Suppr超能文献

治疗进食障碍前的动机与治疗结果:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Pretreatment motivation and therapy outcomes in eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Eating Disorders Continuum, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Dec;53(12):1879-1900. doi: 10.1002/eat.23376. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identifying modifiable predictors of outcomes following treatment for eating disorders may help to tailor interventions to patients' individual needs, improve treatment efficacy, and develop new interventions. The goal of this meta-analysis was to quantify the association between pretreatment motivation and posttreatment changes in eating disorder symptomology.

METHOD

We reviewed 196 longitudinal studies reporting on change on indices of overall eating-disorder symptomatology, weight gain, binge-eating, vomiting, anxiety/depression, and treatment adherence. Meta-analyses were performed using two complementary approaches: (a) combined probability analysis using the added Z's method; (b) effect size analyses. Using random-effect models, effect sizes were pooled when there were at least three studies with the same type of statistical design and reporting statistics on the same outcome. Heterogeneity in study outcome was evaluated using Q and I statistics. Studies were reviewed qualitatively when the number of studies or reported data were insufficient to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two articles were included. Although samples and treatments differed substantially across studies, results across studies were remarkably consistent. Both combined-probability and effect-size analyses indicated positive effects of pretreatment motivation on improvement in general eating-disorder symptoms (Cohen's r = .17), and an absence of effects on anxiety/depression symptoms. Remaining outcome indices were subject to selective reporting and/or small sample size bias.

DISCUSSION

Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating treatment engagement approaches in the treatment of eating disorders. Optimal reporting of study findings and improving study quality would improve future efforts to obtain an in-depth understanding of the relationship between motivation and eating disorder symptoms.

摘要

目的

确定治疗进食障碍后结局的可改变预测因素,可能有助于根据患者的个体需求调整干预措施,提高治疗效果,并开发新的干预措施。本研究的目的是量化治疗前动机与进食障碍症状学治疗后变化之间的相关性。

方法

我们回顾了 196 项纵向研究,这些研究报告了总体进食障碍症状、体重增加、暴食、呕吐、焦虑/抑郁和治疗依从性的变化指标。使用两种互补方法进行了荟萃分析:(a)使用加 Z 法的组合概率分析;(b)效应量分析。使用随机效应模型,当至少有 3 项具有相同统计设计且报告相同结果的统计数据的研究时,汇总效应大小。使用 Q 和 I 统计量评估研究结果的异质性。当研究数量或报告的数据不足以进行荟萃分析时,对研究进行定性审查。

结果

共纳入 42 篇文章。尽管样本和治疗方法在研究间存在显著差异,但研究结果非常一致。组合概率和效应量分析均表明治疗前动机对一般进食障碍症状改善的积极影响(Cohen's r =.17),对焦虑/抑郁症状无影响。其余结局指标受到选择性报告和/或小样本量偏倚的影响。

讨论

我们的研究结果强调了在治疗进食障碍时纳入治疗参与方法的重要性。最佳报告研究结果和提高研究质量将有助于未来深入了解动机与进食障碍症状之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验