• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院服务提供中的质量和资源效率:德国卒中护理质量的地理加性随机前沿分析。

Quality and resource efficiency in hospital service provision: A geoadditive stochastic frontier analysis of stroke quality of care in Germany.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Management, Berlin University of Technology, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.

Institute for Entrepreneurship and Business Development, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203017. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0203017
PMID:30188906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6126832/
Abstract

We specify a Bayesian, geoadditive Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) model to assess hospital performance along the dimensions of resources and quality of stroke care in German hospitals. With 1,100 annual observations and data from 2006 to 2013 and risk-adjusted patient volume as output, we introduce a production function that captures quality, resource inputs, hospital inefficiency determinants and spatial patterns of inefficiencies. With high relevance for hospital management and health system regulators, we identify performance improvement mechanisms by considering marginal effects for the average hospital. Specialization and certification can substantially reduce mortality. Regional and hospital-level concentration can improve quality and resource efficiency. Finally, our results demonstrate a trade-off between quality improvement and resource reduction and substantial regional variation in efficiency.

摘要

我们指定了一个贝叶斯、地理附加随机前沿分析(SFA)模型,以评估德国医院在资源和中风护理质量方面的绩效。我们使用了 2006 年至 2013 年的 1100 个年度观测值和数据,以及风险调整后的患者量作为产出,引入了一个生产函数,该函数捕获了质量、资源投入、医院效率决定因素和效率的空间模式。对于医院管理和卫生系统监管者来说,我们通过考虑平均医院的边际效应来确定绩效改进机制。专业化和认证可以显著降低死亡率。区域和医院层面的集中可以提高质量和资源效率。最后,我们的结果表明,在质量改进和资源减少之间存在权衡,并且效率在区域上存在很大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/9bee2da4d546/pone.0203017.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/a09715cba1d4/pone.0203017.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/9bc3b4d5e7b2/pone.0203017.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/e4f1f1bfd17c/pone.0203017.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/9bee2da4d546/pone.0203017.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/a09715cba1d4/pone.0203017.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/9bc3b4d5e7b2/pone.0203017.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/e4f1f1bfd17c/pone.0203017.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6c/6126832/9bee2da4d546/pone.0203017.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality and resource efficiency in hospital service provision: A geoadditive stochastic frontier analysis of stroke quality of care in Germany.医院服务提供中的质量和资源效率:德国卒中护理质量的地理加性随机前沿分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203017. eCollection 2018.
2
Provision of health care services and regional diversity in Germany: insights from a Bayesian health frontier analysis with spatial dependencies.德国医疗保健服务的提供与地区差异:基于具有空间相关性的贝叶斯健康前沿分析的见解。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Feb;21(1):55-71. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01111-9. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
3
Stroke units, certification, and outcomes in German hospitals: a longitudinal study of patient-based 30-day mortality for 2006-2014.德国医院的卒中单元、认证与治疗结果:一项基于患者的2006 - 2014年30天死亡率的纵向研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3664-y.
4
The relationship between hospital specialization and hospital efficiency: do different measures of specialization lead to different results?医院专业化与医院效率之间的关系:不同的专业化衡量标准是否会导致不同的结果?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2014 Dec;17(4):365-78. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9275-1. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
5
Regional Variation in 30-Day Ischemic Stroke Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries Treated in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals.参与“遵循卒中指南”项目的医院中接受治疗的医疗保险受益人的30天缺血性卒中结局的地区差异
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003604.
6
Improving health care service provision by adapting to regional diversity: An efficiency analysis for the case of Germany.通过适应区域多样性来改善医疗服务提供:以德国为例的效率分析。
Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Performance of Belgian hospitals: a frontier approach.比利时医院的绩效:一种前沿方法。
Health Econ. 1995 Sep-Oct;4(5):389-97. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730040505.
8
Measuring hospital inefficiency: the effects of controlling for quality and patient burden of illness.衡量医院效率低下:控制质量和患者疾病负担的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):1992-2013. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00892.x. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
9
Cost inefficiency under financial strain: a stochastic frontier analysis of hospitals in Washington State through the Great Recession.财政压力下的成本效率低下:大衰退期间华盛顿州医院的随机前沿分析。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Jun;20(2):232-245. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9349-8. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Performance of US teaching hospitals: a panel analysis of cost inefficiency.美国教学医院的绩效:成本无效率的面板分析
Health Care Manag Sci. 2004 Feb;7(1):7-16. doi: 10.1023/b:hcms.0000005393.24012.1c.

引用本文的文献

1
Is there any difference in organizational commitment between general hospitals and specialized hospitals? Empirical evidence from public hospitals in Beijing, China.综合性医院和专科医院的组织承诺有区别吗?来自中国北京市公立医院的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):1397. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10362-5.
2
Global and regional quality of care index (QCI) by gender and age in oesophageal cancer: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2019.全球和地区食管癌按性别和年龄划分的护理质量指数(QCI):1990-2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292348. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital quality variation matters - A time-trend and cross-section analysis of outcomes in German hospitals from 2006 to 2014.医院质量差异至关重要——对2006年至2014年德国医院治疗结果的时间趋势和横断面分析。
Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):842-852. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
Efficiency and optimal size of hospitals: Results of a systematic search.医院的效率与最佳规模:系统检索结果
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0174533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174533. eCollection 2017.
3
Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data.
Measuring efficiency of public hospitals under the impact of Covid-19: the case of Türkiye.
衡量新冠疫情影响下公立医院的效率:以土耳其为例。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00480-6.
4
Non-human and human service efficiency of long-term care facilities in China.中国长期护理机构的非人类和人类服务效率。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;11:1066190. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1066190. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparing Hospital Efficiency: An Illustrative Study of Knee and Hip Replacement Surgeries in Spain.比较医院效率:西班牙膝关节和髋关节置换手术的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3389. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043389.
6
The Core of Healthcare Efficiency: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review on Frontier Analysis of Hospitals.医疗保健效率的核心:关于医院前沿分析的综合文献计量学综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;10(7):1316. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071316.
7
Can competition improve hospital quality of care? A difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the effect of increasing quality transparency on hospital quality.竞争能否提高医院的护理质量?一种评估提高质量透明度对医院质量影响的双重差分方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Sep;23(7):1229-1242. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01423-9. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Rationale and design of individualized quality improvement based on the Computer Analysing system to improve Stroke management quality Evaluation (CASE): a multicenter historically controlled study.基于计算机分析系统的个体化质量改进以提高卒中管理质量评估(CASE)的原理与设计:一项多中心历史对照研究
Trials. 2020 Jul 24;21(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04598-3.
一般实践中的连续性护理与因门诊护理敏感情况而住院的关联:基于常规收集的个人层面数据的横断面研究。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 1;356:j84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j84.
4
Choice of hospital: Which type of quality matters?医院的选择:哪种质量至关重要?
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:230-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Lessons for major system change: centralization of stroke services in two metropolitan areas of England.重大系统变革的经验教训:英格兰两个大都市地区中风服务的集中化
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jul;21(3):156-65. doi: 10.1177/1355819615626189. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
6
Outcome, Use of Resources and Their Relationship in the Treatment of AMI, Stroke and Hip Fracture at European Hospitals.欧洲医院急性心肌梗死、中风和髋部骨折治疗的结局、资源利用及其关系
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24 Suppl 2:116-39. doi: 10.1002/hec.3270.
7
Individual and Regional-level Factors Contributing to Variation in Length of Stay After Cerebral Infarction in Six European Countries.六个欧洲国家脑梗死患者住院时间差异的个体和地区层面因素
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24 Suppl 2:38-52. doi: 10.1002/hec.3264.
8
Geographic Variation in Treatment and Outcomes Among Patients With AMI: Investigating Urban-Rural Differences Among Hospitalized Patients.急性心肌梗死患者治疗及预后的地理差异:探究住院患者的城乡差异
J Rural Health. 2017 Apr;33(2):158-166. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12165. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
9
An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke.一套国际标准的卒中后以患者为中心的结局指标
Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):180-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
10
Comparison of hospital variation in acute myocardial infarction care and outcome between Sweden and United Kingdom: population based cohort study using nationwide clinical registries.瑞典与英国急性心肌梗死护理及治疗结果的医院差异比较:基于全国临床登记处的人群队列研究。
BMJ. 2015 Aug 7;351:h3913. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3913.