Suppr超能文献

改善饮食障碍个体的改变动机:系统评价。

Improving motivation to change amongst individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review.

机构信息

Bournemouth University, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Change, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.

Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Sep;51(9):1033-1050. doi: 10.1002/eat.22945. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

People with eating disorders can have low motivation to change their eating disorder behaviors. Interventions aiming to enhance motivation to change have been increasingly advocated in their treatment. Questions remain regarding the strength of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of interventions that specifically focus on improving motivation. This review explored the evidence for improving motivation to change in eating disorders via clinical interventions.

METHOD

Searches of the published and unpublished literature were conducted by searching databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Web of Science) and trial registries (WHO ICTRP), and by contacting authors. Studies were included if they investigated an intervention for eating disorder patients, included a pre-post outcome measure of motivation to change and were published in English. Risk of bias was also assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were included in the final review. Evidence was found to support the use of interventions to improve motivation to change, though it was unclear whether motivational interventions present a more effective option than approaches that do not exclusively or specifically focus on motivation. However, motivational interventions were identified as being more effective than low intensity treatments. Risk of bias in included studies was generally high.

DISCUSSION

Motivation was found to increase across treatments in general, whether or not the focus of the intervention was on enhancing motivation. It is unclear if interventions specifically targeting motivation to change provide additional benefit over and above established treatment approaches.

摘要

目的

饮食障碍患者可能改变其饮食障碍行为的动力较低。在治疗中,越来越提倡针对增强改变动机的干预措施。对于专门旨在提高动机的干预措施的有效性的证据强度,仍存在疑问。本综述探讨了通过临床干预来改善饮食障碍患者改变动机的证据。

方法

通过搜索数据库(PubMed、PsychInfo、Web of Science)和试验登记处(WHO ICTRP)以及联系作者,对已发表和未发表的文献进行了搜索。如果研究调查了针对饮食障碍患者的干预措施,包括改变动机的预-后测结果衡量标准,并且以英文发表,则将其纳入研究。还评估了偏倚风险。

结果

最终综述纳入了 42 项研究。有证据支持使用干预措施来提高改变动机的动力,尽管尚不清楚动机干预是否比不专门或专门针对动机的方法更有效。然而,动机干预被确定比低强度治疗更有效。纳入研究的偏倚风险通常较高。

讨论

一般来说,无论干预的重点是否在于增强动机,动机都会在各种治疗中增加。目前尚不清楚专门针对改变动机的干预措施是否比既定的治疗方法提供额外的益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验