Xie Wenting, Ross Erin E, Kramer Mark A, Eden Uri T, Chu Catherine J
Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics Boston University Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
Epilepsia Open. 2018 Jul 22;3(3):409-417. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12248. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) is a common, self-limited epilepsy syndrome affecting school-age children. Classic interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) confirm diagnosis, and BECTS is presumed to be pharmacoresponsive. As seizure risk decreases in time with this disease, we hypothesize that the impact of IEDs and anticonvulsive drug (ACD) treatment on the risk of subsequent seizure will differ based on disease duration.
We calculate subsequent seizure risk following diagnosis in a large retrospective cohort of children with BECTS (n = 130), evaluating the impact of IEDs and ACD treatment in the first, second, third, and fourth years of disease. We use a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and logistic regression models. Patients were censored if they were lost to follow-up or if they changed group status.
Two-thirds of children had a subsequent seizure within 2 years of diagnosis. The majority of children had a subsequent seizure within 3 years despite treatment. The presence of IEDs on electroencephalography (EEG) did not impact subsequent seizure risk early in the disease. By the fourth year of disease, all children without IEDs remained seizure free, whereas one-third of children with IEDs at this stage had a subsequent seizure. Conversely, ACD treatment corresponded with lower risk of seizure early in the disease but did not impact seizure risk in later years.
In this cohort, the majority of children with BECTS had a subsequent seizure despite treatment. In addition, ACD treatment and IEDs predicted seizure risk at specific points of disease duration. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these exploratory findings.
中央颞区棘波的良性癫痫(BECTS)是一种常见的、自限性癫痫综合征,影响学龄儿童。典型的发作间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)可确诊,且BECTS被认为对药物治疗有反应。随着这种疾病发作风险随时间降低,我们假设IEDs和抗惊厥药物(ACD)治疗对后续发作风险的影响会因疾病持续时间而异。
我们计算了一大组BECTS儿童(n = 130)诊断后的后续发作风险,评估了疾病第一年、第二年、第三年和第四年IEDs和ACD治疗的影响。我们使用了Kaplan-Meier生存分析和逻辑回归模型。如果患者失访或改变组状态,则对其进行截尾。
三分之二的儿童在诊断后2年内出现了后续发作。尽管接受了治疗,但大多数儿童在3年内出现了后续发作。脑电图(EEG)上IEDs的存在在疾病早期并未影响后续发作风险。到疾病第四年,所有无IEDs的儿童均无发作,而此时有IEDs的儿童中有三分之一出现了后续发作。相反,ACD治疗在疾病早期与较低的发作风险相关,但在后期并未影响发作风险。
在这个队列中,大多数BECTS儿童尽管接受了治疗仍出现了后续发作。此外,ACD治疗和IEDs在疾病持续时间的特定时间点预测了发作风险。需要未来的前瞻性研究来验证这些探索性发现。