Lim Seon Woo, So Eunsun, Yun Hye Joo, Karm Myong-Hwan, Chang Juhea, Lee Hanbin, Kim Hyun Jeong, Seo Kwang-Suk
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University, School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;18(4):245-254. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.4.245. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
When performing dental treatment under general anesthesia in adult patients who have difficulty cooperating due to intellectual disabilities, anesthesia induction may be difficult as well. In particular, patients who refuse to come into the dental office or sit in the dental chair may have to be forced to do so. However, for adult patients with a large physique, physical restraint may be difficult, while oral sedatives as premedication may be helpful. Here, a retrospective analysis was performed to investigate the effect of oral sedatives.
A hospital-based medical information database was searched for patients who were prescribed oral midazolam or triazolam between January 2009 and December 2017. Pre-anesthesia evaluation, anesthesia, and anesthesia recovery records of all patients were analyzed, and information on disability type, reason for prescribing oral sedatives, prescribed medication and dose, cooperation level during anesthesia induction, anesthesia duration, length of recovery room stay, and complications was retrieved.
A total of 97 patients were identified, of whom 50 and 47 received midazolam and triazolam, respectively. The major types of disability were intellectual disabilities, autism, Down syndrome, blindness, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy. Analyses of changes in cooperation levels after drug administration showed that anesthesia induction without physical restraint was possible in 56.0% of patients in the midazolam group and in 46.8% of patients in the triazolam group (P = 0.312).
With administration of oral midazolam or triazolam, general anesthesia induction without any physical restraint was possible in approximately 50% of patients, with no difference between the drugs.
在因智力残疾而难以配合的成年患者中进行全身麻醉下的牙科治疗时,麻醉诱导也可能存在困难。特别是那些拒绝进入牙科诊所或坐在牙科椅上的患者可能不得不被强制这样做。然而,对于体型较大的成年患者,身体约束可能很困难,而口服镇静剂作为术前用药可能会有所帮助。在此,进行了一项回顾性分析以研究口服镇静剂的效果。
在一个基于医院的医学信息数据库中搜索2009年1月至2017年12月期间开具口服咪达唑仑或三唑仑处方的患者。分析所有患者的麻醉前评估、麻醉及麻醉恢复记录,并获取有关残疾类型、开具口服镇静剂的原因、所开药物及剂量、麻醉诱导期间的配合程度、麻醉持续时间、恢复室停留时间及并发症的信息。
共识别出97例患者,其中50例和47例分别接受了咪达唑仑和三唑仑治疗。主要残疾类型为智力残疾、自闭症、唐氏综合征、失明、脑瘫和癫痫。药物给药后配合程度变化分析显示,咪达唑仑组56.0%的患者和三唑仑组46.8%的患者无需身体约束即可进行麻醉诱导(P = 0.312)。
给予口服咪达唑仑或三唑仑后,约50%的患者无需任何身体约束即可进行全身麻醉诱导,两种药物之间无差异。