Harvard University.
National Institute of Mental Health.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jan;31(1):49-63. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01335. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
Primate ventral and dorsal visual pathways both contain visual object representations. Dorsal regions receive more input from magnocellular system while ventral regions receive inputs from both magnocellular and parvocellular systems. Due to potential differences in the spatial sensitivites of manocellular and parvocellular systems, object representations in ventral and dorsal regions may differ in how they represent visual input from different spatial scales. To test this prediction, we asked observers to view blocks of images from six object categories, shown in full spectrum, high spatial frequency (SF), or low SF. We found robust object category decoding in all SF conditions as well as SF decoding in nearly all the early visual, ventral, and dorsal regions examined. Cross-SF decoding further revealed that object category representations in all regions exhibited substantial tolerance across the SF components. No difference between ventral and dorsal regions was found in their preference for the different SF components. Further comparisons revealed that, whereas differences in the SF component separated object category representations in early visual areas, such a separation was much smaller in downstream ventral and dorsal regions. In those regions, variations among the object categories played a more significant role in shaping the visual representational structures. Our findings show that ventral and dorsal regions are similar in how they represent visual input from different spatial scales and argue against a dissociation of these regions based on differential sensitivity to different SFs.
灵长类动物的腹侧和背侧视觉通路都包含视觉物体表示。背侧区域接收更多来自大细胞系统的输入,而腹侧区域则接收来自大细胞和小细胞系统的输入。由于大细胞和小细胞系统的空间灵敏度可能存在差异,腹侧和背侧区域中的物体表示可能在如何表示来自不同空间尺度的视觉输入方面存在差异。为了检验这一预测,我们要求观察者观看来自六个物体类别的图像块,这些图像块以全光谱、高空间频率 (SF) 或低 SF 显示。我们在所有 SF 条件下都发现了强大的物体类别解码,并且在几乎所有早期视觉、腹侧和背侧区域都发现了 SF 解码。交叉 SF 解码进一步表明,所有区域的物体类别表示在 SF 成分上都具有相当大的容忍度。在它们对不同 SF 成分的偏好方面,腹侧和背侧区域之间没有差异。进一步的比较表明,虽然 SF 成分的差异分离了早期视觉区域中的物体类别表示,但在下游的腹侧和背侧区域中,这种分离要小得多。在这些区域中,物体类别之间的差异在塑造视觉表示结构方面发挥了更重要的作用。我们的发现表明,腹侧和背侧区域在表示来自不同空间尺度的视觉输入方面相似,并且不支持基于对不同 SF 的敏感性差异来分离这些区域。