Kammien Alexander J, Hu Kevin, Collar John, Rancu Albert L, Zhao K Lynn, Grauer Jonathan N, Colen David L
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2024 Apr 23:15589447241247247. doi: 10.1177/15589447241247247.
Prior studies have compared perioperative opioid prescriptions between carpal tunnel release (CTR) performed wide-awake and with traditional anesthetic techniques, but the association of opioid prescriptions with surgical setting has not been fully explored. The current study assessed the association of opioid prescriptions with surgical setting (office or operating room) for wide-awake CTR.
Patients with open CTR were identified in an administrative claims database (PearlDiver). Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, preoperative data less than 6 months, postoperative data less than 1 month, bilateral surgery, concomitant hand surgery, and traditional anesthesia (general anesthesia, sedation, or regional block). Patients were stratified by surgical setting (office or operating room) and matched by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and geographic region. Prior opioid prescriptions, opioid dependence/abuse, substance use disorder, back/neck pain, generalized anxiety, and major depression were identified. Opioid prescriptions within 7 days before and 30 days after surgery were characterized.
Each matched cohort included 5713 patients. Compared with patients with surgery in the operating room, fewer patients with office-based surgery filled opioid prescriptions (45% vs 62%), and those prescriptions had lower morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs, median 130 vs 188). These findings were statistically significant on univariate and multivariate analysis.
Following office-based CTR, fewer patients filled opioid prescriptions, and filled prescriptions had lower MME. This likely reflects patient and provider attitudes about pain control and opioid utilization. Further patient- and provider-level investigation may provide additional insights that could aid in efforts to reduce perioperative opioid utilization across surgical settings.
先前的研究比较了在清醒状态下进行腕管松解术(CTR)与传统麻醉技术下的围手术期阿片类药物处方情况,但阿片类药物处方与手术环境之间的关联尚未得到充分探讨。本研究评估了清醒状态下CTR的阿片类药物处方与手术环境(门诊或手术室)之间的关联。
在一个行政索赔数据库(PearlDiver)中识别接受开放性CTR的患者。排除标准包括年龄小于18岁、术前数据少于6个月、术后数据少于1个月、双侧手术、同期手部手术以及传统麻醉(全身麻醉、镇静或区域阻滞)。患者按手术环境(门诊或手术室)分层,并按年龄、性别、埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数和地理区域进行匹配。确定先前的阿片类药物处方、阿片类药物依赖/滥用、物质使用障碍、背部/颈部疼痛、广泛性焦虑和重度抑郁症情况。对手术前7天和手术后30天内的阿片类药物处方进行特征分析。
每个匹配队列包括5713名患者。与在手术室进行手术的患者相比,门诊手术患者中开具阿片类药物处方的患者较少(45%对62%),且这些处方的吗啡毫克当量较低(中位数130对188)。这些发现在单因素和多因素分析中具有统计学意义。
门诊CTR术后,开具阿片类药物处方的患者较少,且开具的处方吗啡毫克当量较低。这可能反映了患者和医护人员对疼痛控制和阿片类药物使用的态度。进一步在患者和医护人员层面进行调查可能会提供更多见解,有助于在所有手术环境中努力减少围手术期阿片类药物的使用。