Alghrani Amel
The School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7WW, UK.
J Law Biosci. 2018 Jul 10;5(2):301-328. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsy012. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Whilst internationally a growing body of literature is emerging on uterus transplantation as the latest advance in assisted reproductive technology, much of this has been devoted to responding to the ethical questions raised by this procedure in the context of its immediate purpose, to restore fertility in cisgender women. Very few have addressed whether it can be claimed that there is a right to gestate under the umbrella of procreative liberty, nor whether such a right, if it does exist, applies not only to cisgender women, but also transgender and gender variant individuals and cisgender men. In honour of Professor Robertson, I advance the debate further by examining the arguments put forward in his last paper and whether the right to gestate extends beyond cisgender women.
虽然在国际上，关于子宫移植作为辅助生殖技术最新进展的文献越来越多，但其中大部分都致力于回应这一程序在其直接目的（恢复顺性别女性的生育能力）背景下引发的伦理问题。很少有人探讨是否可以声称在生育自由的范畴内存在孕育的权利，也很少有人探讨这样一种权利（如果确实存在）是否不仅适用于顺性别女性，还适用于跨性别和性别认同不同的个体以及顺性别男性。为了纪念罗伯逊教授，我通过审视他上一篇论文中提出的论点以及孕育权是否超出顺性别女性的范畴，进一步推进这场辩论。
