Korn Ariella R, Hennessy Erin, Tovar Alison, Finn Camille, Hammond Ross A, Economos Christina D
1 Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University , Boston, MA.
2 Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island , Kingston, RI.
Child Obes. 2018 Nov/Dec;14(8):537-552. doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0032. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
Childhood obesity prevention interventions have engaged coalitions in study design, implementation, and/or evaluation to improve research outcomes; yet, no systematic reviews have been conducted on this topic. This mixed methods review aims to characterize the processes and dynamics of coalition engagement in community-based childhood obesity prevention interventions.
Data Sources: Studies extracted from Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science; complementary original survey and interview data among researchers of included studies. Eligible Studies: Multisetting community-based obesity prevention interventions in high-income countries targeting children 0-12 years with anthropometric, behavioral, or environmental/policy outcomes. The Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Conceptual Model was used as an overarching framework.
Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Elements of CBPR were evident across all studies with community engagement in problem identification (n = 7), design/planning (n = 11), implementation (n = 12), evaluation (n = 4), dissemination (n = 2), and sustainability (n = 10) phases. Five studies reported favorable intervention effects on anthropometric (n = 4), behavioral (n = 1), and/or policy (n = 1) outcomes; descriptive associations suggested that these studies tended to engage community members in a greater number of research phases. Researchers involved in 7 of 13 included studies completed a survey and interview. Respondents recalled the importance of group facilitation, leadership, and shared understanding to multisector coalition work. Perceived coalition impacts included community capacity building and intervention sustainability.
This review contributes to a deeper understanding of intervention processes and dynamics within communities engaged in childhood obesity prevention. Future research should more rigorously assess and report on coalition involvement to assess the influence of coalitions on multiple outcomes, including child weight status.
儿童肥胖预防干预措施已让联盟参与到研究设计、实施和/或评估中,以改善研究结果;然而,尚未针对该主题进行系统评价。本混合方法评价旨在描述联盟参与基于社区的儿童肥胖预防干预措施的过程和动态。
数据来源:从Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed和科学网提取的研究;纳入研究的研究人员的补充原始调查和访谈数据。符合条件的研究:高收入国家针对0至12岁儿童的多场所基于社区的肥胖预防干预措施,具有人体测量、行为或环境/政策结果。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)概念模型被用作总体框架。
13项研究符合纳入标准。CBPR的要素在所有研究中都很明显,社区参与问题识别(n = 7)、设计/规划(n = 11)、实施(n = 12)、评估(n = 4)、传播(n = 2)和可持续性(n = 10)阶段。五项研究报告了对人体测量(n = 4)、行为(n = 1)和/或政策(n = 1)结果的有利干预效果;描述性关联表明,这些研究倾向于让社区成员参与更多的研究阶段。13项纳入研究中的7项研究的研究人员完成了一项调查和访谈。受访者回忆了团队促进、领导力和共同理解对多部门联盟工作的重要性。联盟的感知影响包括社区能力建设和干预可持续性。
本评价有助于更深入地理解参与儿童肥胖预防的社区内的干预过程和动态。未来的研究应更严格地评估和报告联盟的参与情况,以评估联盟对多种结果的影响,包括儿童体重状况。