Marshall Henry T, Djamgoz Mustafa B A
Neuroscience Solutions to Cancer Research Group, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Oncol. 2018 Aug 23;8:315. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00315. eCollection 2018.
Host immunity recognizes and eliminates most early tumor cells, yet immunological checkpoints, exemplified by CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, pose a significant obstacle to effective antitumor immune responses. T-lymphocyte co-inhibitory pathways influence intensity, inflammation and duration of antitumor immunity. However, tumors and their immunosuppressive microenvironments exploit them to evade immune destruction. Recent PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors yielded unprecedented efficacies and durable responses across advanced-stage melanoma, showcasing potential to replace conventional radiotherapy regimens. Neverthless, many clinical problems remain in terms of efficacy, patient-to-patient variability, and undesirable outcomes and side effects. In this review, we evaluate recent advances in the immuno-oncology field and discuss ways forward. First, we give an overview of current immunotherapy modalities, involving mainy single agents, including inhibitor monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting T-cell checkpoints of PD-1 and CTLA-4. However, neoantigen recognition alone cannot eliminate tumors effectively given their inherent complex micro-environment, heterogeneous nature and stemness. Then, based mainly upon CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors as a "backbone," we cover a range of emerging ("second-generation") therapies incorporating other immunotherapies or non-immune based strategies in synergistic combination. These include targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, co-stimulatory mAbs, bifunctional agents, epigenetic modulators (such as inhibitors of histone deacetylases or DNA methyltransferase), vaccines, adoptive-T-cell therapy, nanoparticles, oncolytic viruses, and even synthetic "gene circuits." A number of novel immunotherapy co-targets in pre-clinical development are also introduced. The latter include metabolic components, exosomes and ion channels. We discuss in some detail of the personalization of immunotherapy essential for ultimate maximization of clinical outcomes. Finally, we outline possible future technical and conceptual developments including realistic and models and inputs from physics, engineering, and artificial intelligence. We conclude that the breadth and quality of immunotherapeutic approaches and the types of cancers that can be treated will increase significantly in the foreseeable future.
宿主免疫系统能够识别并清除大多数早期肿瘤细胞,然而,以CTLA-4、PD-1和PD-L1为代表的免疫检查点,对有效的抗肿瘤免疫反应构成了重大障碍。T淋巴细胞共抑制通路影响抗肿瘤免疫的强度、炎症反应和持续时间。然而,肿瘤及其免疫抑制微环境利用这些通路来逃避免疫破坏。近期,PD-1检查点抑制剂在晚期黑色素瘤治疗中取得了前所未有的疗效和持久反应,显示出取代传统放疗方案的潜力。尽管如此,在疗效、患者个体差异以及不良结局和副作用方面,仍存在许多临床问题。在本综述中,我们评估了免疫肿瘤学领域的最新进展,并探讨了未来的发展方向。首先,我们概述了当前的免疫治疗模式,主要涉及单一药物,包括靶向PD-1和CTLA-4等T细胞检查点的抑制性单克隆抗体(mAb)。然而,鉴于肿瘤固有的复杂微环境、异质性和干性,仅新抗原识别并不能有效消除肿瘤。然后,主要基于CTLA-4和PD-1检查点抑制剂作为“主干”,我们涵盖了一系列新兴的(“第二代”)疗法,这些疗法将其他免疫疗法或非免疫策略进行协同组合。这些疗法包括酪氨酸激酶抑制剂等靶向疗法、共刺激mAb、双功能药物、表观遗传调节剂(如组蛋白去乙酰化酶或DNA甲基转移酶抑制剂)、疫苗、过继性T细胞疗法、纳米颗粒、溶瘤病毒,甚至合成“基因回路”。还介绍了一些处于临床前开发阶段的新型免疫治疗共同靶点。后者包括代谢成分、外泌体和离子通道。我们详细讨论了免疫治疗个性化对于最终实现临床疗效最大化的必要性。最后,我们概述了未来可能的技术和概念发展,包括现实模型以及物理学、工程学和人工智能的投入。我们得出结论,在可预见的未来,免疫治疗方法的广度和质量以及可治疗癌症的类型将显著增加。