a Colorado School of Public Health Center for Health , Work & Environment , Aurora , Colorado.
b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Science , Colorado State University , Fort Collins , Colorado.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 Sep;15(9):686-699. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1492136.
Active lifestyles are beneficial to health and well-being but our workplaces may not be inherently supportive of physical activity at work. With the increasing use of technology in the workplace, many jobs are becoming more sedentary. The purpose of this study was to characterize levels of occupational physical activity (OPA) among active and sedentary workers. Two types of activity trackers (Fitbit Charge HR and Hexoskin) were used to assess activity measures (steps, heart rate, and energy expenditure) among workers during one full work shift. The first objective of the study was to assess the agreement between two types of accelerometer-based activity trackers as measures of occupational physical activity. The second objective of this study was to assess differences in measures of OPA among workers in generally physically active (brewery) and sedentary (office) work environments. Occupational physical activity data were collected from 50 workers in beer-brewing tasks and 51 workers in office work tasks. The 101 subjects were from the brewing service sector, a call center, and an engineering office within a manufacturing facility. A two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the two activity tracking devices while two-sample t-tests were used to compare the two worker groups. There were statistically significant differences in total steps and mean heart rate between the two devices. When comparing the two groups of workers there were statistically significant differences in measures of steps, mean heart rate, and energy expenditure. The results of the present study provide quantitative evidence that levels of OPA should be identified for different work groups.
积极的生活方式有益于健康和幸福,但我们的工作场所可能本身并不支持工作中的身体活动。随着技术在工作场所的广泛应用,许多工作变得越来越久坐不动。本研究的目的是描述活跃和久坐工人的职业体力活动(OPA)水平。两种类型的活动追踪器(Fitbit Charge HR 和 Hexoskin)用于评估工人在一个完整的工作班次中的活动测量指标(步数、心率和能量消耗)。本研究的第一个目标是评估两种基于加速度计的活动追踪器作为职业体力活动测量指标的一致性。本研究的第二个目标是评估在一般体力活动(啤酒厂)和久坐(办公室)工作环境中的工人的 OPA 测量指标差异。职业体力活动数据是从啤酒酿造任务中的 50 名工人和办公室工作任务中的 51 名工人中收集的。这 101 名受试者来自酿造服务部门、呼叫中心和制造设施内的工程办公室。使用双因素重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来评估两种活动跟踪设备,同时使用两样本 t 检验来比较两组工人。两种设备之间在总步数和平均心率方面存在统计学上的显著差异。当比较两组工人时,在步数、平均心率和能量消耗方面存在统计学上的显著差异。本研究的结果提供了定量证据,表明应针对不同的工作群体确定 OPA 水平。