• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多剂量舌下三唑仑在健康志愿者中的药代动力学和临床效应的扩展研究。

Expanded studies of the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Dental Fears Research Clinic, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;29(5):426-31. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181b5f45e.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181b5f45e
PMID:19745641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2881333/
Abstract

Previous work described the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam (Halcion; Pharmacia & Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, Mich). This laboratory study evaluated the hypothesis that incremental dosing of triazolam produces dose-dependent central nervous system depression that is profound and long lasting. Forty-nine healthy adults between the ages of 21 and 39 years, not receiving dental treatment, were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 12) or 1 of 3 triazolam groups (0.25-mg single dose, n = 12; 0.5 mg divided between 2 equal doses for 60 minutes, n = 12; or 0.75 mg divided among 3 doses for 90 minutes, n = 13). Plasma triazolam concentrations were determined. Bispectral index (BIS) and the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale were used to assess sedation. Plasma triazolam concentrations increased with time in all subjects, with Tmax and Cmax both increasing dose dependently. Compared with placebo, all dosing paradigms produced dose-dependent BIS suppression and sedation. The single dose of 0.25 mg reached its peak BIS suppression at 90 (81 +/- 7) minutes and sedation at 120 (3.6 +/- 0.5) minutes and returned to baseline before 360 minutes. In contrast, incremental dosing of 0.5 and 0.75 mg produced profound and long-lasting BIS suppression and sedation that did not plateau until either 180 or 210 minutes as measured by the BIS index (67 +/- 14 and 60 +/- 16 at 0.5 and 0.75 mg, respectively) and 150 minutes as measured by the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (3.2 +/- 1.0 and 2.7 +/- 0.4 at 0.5 and 0.75 mg, respectively). These data more fully characterize the effects of incremental dosing with sublingual triazolam and provide additional insight for discharge safety recommendations.

摘要

先前的工作描述了多剂量舌下三唑仑(Halcion;Pharmacia & Upjohn Co,Kalamazoo,密歇根州)的药代动力学和临床效果。这项实验室研究评估了这样一个假设,即三唑仑的递增剂量会产生剂量依赖性的中枢神经系统抑制作用,这种作用既深刻又持久。49 名年龄在 21 至 39 岁之间、未接受牙科治疗的健康成年人被随机分配至安慰剂组(n = 12)或 3 个三唑仑组之一(0.25 毫克单剂量,n = 12;0.5 毫克在 60 分钟内分为 2 等份剂量,n = 12;或 0.75 毫克分为 3 等份剂量,n = 13)。测定血浆三唑仑浓度。双频谱指数(BIS)和观察者评估警觉/镇静量表用于评估镇静。所有受试者的血浆三唑仑浓度随时间增加,Tmax 和 Cmax 均呈剂量依赖性增加。与安慰剂相比,所有给药方案均产生剂量依赖性 BIS 抑制和镇静作用。0.25 毫克的单剂量在 90 分钟(81 +/- 7)时达到其 BIS 抑制的峰值,在 120 分钟(3.6 +/- 0.5)时达到镇静的峰值,并在 360 分钟前恢复至基线。相比之下,递增剂量的 0.5 和 0.75 毫克产生了深刻而持久的 BIS 抑制和镇静作用,直到 BIS 指数(分别为 0.5 和 0.75 毫克时为 67 +/- 14 和 60 +/- 16)达到 180 分钟或 210 分钟,或观察者评估警觉/镇静量表(分别为 0.5 和 0.75 毫克时为 3.2 +/- 1.0 和 2.7 +/- 0.4)达到 150 分钟时才达到平台。这些数据更全面地描述了舌下三唑仑递增剂量的作用,并为出院安全建议提供了更多的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8061/2881333/53e13a5438e4/nihms-198707-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8061/2881333/d7dfea4c3bfc/nihms-198707-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8061/2881333/53e13a5438e4/nihms-198707-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8061/2881333/d7dfea4c3bfc/nihms-198707-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8061/2881333/53e13a5438e4/nihms-198707-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Expanded studies of the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam in healthy volunteers.多剂量舌下三唑仑在健康志愿者中的药代动力学和临床效应的扩展研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;29(5):426-31. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181b5f45e.
2
Pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者多次舌下含服三唑仑的药代动力学及临床效应
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):4-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000186742.07148.da.
3
Flumazenil reversal of sublingual triazolam: a randomized controlled clinical trial.氟马西尼对舌下含服三唑仑的逆转作用:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 May;140(5):559-66. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0226.
4
Comparison of sublingually and orally administered triazolam for premedication before oral surgery.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Aug;84(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90055-x.
5
Pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of sublingual triazolam in pediatric dental patients.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Jun;21(3):268-72. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200106000-00004.
6
Effect of sublingual triazolam on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.舌下含服三唑仑对不可逆性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞成功率的影响。
J Endod. 2008 Oct;34(10):1167-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.013. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
7
Maximum cumulative doses of sedation medications for in-office use.用于门诊的镇静药物最大累积剂量。
Gen Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;55(2):143-8; quiz 149, 167-8.
8
Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.使用双谱分析评估接受静脉清醒镇静患者的恢复情况。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.23366.
9
Triazolam use in the dental setting: a report of 270 uses over 15 years.三唑仑在牙科治疗中的应用:15年270例使用报告。
Gen Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;52(6):496-501.
10
Premedication with sublingual triazolam compared with oral diazepam.舌下含服三唑仑与口服地西泮的术前用药比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Sep;40(9):829-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03009253.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the effect of oral midazolam and triazolam premedication before general anesthesia in patients with disabilities with difficulty in cooperation.分析咪达唑仑和三唑仑口服术前用药对合作困难的残疾患者全身麻醉前的效果。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;18(4):245-254. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.4.245. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
2
Pharmacokinetic considerations for moderate and deep sedation.中度和深度镇静的药代动力学考量
Anesth Prog. 2011 Fall;58(4):166-72; quiz 173. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-58.4.166.

本文引用的文献

1
Flumazenil reversal of sublingual triazolam: a randomized controlled clinical trial.氟马西尼对舌下含服三唑仑的逆转作用:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 May;140(5):559-66. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0226.
2
Pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者多次舌下含服三唑仑的药代动力学及临床效应
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):4-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000186742.07148.da.
3
Pharmacologic management of dental anxiety: conscious versus unconscious sedation.
牙科焦虑症的药物治疗:清醒镇静与无意识镇静
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000200150.79850.8d.
4
Pharmocokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single-dose triazolam: electroencephalography compared with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test.单剂量三唑仑的药代动力学和药效学:脑电图与数字符号替换测验的比较
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Sep;60(3):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02409.x.
5
Inhalational and enteral conscious sedation for the adult dental patient.成人牙科患者的吸入性和肠内清醒镇静。
Dent Clin North Am. 2002 Oct;46(4):781-802. doi: 10.1016/s0011-8532(02)00029-0.
6
Considerations for the use of oral sedation in the institutionalized geriatric patient during dental interventions: a review of the literature.
Spec Care Dentist. 1999 Mar-Apr;19(2):56-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1999.tb01369.x.
7
Bispectral index monitoring.脑电双频指数监测
Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;19(4):947-66, xi. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(01)80018-3.
8
Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane, midazolam, and propofol.七氟醚、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚镇静期间的脑电双频指数监测。
Anesthesiology. 2001 Nov;95(5):1151-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00019.
9
Comparative kinetics and response to the benzodiazepine agonists triazolam and zolpidem: evaluation of sex-dependent differences.苯二氮䓬类激动剂三唑仑和唑吡坦的比较动力学及反应:性别依赖性差异评估
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000 May;293(2):435-43.
10
The use of bispectral analysis in patients undergoing intravenous sedation for third molar extractions.双谱分析在接受静脉镇静进行第三磨牙拔除术患者中的应用。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Apr;58(4):364-8; discussion 369. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90911-x.