Suppr超能文献

清醒状态与镇静状态下腕管松解术的成本分析。

A Cost Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed Wide Awake versus under Sedation.

机构信息

From the Rothman Institute at the Thomas Jefferson University.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1532-1538. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004983.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand surgery under local anesthesia only has been used more frequently in recent years. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative time and cost for carpal tunnel release performed under local anesthesia ("wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet," or WALANT) only to carpal tunnel release performed under intravenous sedation.

METHODS

A retrospective comparison of intraoperative (operating room) surgical time and postoperative (postanesthesia care unit) time for consecutive carpal tunnel release procedures performed under both intravenous sedation and wide-awake local anesthesia was undertaken. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using the same mini-open surgical technique. A cost analysis was performed by means of standardized anesthesia billing based on base units, time, and conversion rates.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total operative time, 28 minutes in the intravenous sedation group versus 26 minutes in the wide-awake local anesthesia group. Postanesthesia care unit times were significantly longer in the intravenous sedation group (84 minutes) compared to the wide-awake local anesthesia group (7 minutes). Depending on conversion rates used, a total of $139 to $432 was saved in each case performed with wide-awake local anesthesia by not using anesthesia services. In addition, a range of $1320 to $1613 was saved for the full episode of care, including anesthesia costs, operating room time, and postanesthesia care unit time for each patient undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia carpal tunnel release.

CONCLUSION

Carpal tunnel release surgery performed with the wide-awake local anesthesia technique offers significant reduction in cost for use of anesthesia and postanesthesia care unit resources.

摘要

背景

近年来,局部麻醉下的手部手术越来越多地被应用。本研究旨在比较单纯局部麻醉(“清醒局部麻醉无止血带”,WALANT)下和静脉镇静下腕管松解术的围手术期时间和费用。

方法

对连续进行的静脉镇静和清醒局部麻醉下腕管松解术的术中(手术室)手术时间和术后(麻醉后护理单元)时间进行回顾性比较。所有手术均由同一位外科医生采用相同的微创技术进行。通过基于基本单位、时间和转换率的标准化麻醉计费进行成本分析。

结果

在总手术时间方面,静脉镇静组为 28 分钟,清醒局部麻醉组为 26 分钟,两组之间无显著差异。静脉镇静组的麻醉后护理单元时间(84 分钟)明显长于清醒局部麻醉组(7 分钟)。根据使用的转换率,在每个使用清醒局部麻醉的病例中,总共可节省 139 至 432 美元,无需使用麻醉服务。此外,对于每个接受清醒局部麻醉腕管松解术的患者,从整个治疗过程来看,包括麻醉费用、手术室时间和麻醉后护理单元时间,可节省 1320 至 1613 美元。

结论

清醒局部麻醉技术下进行的腕管松解术可显著降低麻醉和麻醉后护理单元资源的使用成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验