The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Nov;9(11):1406-1412. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12850. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
Since the conception of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, tubeless strategies have become popular. Herein, we introduce a previously unreported alternative air-extraction strategy for patients who have undergone thoracoscopic wedge resection and explore its feasibility and safety.
Between January 2015 and June 2017, 264 consecutive patients underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection with different drainage strategies. Patients were divided according to the postoperative drainage strategies used: routine chest tube drainage (RT group), complete omission of chest tube drainage (OT group), and prophylactic air-extraction catheter insertion procedure (PC group). Using the propensity score matching method, clinical parameters and objective operative qualities were compared among the three groups.
Optimal 1:1 matching was used to form pairs of RT (n =36) and PC (n =36) groups and balance baseline characteristics among the three groups. The incidence rates of pneumothorax were 5.6% (2/36), 9.8% (5/51), and 19.4% (7/36) in the RT, OT, and PC groups, respectively (P = 0.07). Chest tube reinsertion incidence for postoperative pneumothorax was 19.4% (1/7) in the PC group and 60% (3/5) in the OT group. Other postoperative complications were comparable among these groups.
The prophylactic air-extraction strategy may be an alternative procedure for selected patients. Remedial air extraction may reduce the occurrence of chest tube reinsertion for pneumothorax patients, but further investigation is required.
自手术后加速康复方案问世以来,无管化策略变得越来越流行。在此,我们介绍一种以前未报道过的用于接受电视胸腔镜楔形切除术患者的替代抽气策略,并探讨其可行性和安全性。
2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月,连续 264 例患者接受了不同引流策略的电视胸腔镜楔形切除术。根据术后引流策略将患者分为常规胸腔引流管组(RT 组)、完全不置管引流组(OT 组)和预防性抽气导管插入组(PC 组)。使用倾向评分匹配法比较三组的临床参数和客观手术质量。
使用最优 1:1 匹配方法,将 RT 组(n=36)和 PC 组(n=36)进行配对,并平衡三组间的基线特征。RT 组、OT 组和 PC 组气胸发生率分别为 5.6%(2/36)、9.8%(5/51)和 19.4%(7/36)(P=0.07)。PC 组术后气胸患者中,胸腔管再插入的发生率为 19.4%(1/7),OT 组为 60%(3/5)。这些组间的其他术后并发症相似。
预防性抽气策略可能是一种可供选择的方法,适用于特定患者。补救性抽气可能会减少气胸患者需要再次插入胸腔引流管的发生率,但仍需要进一步研究。