系数R=1)。A-C型和AB型的塌陷率/风险较高,而B型和C型的预后良好。因此,本研究提出的ABC分型适用于ONFH的塌陷风险预测。使用该方法进行类型分类可为ONFH治疗方案的选择提供有价值的参考。